The "REAL" Fade Brandon Lang Thread

[7Heismans]

beginning to wish i did.....fukkin line jumps from 6 to 9 to suck in temple bettors

If they were sucking Temple money in the line would DROP. If they want to suck Temple money in, how is raising it a FG helping to get people on that side? Christ, epic fail.

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

LANGATANG FOOTBALL 2010-2011

28-31-3, -23 DIMES


GAME 01: USC -12.5 @ HAWAII (1ST HALF) LOSER (-27.5 Dimes)
GAME 02: UCONN +3 @ MICHIGAN LOSER (-27.5 Dimes)
GAME 03: SMU +13 vs TEXAS TECH WINNER (+25 Dimes)
GAME 04: VA TECH -1 vs BOISE STATE LOSER (-16.5 Dimes)
GAME 05: MISS ST. +1 vs AUBURN LOSER (-27.5 Dimes)
GAME 06: UTEP/HOUSTON OVER 75 WINNER (+20 Dimes)
GAME 07: LSU -10 @ VANDY WINNER (+100 Dimes)
GAME 08: BROWNS +3 @ BUCCANEERS PUSH (+0 Dimes)
GAME 09: CHARGERS -4.5 @ CHIEFS LOSER (-27.5 Dimes)
GAME 10: NC STATE -2 vs CINCINNATI WINNER (+25 Dimes)
GAME 11: KANSAS/SO MISS OVER 51.5 LOSER (-27.5 Dimes)
GAME 12: OREGON STATE -11 vs LOUISVILLE (1ST HALF) LOSER (-55 Dimes)
GAME 13: PATRIOTS -2.5 (-130) @ JETS LOSER (-39 Dimes)
GAME 14: 49ERS +5 vs SAINTS WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 15: PITT +4 vs MIAMI (FL) LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 16: NEVADA ML (-175) @ BYU WINNER (+150 Dimes)
GAME 17: BENGALS -3 @ PANTHERS WINNER (+40 Dimes)
GAME 18: PACKERS -3 @ BEARS LOSER (-33 Dimes)
GAME 19: TEXAS A&M/OKLA ST. OVER 66 WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 20: UTAH ST. +3 vs BYU (1ST HALF) WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 21: OSU -3.5 vs ASU LOSER (-55 Dimes)
GAME 22: RAVENS +2.5 @ STEELERS WINNER (+40 Dimes)
GAME 23: DOLPHINS +1 vs PATRIOTS LOSER (-22 Dimes)
GAME 24: MID TENN -3.5 vs TROY LOSER (-16.5 Dimes)
GAME 25: UTAH ST. +1 @ LOUISIANA TECH LOSER (-55 Dimes)
GAME 26: FALCONS -3 @ BROWNS WINNER (+75 Dimes)
GAME 27: VIKES/JETS UNDER 19 (1ST HALF) WINNER (+20 Dimes)
GAME 28: UCF -6.5 @ MARSHALL WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 29: KSTATE/KANSAS UNDER 25 (1ST HALF) LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 30: CINCI/LVILLE UNDER 56 LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 31: OREGON ST. +2 @ WASHINGTON WINNER (+50 Dimes)
GAME 32: COLTS -3 @ REDSKINS PUSH (+0 Dimes)
GAME 33: JAGUARS +3 vs TITANS LOSER (-22 Dimes)
GAME 34: UCLA/OREGON OVER 60.5 WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 35: OKLA ML (-145) @ MIZZOU LOSER (-58 Dimes)
GAME 36: VIKINGS +3.5 (-145) @ PACKERS LOSER (-58 Dimes)
GAME 37: GIANTS +2.5 @ COWBOYS (1ST HALF) WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 38: BOISE ST. -22 vs LATECH (1ST HALF) LOSER (-22 Dimes)
GAME 39: NC STATE +4 vs FSU WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 40: WAKE +5.5 @ MARYLAND LOSER (-55 Dimes)
GAME 41: CHARGERS -3 vs TITANS (1ST HALF) LOSER (-82.5 Dimes)
GAME 42: COLTS -3.5 vs TEXANS (1ST HALF) WINNER (+20 Dimes)
GAME 43: ARK STATE +2 vs MID TENN WINNER (+30 Dimes)
GAME 44: HOUSTON U +2 vs UCF LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 45: TULSA -17 vs RICE WINNER (+50 Dimes)
GAME 46: JETS -3 @ LIONS (1ST HALF) PUSH (+0 Dimes)
GAME 47: BENGALS +5.5 vs STEELERS LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 48: TOLEDO +11 @ NIU LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 49: BOWLING GREEN +2.5 vs MIAMI OHIO LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 50: FALCONS -1 vs RAVENS WINNER (+25 Dimes)
GAME 51: BOISE STATE/IDAHO OVER 65 WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 52: SOMIS/CENFL OVER 55 LOSER (-33 Dimes)
GAME 53: RAMS +5.5 @ 49ERS WINNER (+40 Dimes)
GAME 54: EAGLES/REDSKINS OVER 43.5 WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 55: OHIO +10 @ TEMPLE WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 56: BGREN +10 @ TOLEDO LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 57: BEARS +2 @ DOLPHINS WINNER (+20 Dimes)
GAME 58: FRESNO ST/BOISE ST OVER 66 LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 59: USC -3 @ OREGON ST LOSER (-33 Dimes) (GOY)
GAME 60: COLTS +4 @ PATRIOTS WINNER (+40 Dimes)
GAME 61: BRONCOS/CHARGERS OVER 50 LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 62: MIAOH +8.5 vs TEMPLE WINNER (+10 Dimes)

==============================================================


FADER NATION FOOTBALL 2010-2011

32-27-3, -95 DIMES


GAME 01: HAWAII +12.5 vs USC (1ST HALF) WINNER (+25 Dimes)
GAME 02: MICHIGAN -3 vs UCONN WINNER (+25 Dimes)
GAME 03: TEXAS TECH -13 vs SMU LOSER (-27.5 Dimes)
GAME 04: BOISE STATE +1 @ VA TECH WINNER (+15 Dimes)
GAME 05: AUBURN -1 @ MISS ST. WINNER (+25 Dimes)
GAME 06: UTEP/HOU UNDER 75 LOSER (-22 Dimes)
GAME 07: VANDY +11 vs LSU LOSER (-110 Dimes)
GAME 08: BUCCANEERS -3 vs BROWNS PUSH (+0 Dimes)
GAME 09: CHIEFS +4.5 vs CHARGERS WINNER (+25 Dimes)
GAME 10: CINCINNATI +2 @ NC STATE LOSER (-27.5 Dimes)
GAME 11: KANSAS/SO MISS UNDER 53 WINNER (+25 Dimes)
GAME 12: LOUISVILLE +11 @ OREGON STATE (1ST HALF) WINNER (+50 Dimes)
GAME 13: JETS +3 vs PATRIOTS WINNER (+30 Dimes)
GAME 14: SAINTS -5 @ 49ERS LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 15: MIAMI (FL) -4 @ PITT WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 16: BYU ML (+170) vs NEVADA LOSER (-150 Dimes)
GAME 17: PANTHERS +3 vs BENGALS LOSER (-44 Dimes)
GAME 18: BEARS +3 vs PACKERS WINNER (+30 Dimes)
GAME 19: TEXAS A&M/OKLA ST. UNDER 66 LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 20: BYU -3 @ UTAH ST. (1ST HALF) LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 21: ASU +3.5 @ OSU WINNER (+50 Dimes)
GAME 22: STEELERS -2.5 vs RAVENS LOSER (-44 Dimes)
GAME 23: PATRIOTS -1 @ DOLPHINS WINNER (+20 Dimes)
GAME 24: TROY +3.5 @ MID TENN WINNER (+15 Dimes)
GAME 25: LOUISIANA TECH -1 vs UTAH ST. WINNER (+50 Dimes)
GAME 26: BROWNS +3 vs FALCONS LOSER (-82.5 Dimes)
GAME 27: VIKES/JETS OVER 19 (1ST HALF) LOSER (-22 Dimes)
GAME 28: MARSHALL +6.5 vs UCF LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 29: KSTATE/KANSAS OVER 25 (1ST HALF) WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 30: CINCI/LVILLE OVER 56 WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 31: WASHINGTON -1.5 vs OREGON ST. LOSER (-55 Dimes)
GAME 32: REDSKINS +3.5 vs COLTS WINNER (+40 Dimes)
GAME 33: TITANS -3 @ JAGUARS WINNER (+20 Dimes)
GAME 34: UCLA/OREGON UNDER 60.5 LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 35: MIZZOU ML (+140) vs OKLA WINNER (+56 Dimes)
GAME 36: PACKERS -3 (+100) vs VIKINGS WINNER (+40 Dimes)
GAME 37: COWBOYS -2.5 vs GIANTS (1ST HALF) LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 38: LATECH +22 @ BOISE ST. (1ST HALF) WINNER (+20 Dimes)
GAME 39: FSU -4 @ NC STATE LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 40: MARYLAND -5.5 vs WAKE WINNER (+50 Dimes)
GAME 41: TITANS +3 @ CHARGERS (1ST HALF) WINNER (+75 Dimes)
GAME 42: TEXANS +3.5 @ COLTS (1ST HALF) LOSER (-22 Dimes)
GAME 43: MID TENN -2 @ ARK STATE LOSER (-33 Dimes)
GAME 44: UCF -2 @ HOUSTON U WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 45: RICE +17 @ TULSA LOSER (-55 Dimes)
GAME 46: LIONS +3 vs JETS (1ST HALF) PUSH (+0 Dimes)
GAME 47: STEELERS -6 @ BENGALS PUSH (+0 Dimes)
GAME 48: NIU -11 vs TOLEDO WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 49: MIAMI OHIO -2.5 @ BOWLING GREEN WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 50: RAVENS +1 @ FALCONS LOSER (-27.5 Dimes)
GAME 51: BOISE STATE/IDAHO UNDER 67 WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 52: SOMIS/CENFL UNDER 55 WINNER (+30 Dimes)
GAME 53: 49ERS -5.5 vs RAMS LOSER (-44 Dimes)
GAME 54: EAGLES/REDSKINS UNDER 43.5 LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 55: TEMPLE -11 vs OHIO LOSER (-11 Dimes)
GAME 56: TOLEDO -10 vs BGREN WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 57: DOLPHINS -2 vs BEARS LOSER (-22 Dimes)
GAME 58: FRESNO ST/BOISE ST UNDER 66 WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 59: OREGON ST +3 vs USC WINNER (+30 Dimes)
GAME 60: PATRIOTS -4 vs COLTS LOSER (-44 Dimes)
GAME 61: BRONCOS/CHARGERS UNDER 50 WINNER (+10 Dimes)
GAME 62: TEMPLE -8.5 @ MIAOH LOSER (-11 Dimes)

===============================================================

The above College and NFL Football plays are Lang's paid plays from Eddie Roman's website....
Courtesy of RidgeRider.

 

[eroscillator]

If they were sucking Temple money in the line would DROP. If they want to suck Temple money in, how is raising it a FG helping to get people on that side? Christ, epic fail.

sort of like the stock market.....price goes up,,,errbody jumps on the bandwagon thinking oddsmakers know something we dont

 

[Incubus]

Damn This Pissing & Shitting Elephant is Becoming a Regular Here!

hno: ##)hno:##)hno:##)hno:##)hno:##)hno:

​

 

[DwayneBowe]

Some picks are so obvious...why fade those ones?? Like the Colts and Temple. They lost for you guys once already...everyone knows they're horrible.

 

[dandejesus22]

I'm new to posting but I've been following this thread for some time and I have to say that while I appreciate your efforts Pimpy in keeping a record of Lang's games, they are not truly accurate for the faders. I agree with all Langers numbers, but fader nation numbers are far worse than what you have posted.

If we are realistic with ourselves most of us probably pushed Arizona State +3. If Lang released it at 3.5, I agree we put a loser up for him but I'd bet most faders / gambling public, including myself pushed that game. Even if you look at this thread, at least half the people said they got it at +3.

2 days later some no name idiot posted Lang had New England over Miami. He had Miami, but all the faders here, again myself included, played Miami and lost so Lang's figures are correct for that day, ours are not. No fader, at least here anyway, won that game right? You can't say we won 20 dimes, we all lost 22, you included Pimpy. There's no mention of this in your numbers.

I personally did win with Pittsburgh -5.5 over Cincinnati for 10 dimes, you have it listed as a push on both ends.

I only wager on Football games, and the last two years I absolutely made money fading Lang but this year, dating back to preseason, and there were a few games Ridge didn't post, I am down 227 dimes fading Lang.

Pimpy, you didn't post preseason numbers and I don't like saying this because I don't want you guys jumping on me but Lang was profitable in the preseason.

I gotta play out the season but this probably isn't a viable option any more. He continues to do this 1 game a day thing, which probably won't change. Sad to see this cash cow is probably coming to an end. All good things do I guess.

Ridge, I appreciate you posting the games every day and for the guys out there who post when you aren't around, thanks.

 

[eroscillator]

Some picks are so obvious...why fade those ones?? Like the Colts and Temple. They lost for you guys once already...everyone knows they're horrible.

NOW you tell me!!!!!

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

I'm new to posting but I've been following this thread for some time and I have to say that while I appreciate your efforts Pimpy in keeping a record of Lang's games, they are not truly accurate for the faders. I agree with all Langers numbers, but fader nation numbers are far worse than what you have posted.

If we are realistic with ourselves most of us probably pushed Arizona State +3. If Lang released it at 3.5, I agree we put a loser up for him but I'd bet most faders / gambling public, including myself pushed that game. Even if you look at this thread, at least half the people said they got it at +3.

2 days later some no name idiot posted Lang had New England over Miami. He had Miami, but all the faders here, again myself included, played Miami and lost so Lang's figures are correct for that day, ours are not. No fader, at least here anyway, won that game right? You can't say we won 20 dimes, we all lost 22, you included Pimpy. There's no mention of this in your numbers.

I personally did win with Pittsburgh -5.5 over Cincinnati for 10 dimes, you have it listed as a push on both ends.

I only wager on Football games, and the last two years I absolutely made money fading Lang but this year, dating back to preseason, and there were a few games Ridge didn't post, I am down 227 dimes fading Lang.

Pimpy, you didn't post preseason numbers and I don't like saying this because I don't want you guys jumping on me but Lang was profitable in the preseason.

I gotta play out the season but this probably isn't a viable option any more. He continues to do this 1 game a day thing, which probably won't change. Sad to see this cash cow is probably coming to an end. All good things do I guess.

Ridge, I appreciate you posting the games every day and for the guys out there who post when you aren't around, thanks.

How many fucking times do I have to repeat myself to every newb that shows up that the FADE LANG record is just to show what a person's record would be if they faded Lang Dime For Dime on every fucking play he makes. It's not anyone's personal record! The Miami game was wrong but that doesn't mean shit because I'm not keeping personal records!

Since Lang has gone to a single play a day I personally haven't faded all of them, only ones I agree with, and I don't base my fades, when I do Fade, on his fucked up dime amounts. The old ways of fading Lang are over, unless he goes back to his old style of multiple plays a day. Adapt or you will lose!...and then make a whiny post about how many fictional dimes you are down.

As for Lang's pre-season football record, I don't bet pre-season football so I didn't keep any of his records because I don't/didn't give two shits.

If you follow Lang play for play, dime for dime, you are in the red.

If you fade Lang, play for play, dime for dime, you are in the red...but I think the smart people figured out a while ago that this no longer works and have adapted to just using Lang as a tool to fade the plays they agree with.

 

[RidgeRider]

Langer's Thanksgiving 11/25 Play

New Orleans - Dallas OVER 50 points for 10 dimes.

He's passing on Wednesday going to Thailand to meet his tranny wife's parents.

 

[DwayneBowe]

I'm playing the over so...idk if that's bad luck he is playing this but I'm on it.

 

[Incubus]

WARNING! Do NOT Use PRIME DIRECTIVE or FADE LANG MONEY MANAGEMENT SYTEM Anymore!

Since Lang has gone to a single play a day I personally haven't faded all of them, only ones I agree with, and I don't base my fades, when I do Fade, on his fucked up dime amounts. The old ways of fading Lang are over, unless he goes back to his old style of multiple plays a day. Adapt or you will lose!...and then make a whiny post about how many fictional dimes you are down.

If you fade Lang, play for play, dime for dime, you are in the red...but I think the smart people figured out a while ago that this no longer works and have adapted to just using Lang as a tool to fade the plays they agree with.

I agree 100% with Pimpy on this.

The PRIME DIRECTIVE, which I thoroughly enjoyed posting, is DEAD!

............................................................................................................

Prime Directive (n.) The most important rule or law, which must be obeyed above all others

Prime Directive = FADE BRANDON LANG (AKA THE LANGATANG)

In order to succeed long term at this endeavor, you must be cold, calculated and RUTHLESS like a GOD DAMN TERMINATOR! ~~:<<

............................................................................................................

The FADE LANG MONEY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM is DEAD!

............................................................................................................

FADE LANG MONEY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Key to winning by FADING Lang-Link-Langatang is STRICT MONEY MANAGEMENT.

1. Only play against his "dime" plays in similar incriments.
2. Do NOT do FLAT (or SAME AMOUNT) bets.
3. Do not "double up" on the next game if you lose a game.
4. Do not "cherry pick" his plays. Play ALL released plays with dime value.

Just follow his dime incriments IN REVERSE.

Example: Assign a value of $5 per "dime." You can assign any dollar amount your bankroll feels comfortable with.

Lang has a "40 dimer" on Team A. Bet $200 (40 "dimes" x $5) on Team B.

Say he also has two 15 "dimers" on the menu for that day. Go against his Team A, you will bet $75 (15 "dimes" x $5) on Team B. Repeat for 2nd 15 "dimer."

EXAMPLE: Say he loses his 40 dimer but wins his two 15 dimers.

You go 1-2 ATS FADING. If you did FLAT betting, you would be MINUS $.

However, since you followed his dime system IN REVERSE, you will actually be + money.

PREMISE: Lang loses his BIGGER valued dime plays - 25 dimes or larger.

Does this make sense to you?

RULE: PASS ON HIS "FREE" PLAYS, SINCE NO VALUE IS ASSIGNED TO THEM!

RULE: PASS ON HIS TEASERS, BECAUSE EVEN IF HE LOSES, YOU STILL MAY NOT WIN
​

............................................................................................................

It's in everyone's best interest to bury both the PRIME DIRECTIVE and FADE BRANDON LANG MONEY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM permanently into the proverbial graveyard! If you don't, be prepared to lose BIG!

It's a fact these edicts received their "last rites" at the start of this football season.

If you persist in following the PRIME DIRECTIVE and the FADE LANG MONEY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, you will get fleeced BADLY!

This thread is no longer to be used in that fashion.


Use the Lang plays posted here in this thread as a guidepost and not a hitching post.

'NUFF SAID! :grandmais

​

 

[Incubus]

I'm playing the over so...idk if that's bad luck he is playing this but I'm on it.

Up to you. One can not fade Lang blindly anymore. Those days are long gone. Read what I just posted. GL2U!:grandmais

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

Use the Lang plays posted here in this thread as a guidepost and not a hitching post.

'NUFF SAID! :grandmais

Well put, Devil Man, well put. :toast:

 

[chevycola]

Since the PURE FADE seems to be dying out, what are some of the systems any of you are using to fade lang these days? I'd be curious to see.

 

[dandejesus22]

I hate to say this because I'm new and you guys are going to kill me for it but I'm starting to believe Lang was actually telling the truth about his past relationship with Budin / DeMarco. This clown really did a complete 360 when it comes to picking games. Never mind this 1 game a day concept, but out of his 62 football releases this year, 27 have been underdogs, only 23 favorites. That's simply unheard of for Lang. He's used more first half bets than I ever can remember and he didn't use any series bets in the MLB / NBA Playoffs. Remember those, he used to play them at will.

His daily video's were ridiculous and he doesn't even do those anymore.

It's like he completely changed. No one does that, especially in a 6 month stretch no less. I'm new to posting but I'm smart enough to realize a handicapper has a certain style when it comes to picking games. Lang did a complete turnaround on his style. Can someone explain how that happens please?

Maybe we should fade Demarco instead. Someone else mentioned Benton.

I think Lang is an a**hole but the way he changed certainly has at least made me think something else was indeed going on at his old site. Those guys haven't changed a bit. They still pick games like they always have. Lang seemingly, if this keeps up, did a 360. Why?

I guess I just want to win again, how can we do that?????

 

[RidgeRider]

Langer may have been forced to make some plays when he dodn't want to or play more games than he normally would but he still has a losing record. Hes 27-32-3 so far in football. How is that so good? I'll keep fading because the guy is clueless. He's played all of 2 basketball games this season and we're a month into the season. He gives out 95% football games during football season because people will buy a football game over a basketball game 90% of the time. It's all about sales for Langer and when you only have one game to choose from you lose more than you win when your an uneducated bettor like Langer.

 

[reservoirdog]

I hate to say this because I'm new and you guys are going to kill me for it but I'm starting to believe Lang was actually telling the truth about his past relationship with Budin / DeMarco. This clown really did a complete 360 when it comes to picking games. Never mind this 1 game a day concept, but out of his 62 football releases this year, 27 have been underdogs, only 23 favorites. That's simply unheard of for Lang. He's used more first half bets than I ever can remember and he didn't use any series bets in the MLB / NBA Playoffs. Remember those, he used to play them at will.

His daily video's were ridiculous and he doesn't even do those anymore.

It's like he completely changed. No one does that, especially in a 6 month stretch no less. I'm new to posting but I'm smart enough to realize a handicapper has a certain style when it comes to picking games. Lang did a complete turnaround on his style. Can someone explain how that happens please?

Maybe we should fade Demarco instead. Someone else mentioned Benton.

I think Lang is an a**hole but the way he changed certainly has at least made me think something else was indeed going on at his old site. Those guys haven't changed a bit. They still pick games like they always have. Lang seemingly, if this keeps up, did a 360. Why?

I guess I just want to win again, how can we do that?????

Is that you Brandon?? :think2:

 

[dandejesus22]

OH man, you guys are going to do it to me now. I knew it. Can't even say one semi nice thing about the guy without being accused of being him or working for him. I think Lang is a fraud personally, I dislike him greatly, and I hope he gets everything he has coming to him in life. I just simply made a point about his handicapping nowadays as opposed to the good 'ole days. That's all. Has he not been different???

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

I just simply made a point about his handicapping nowadays as opposed to the good 'ole days. That's all. Has he not been different???

Lang sucked before and he still sucks. The difference is he is only throwing out 1 game a day, sometimes skipping days, where before he was throwing out usually 3 to 5 games a day.

Lang is not a handicapper, he's a used car salesman.

On a side note, I'd be curious for a mod to run an IP check on you to find out whose ghost you are. There is absolutely no way you are a 1st time poster on this site. After I read your first post my bullshit alarm went off and it is seldom wrong.

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

Maybe we should fade Demarco instead. Someone else mentioned Benton.

How many of these fucking posts do we get in here on a weekly basis? ##)

Yet nobody starts a fade DeMarco or Benton thread!

Go Fade DeBaldo and Benton! Start a thread, you lazy fuck!