Don't need any. LOL
Sometimes all you have to do is let someone walk into there own self created trap.
Read post # 11, dipshit:
7-29-2014, 12:03 PM
Originally Posted by CHOPTALK
USA and China for total work hours.
They are not 1 and 2 when it comes to hours per citizen but they are #1 and #2 when it comes to total work hours.
For per capita GDP the US and China are nowhere near the top. look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...PP)_per_capita US is between 6th and 10th well behind such countries as Norway and Switzerland. China is between 93rd and 96th. Again, your arguments hold little or no water
7-29-2014, 12:03 PM
USA and China for total work hours.
They are not 1 and 2 when it comes to hours per citizen but they are #1 and #2 when it comes to total work hours.
For per capita GDP the US and China are nowhere near the top. look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...PP)_per_capita US is between 6th and 10th well behind such countries as Norway and Switzerland. China is between 93rd and 96th. Again, your arguments hold little or no water
Read post # 11, dipshit:
7-29-2014, 12:03 PMOriginally Posted by CHOPTALK
USA and China for total work hours.
They are not 1 and 2 when it comes to hours per citizen but they are #1 and #2 when it comes to total work hours.
For per capita GDP the US and China are nowhere near the top. look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...PP)_per_capita US is between 6th and 10th well behind such countries as Norway and Switzerland. China is between 93rd and 96th. Again, your arguments hold little or no water
Its a good thing I did not say per capita isn't?
Otherwise I would be wrong.
As a matter of fact I said NOT per capita.
LOL
Are you serious?
LOL
Even the post you quoted of me I said not per capita.
Why don't you read post #11 dips hit
Carry on man.
You are on a roll.
LOL it amazes me that I even have to explain.
But what I said in the bold was not per capita.
I said total work hours meaning total combined work hours not taking each persons average into account which is another way of saying per capita.
I will just assume you are trolling like you did yesterday in the BC thread and assume you are really not this dumb.
Thats debatable.
Regardless everything I have said is 100% true.
Regardless or not it means nothing or not means nothing.
Those other issues are subjects for another time but I give a lot of props to companies that treat their employees well. There is actually an interesting issue going on here about a local supermarket where the CEO was ousted and he was known for his generosity with employees. It is all over the news, he is trying to buy the company and hopefully they do let him back.
People are picketing outside the stores because of their admiration for him.
average income number one in the world
average net worth number four in the world
our poor and better off then most of the world's middle class
right, we need to be more like them. You know, we need to be more like all those people from all those countries dying to join us in our misery
average net worth number four in the world
our poor and better off then most of the world's middle class
right, we need to be more like them. You know, we need to be more like all those people from all those countries dying to join us in our misery
he following are facts about persons defined as "poor" by the Census Bureau, taken from various government reports:
While the poor are generally well nourished, some poor families do experience temporary food shortages. But even this condition is relatively rare; 89 percent of the poor report their families have "enough" food to eat, while only 2 percent say they "often" do not have enough to eat.
Overall, the typical American defined as poor by the government has a car, air conditioning, a refrigerator, a stove, a clothes washer and dryer, and a microwave. He has two color televisions, cable or satellite TV reception, a VCR or DVD player, and a stereo. He is able to obtain medical care. His home is in good repair and is not overcrowded. By his own report, his family is not hungry and he had sufficient funds in the past year to meet his family's essential needs. While this individual's life is not opulent, it is equally far from the popular images of dire poverty conveyed by the press, liberal activists, and politicians.
Of course, the living conditions of the average poor American should not be taken as representing all the poor
http://www.heritage.org/research/re...or-examining-the-plague-of-poverty-in-america
- Forty-three percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
- Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
- Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded. More than two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.
- The average poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.)
- Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
- Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.
- Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
- Eighty-nine percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.
While the poor are generally well nourished, some poor families do experience temporary food shortages. But even this condition is relatively rare; 89 percent of the poor report their families have "enough" food to eat, while only 2 percent say they "often" do not have enough to eat.
Overall, the typical American defined as poor by the government has a car, air conditioning, a refrigerator, a stove, a clothes washer and dryer, and a microwave. He has two color televisions, cable or satellite TV reception, a VCR or DVD player, and a stereo. He is able to obtain medical care. His home is in good repair and is not overcrowded. By his own report, his family is not hungry and he had sufficient funds in the past year to meet his family's essential needs. While this individual's life is not opulent, it is equally far from the popular images of dire poverty conveyed by the press, liberal activists, and politicians.
Of course, the living conditions of the average poor American should not be taken as representing all the poor
http://www.heritage.org/research/re...or-examining-the-plague-of-poverty-in-america
