This is gonna be funny...perhaps out of all his plays he releases the ONLY loss on the list the week for NFL
So Sunday he goes 200 dimes on Carolina not is best bet Detroit and.....
Detroit wins in a blowout....could have been the 200 dime winner
New England "buy up to 3" Also, could have released for a 200 dime winner
Ravens -4 Also, could have released as his 200 dime winner
But no, no, no....something about Carolina -5 called his attention because they were playing about the worst team possible and it was laying less than 1 TD.
Philly +1....TBD 150 dimer pending he doesn't bail on his own play and flip it as everything else hit and damn he's bound to miss one.
The obvious answer to this is that like many scamdicappers, he tosses out a number of picks to fall back on and then to
emphasize and claim the pick that won is the only one that should be considered!!
The problem with Lang is that he doesn't cover up his tracks in his modus operandi and is quite easy to expose.
Other scamdicappers like Phil Steele/NC are a bit more adept and skillful in covering up and spinning their losses by lying many
times by omission rather than commission.
The most glaring example of this is their horrible 1-10 record this season with their historically good Early Play record
but on Monday when they give out the new EB Play, they don't allude to this at all, but simply state the longer-term positive record!!
The moral of the story if this is the right terminology, is that if a scammer chooses to try to dupe the betting public about his record,
at least do so with a bit more planning and care!!
Needless to say, in this regard, Lang fails miserably as much as the picks themselves!!