Get the VERY LATEST (as of Friday afternoon) on the BetPanAm situation by reading Stephen Nover's interview with Bill on the RX home page www.theprescription.com
Charlie
Charlie
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> We’re not going out of business. There are more than enough funds available to cover the entire balances of the customers. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> what kind of BS is this if the money is there then pay the people what is rightfully theres
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by mvbski:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> We’re not going out of business. There are more than enough funds available to cover the entire balances of the customers. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> what kind of BS is this if the money is there then pay the people what is rightfully theres<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
MVB-
I agree sir. Quite frankly I am becoming speechlees over this outfits actions.
They are totally insulting the readers of the RX's intelligents with these statements that come out everyday.....am I right or wrong??
Tell me the difference in them saying over this past weekend that players would be paid on Tuesday and completed by Wednesday........to them NOW saying they will be paid on Monday after this weekend????
How in the hell would Bill know if everybody was going to be paid by MONDAY??? Answer me that one somebody??? THIS IS ALL A *ODDAMN bunch of BS!!
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> We’re not going out of business. There are more than enough funds available to cover the entire balances of the customers. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> what kind of BS is this if the money is there then pay the people what is rightfully theres<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
MVB-
I agree sir. Quite frankly I am becoming speechlees over this outfits actions.
They are totally insulting the readers of the RX's intelligents with these statements that come out everyday.....am I right or wrong??
Tell me the difference in them saying over this past weekend that players would be paid on Tuesday and completed by Wednesday........to them NOW saying they will be paid on Monday after this weekend????
How in the hell would Bill know if everybody was going to be paid by MONDAY??? Answer me that one somebody??? THIS IS ALL A *ODDAMN bunch of BS!!
Just my 2 cents. I really don't have a clue what to advise anyone who is trying to withdraw funds. I can't say have patience, but I can't say forget it you have no shot. The whole thing is a conundrum, (1: a question or problem having only a conjectural answer b : an intricate and difficult problem). In short I'm stumped for anything positve to add.
Sorry, wil.
Sorry, wil.
I don't know why, but I'm pretty optimistic about getting my money. Part of this is because I have less than my original deposit on my account and from our experiences with a similar shitty country like Costa Rica it seems the post up money is guaranteed by the shitty government even if the winnings are not.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by wilheim:
Just my 2 cents. I really don't have a clue what to advise anyone who is trying to withdraw funds. I can't say have patience, but I can't say forget it you have no shot. The whole thing is a conundrum, (1: a question or problem having only a conjectural answer b : an intricate and difficult problem). In short I'm stumped for anything positve to add.
Sorry, wil.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
WHAT ELSE IS NEW ?
Just my 2 cents. I really don't have a clue what to advise anyone who is trying to withdraw funds. I can't say have patience, but I can't say forget it you have no shot. The whole thing is a conundrum, (1: a question or problem having only a conjectural answer b : an intricate and difficult problem). In short I'm stumped for anything positve to add.
Sorry, wil.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
WHAT ELSE IS NEW ?
It hurts about as bad as all that you said about me. I dont give a **** what you have to say either. You are as biased as any of them, because I am sure this forum is your only form of income. By looking at your posting times, it is clear you dont actually work. You arent going to bite the hand that feeds you.
A few months ago, BTJ bet a past post game and the book held the play to see what would happen, when the play was a loser, the book decided to grade it as a loss. This moderator clearly took the position THAT A BET IS A BET IS A BET IS A BET.
Now when I make a play on a line that I knew was OFF, the book holds it and when it is a winner they decide it is NO ACTION. Here this moderator sides with the book and says I am totally 100% in the wrong.
If this moderator belives he is really a 100% unbiased player with no agendas, as he says he is kidding himself. He clearly has sided with the book when the 2 incidents are completly opposite he has taken the books side both times. A BET IS A BET IS A BET IS A BET --- UNLESS ITS A WINNER.
A few months ago, BTJ bet a past post game and the book held the play to see what would happen, when the play was a loser, the book decided to grade it as a loss. This moderator clearly took the position THAT A BET IS A BET IS A BET IS A BET.
Now when I make a play on a line that I knew was OFF, the book holds it and when it is a winner they decide it is NO ACTION. Here this moderator sides with the book and says I am totally 100% in the wrong.
If this moderator belives he is really a 100% unbiased player with no agendas, as he says he is kidding himself. He clearly has sided with the book when the 2 incidents are completly opposite he has taken the books side both times. A BET IS A BET IS A BET IS A BET --- UNLESS ITS A WINNER.
Keep telling yourself that. Someday you may figure out what integrity is, and realise that lying is a classless character flaw. You need to grow up, you know as well as I, what you did. Get over it, you took a shot and got away with it, don't expect any sympathy from honest posters on any forum. If you want to rehash the whole issue fine, I have all the information.
DANNY-
It was not the sole decision of Wilheim.
The General and myself also looked at all the facts presented and then, and only then did we make an UNBIASED decision.
Please sir, the book paid you in full even after your wrong doing. Feel very fortunate!!
90% of the places you do the same thing in Vegas or another offshore book, you would get NADA!!
It was not the sole decision of Wilheim.
The General and myself also looked at all the facts presented and then, and only then did we make an UNBIASED decision.
Please sir, the book paid you in full even after your wrong doing. Feel very fortunate!!
90% of the places you do the same thing in Vegas or another offshore book, you would get NADA!!
I got my money. I am happy. Just saying that if you really believe you are really a "player without any agendas" you are fooling yourself. You have sided with the book EVERY time when its a book that advertises here.
The BTJ issue was the exact opposite of this issue, and both times YOU SIDED WITH THE BOOK.
Clearly, the book intentionally posted a bad line, I intentionally bet a bad line. Then the Book held the bet until it was pretty clear I was going to win the bet and then and only then the book said bad line. You are so ready to convict the gamblers but you wont say a bad word about the book. It is my job as the gambler to get the very best line I can. I did that. Period. We ( the book and I ) both took shots at each other, but you will never say a bad word about one of the books. Hell, I wouldnt either if this site was my only forum of income. Go out and find a real job. 214 posts in the past 72 hours might look real cool at the rx get together but in the real world its pathetic.
The BTJ issue was the exact opposite of this issue, and both times YOU SIDED WITH THE BOOK.
Clearly, the book intentionally posted a bad line, I intentionally bet a bad line. Then the Book held the bet until it was pretty clear I was going to win the bet and then and only then the book said bad line. You are so ready to convict the gamblers but you wont say a bad word about the book. It is my job as the gambler to get the very best line I can. I did that. Period. We ( the book and I ) both took shots at each other, but you will never say a bad word about one of the books. Hell, I wouldnt either if this site was my only forum of income. Go out and find a real job. 214 posts in the past 72 hours might look real cool at the rx get together but in the real world its pathetic.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FISHHEAD:
DANNY-
It was not the sole decision of Wilheim.
The General and myself also looked at all the facts presented and then, and only then did we make an UNBIASED decision.
Please sir, the book paid you in full even after your wrong doing. Feel very fortunate!!
90% of the places you do the same thing in Vegas or another offshore book, you would get NADA!!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Fishhead,
I had already been paid $425 out of $500. I had already been paid 85%. Yes, you got me the last 15%. I appreciate it. Thank You.
But please stop telling yourself you are UNBIASED. You simply ARE NOT. You told the book - pay him the last $75 and we will go in the forum and bash him and make you ( the book) out to be the victim. This is not UNBIASED. Cleary, both the book and I were neither 100% innocent. However, he is so ready to call me a liar, theif, and scammer without 1 bad word against the book. That is NOT UNBIASED.
Again, the BTJ incident with Cascade was pretty much the exact opposite of this situation and the moderators jumped on the books side in an instant.
DANNY-
It was not the sole decision of Wilheim.
The General and myself also looked at all the facts presented and then, and only then did we make an UNBIASED decision.
Please sir, the book paid you in full even after your wrong doing. Feel very fortunate!!
90% of the places you do the same thing in Vegas or another offshore book, you would get NADA!!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Fishhead,
I had already been paid $425 out of $500. I had already been paid 85%. Yes, you got me the last 15%. I appreciate it. Thank You.
But please stop telling yourself you are UNBIASED. You simply ARE NOT. You told the book - pay him the last $75 and we will go in the forum and bash him and make you ( the book) out to be the victim. This is not UNBIASED. Cleary, both the book and I were neither 100% innocent. However, he is so ready to call me a liar, theif, and scammer without 1 bad word against the book. That is NOT UNBIASED.
Again, the BTJ incident with Cascade was pretty much the exact opposite of this situation and the moderators jumped on the books side in an instant.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by wilheim:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I intentionally bet a bad line <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
LOL.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Never said I didnt. I knew the line was out of whack with other books lines. I never said I didnt know that. My job as a gambler is to get the best line I can. By the way, good job ignoring THE BOOK INTENTIONALLY POSTED A BAD LINE.
Why am I not surprised that you ignored that part ?
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I intentionally bet a bad line <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
LOL.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Never said I didnt. I knew the line was out of whack with other books lines. I never said I didnt know that. My job as a gambler is to get the best line I can. By the way, good job ignoring THE BOOK INTENTIONALLY POSTED A BAD LINE.
Why am I not surprised that you ignored that part ?
