The "REAL" Fade Brandon Lang Thread

[savage1]

Don't worry, we documented him as Mike Anthony.

I am not disagreeing here but I distinctly remember a person back in the I am going to say in the 80's or possibly 90'swho

was featured on one of those Saturday morning tv tout shows who was much better looking and with an entirely

different voice than the Lang/Mike Anthony pictured here.

The Mike Anthony I remember was also part of a group that had a comp. the line featuring him and other cappers, and again

imo the voice was a lot different from the one of Lang.

I did call the number on a daily basis to get the free comps.

Also I distinctly remember that when Mike Anthony I remember disappeared for reasons unknown, I recall calling

another comp. line number which many times was answered by a capper who identified himself as Jack Stroud, but who has

the EXACT same voice and intonations as Mike Anthony!!

My conclusion is that what is posted above was/is just the latest reincarnation of Mike Antony.

If I am correct in my opinion about he original Mike Anthony beginning in the 80's, then it just corroborates what I said

because and correct me if I am wrong, Lang was not around in the 80's.

The Sean Michaels/Lang double identity was/is much more obvious in any case.

 

[savage1]

I am not disagreeing here but I distinctly remember a person back in the I am going to say in the 80's or possibly 90'swho

was featured on one of those Saturday morning tv tout shows who was much better looking and with an entirely

different voice than the Lang/Mike Anthony pictured here.

The Mike Anthony I remember was also part of a group that had a comp. the line featuring him and other cappers, and again

imo the voice was a lot different from the one of Lang.

I did call the number on a daily basis to get the free comps.

Also I distinctly remember that when Mike Anthony I remember disappeared for reasons unknown, I recall calling

another comp. line number which many times was answered by a capper who identified himself as Jack Stroud, but who has

the EXACT same voice and intonations as Mike Anthony!!

My conclusion is that what is posted above was/is just the latest reincarnation of Mike Antony.

If I am correct in my opinion about he original Mike Anthony beginning in the 80's, then it just corroborates what I said

because and correct me if I am wrong, Lang was not around in the 80's.

The Sean Michaels/Lang double identity was/is much more obvious in any case.

Here is another Mike Anthony that I found, who imo doesn't look the Mike Anthony I remember.

However, to be fair, this guy says he goes back 27 years which would take us back to 1996, which would mean that the guy

I remember was on tv in the 90's rather than late 80's.

Also, to be fair, after all of these years, people do change in appearance meaning that it could be the same Mike Antony I remember,

and certainly a lot more than the obvious Lang Mike Anthony you posted.

Also upon further review, it looks like the emergence of the Mike Anthony I remember maybe earlier than 1996

because unless I missed something there is no date on the article other than to make reference to 2018 which would

mean that if the article was written in 2018, then that would push back this Mke Anthony's start of his career to 1991

which is more in line with what I said earlier.

Sorry for the dissertation-just trying to help!!

oops-I almost forgot the most important part.

Mike Anthony | Sports Advice | 10StarPicks

 

[steve021]

The Pick: My 75 Dime winner is the Dodgers -1 1/2 runs.



The Line: The current line is +140 in Vegas and offshore as of 9:20 am EST. Please specify Burnes and Lynn at the time of wager. Be sure to shop around for the best line available.



Your Analysis



Back by 4:00 pm EST with today's breakdown.



My Two Cents - Brandon Lang

Iit's back to baseball for #10 out of 12.

Well as much money as I made going against Reid Detmers in his last start, he got me last night as the Rangers just couldn't hit him in the 2-0 loss.

So after banging home 9 straight baseball winners, I have dropped 2 in a row.

9-2 MLB RUN

$10 MLB Bettor Has Made $6,925

Again, no reason to hit the panic button.

Now I have to get right back in the winners circle with this 4th straight 75 dime baseball winner off Tuesday's 75 dime winner Rangers run line 12-0 over Angels.

Listen folks, football season is right around the corner. No better time to heat up than right now with football approaching.

Bottom line: I told you a winning streak was coming. The ebbs and flow of B.Lang.

Nobody gets hot like I do and handing the world 9 of 11 baseball winners is the mere definition of hot.

Today is about banging home this 4th straight 75 dime baseball winner and pushing the baseball run to 10-2 my last 12.

LFG!

 

[XENO]

Omg thats funny

 

[RidgeRider]

To show you how much of a loser bettor Lang is I can't remember him ever taking the +1.5 runs in a game. What a complete fish!

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

Blowout of the Month, for the 15th time this month.
I don't think Lang understands the "of the month" part, lol.
Maybe if clown boy loses this one we will get some pre-season football picks?
If not it's gonna be MLB heavy favorites on the run line from here to eternity.

 

[delv77]

Too by many high favs on the rl . Scares u away from taking other team which is usually horrible .

 

[finman13]

Blowout of the Month, for the 15th time this month.
I don't think Lang understands the "of the month" part, lol.
Maybe if clown boy loses this one we will get some pre-season football picks?
If not it's gonna be MLB heavy favorites on the run line from here to eternity.

Lmfao!!

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

Lang declares that he plans to keep on winning.
Proceeds to lose 3 Run Line plays in a row for negative 255 Dimes.

 

[sniperpicks]

??⚾️

LAD backup C hit first HR of year for 1-0 win ?

another small fade win. Sort of. Took ML and over 48. NExt Saturday navy and ????

see if it wins

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

LANG 2023 BANKROLL
NEGATIVE 1,852.75 DIMES

LANG $10 BETTOR DOWN $18,527.5 (PLUS $1,995 Yearly Fee For Picks = -$20,522.5)

PAID PICKS: 103-116-2 / 47.0%

-Lang by Month-
DEC 2022: 11-19-1, -1,462 DIMES
JAN: 18-12, +252.5 DIMES
FEB: 13-16, -492.5 DIMES
MAR: 13-17-1, -547 DIMES
APR: 11-18-1, -599 DIMES
MAY: 16-14, -163.5 DIMES
JUN: 14-16, -92.5 DIMES
JUL: 9-17, -656 DIMES
AUG: 10-6, +445.25 DIMES

-Lang by Week-
WEEK 00: 12/27 to 1/2, (1W-5L) -671.5 DIMES (1W-0L +75 Dimes from 1/1 to 1/2)
WEEK 01: 1/3 to 1/9, (5W-2L) +25 DIMES
WEEK 02: 1/10 to 1/16, (5W-2L) +292.5 DIMES
WEEK 03: 1/17 to 1/23, (3W-4L) -163 DIMES
WEEK 04: 1/24 to 1/30, (3W-4L) -17 DIMES
WEEK 05: 1/31 to 2/6, (3W-4L) -198 DIMES
WEEK 06: 2/7 to 2/13, (4W-4L) -224 DIMES
WEEK 07: 2/14 to 2/20, (3W-4L) -113.5 DIMES
WEEK 08: 2/21 to 2/27, (3W-4L) +53 DIMES
WEEK 09: 2/28 to 3/6, (3W-3L-1P) -185 DIMES
WEEK 10: 3/7 to 3/13, (5W-2L) +156 DIMES
WEEK 11: 3/14 to 3/20, (2W-5L) -293.5 DIMES
WEEK 12: 3/21 to 3/27, (4W-3L) +64 DIMES
WEEK 13: 3/28 to 4/3, (1W-6L) -311.5 DIMES
WEEK 14: 4/4 to 4/10, (2W-4L-1P) -59 DIMES
WEEK 15: 4/11 to 4/17, (3W-4L) -198.5 DIMES
WEEK 16: 4/18 to 4/24, (3W-4L) -71.5 DIMES
WEEK 17: 4/25 to 5/1, (3W-4L) -177 DIMES
WEEK 18: 5/2 to 5/8, (5W-2L) +237.5 DIMES
WEEK 19: 5/9 to 5/15, (5W-2L) +358 DIMES
WEEK 20: 5/16 to 5/22, (3W-4L) -200 DIMES
WEEK 21: 5/23 to 5/29, (2W-4L) -499 DIMES
WEEK 22: 5/30 to 6/5, (3W-4L) +118 DIMES
WEEK 23: 6/6 to 6/12, (4W-3L) -20 DIMES
WEEK 24: 6/13 to 6/19, (3W-4L) +74 DIMES
WEEK 25: 6/20 to 6/26, (2W-5L) -297 DIMES
WEEK 26: 6/27 to 7/3, (4W-3L) +40 DIMES
WEEK 27: 7/4 to 7/10, (1W-5L) -286 DIMES
WEEK 28: 7/11 to 7/17, (2W-2L) -30 DIMES
WEEK 29: 7/18 to 7/24, (2W-4L) -97 DIMES
WEEK 30: 7/25 to 7/31, (2W-5L) -345.5 DIMES
WEEK 31: 8/1 to 8/7, (4W-2L) +172.75 DIMES
WEEK 32: 8/8 to 8/14, (6W-1L) +527.5 DIMES
WEEK 33: 8/15 to 8/21, (0W-3L) -255 DIMES

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

LOSER LANG TRACKER (IN-SEASON SPORTS)

MLB REGULAR SEASON (2023)

38-44, -296.25 Dimes

DIME RATINGS

150 DIME: 5-2
100 DIME: 7-7
80 DIME: 4-8
75 DIME: 7-7
60 DIME: 4-7
50 DIME: 5-4
40 DIME: 6-9

NFL PRE-SEASON (2023-'24)

0-2, -172.5 Dimes

DIME RATINGS

75 DIME: 0-1
60 DIME: 0-1

 

[PimpyMcPimp]

LOSER LANG 10+ YEAR RECORD TRACKER
1/01/2013 up to NOW!!!

NEGATIVE 10,725.75 DIMES

LANG $10 BETTOR DOWN $107,257.5 (PLUS $1,995 Yearly Fee For Picks x11 = -$129,202.5)

-Lang Past 10+ Years-
2023: NEGATIVE 1,852.75 DIMES (01/01/23 to 08/17/23)
2022: NEGATIVE 1,586.5 DIMES
2021: NEGATIVE 1,524.5 DIMES
2020: POSITIVE* 402.5 DIMES (*NOT A FULL YEAR DUE TO COVID)
2019: NEGATIVE 761.75 DIMES
2018: NEGATIVE 738 DIMES
2017: NEGATIVE 499.5 DIMES
2016: NEGATIVE 2,941.5 DIMES
2015: NEGATIVE 181 DIMES
2014: NEGATIVE 113.75 DIMES
2013: NEGATIVE 929 DIMES

9/01/2007 to 4/16/2010: NEGATIVE** 3,245.7 DIMES (**AS DOCUMENTED BY AL DEMARCO) (NOT INCLUDED IN ABOVE RECORD)

 

[steve021]

The Pick: My 50 Dime winner is the Carolina Panthers



The Line: The current line is +3 in Vegas and offshore as of 6:20 am EST. Be sure to shop around for the best line available.



Note: If the line you get on the Panthers is anywhere from +2 1/2 to +4 points, I advise buying the half-point up on the Panthers.



Your Analysis

I am back by 4pm est.



My Two Cents - Brandon Lang

Time to go on another 3-0 weekend sweep.

50 DIME
-BANKROLL BUILDER -
#2 IN A ROW

Panthers - Giants - 7:00 pm EST

#1 Friday - 8/4
Orioles RL (+125) 10-3 over Mets

Well after hitting 9 straight baseball winners I dropped 3 in a row after my 75 dimer on the Dodgers -1 1/2 runs goes down as they only win 1-0.

Bottom line: Yes I gave back a little profit the last 3 days but the run is still incredible and the bankroll is in an outstanding place.

9-3 MLB RUN

$10 MLB Bettor Has Made $6,175

Again, no reason to hit the panic button.

Now I have to get right back in the winners circle with another Friday, Saturday and Sunday run.

I did it last weekend when I absolutely had to and I am confident I will do it again this weekend starting with this Friday preseason winner on Panthers/Giants.

Listen folks, football season is right around the corner. Seriously, college football starts a week from tomorrow.

THAT'S 8 DAYS FOLKS.

I need to rip off another 8 day run just like I did and this 2nd straight 50 dimer will jump start just that.

LFG!

 

[finman13]

If lang advises buying up at the current line of 3 the. He better grade it with that extra juice if it loses. You can't advise "clients" to buy and you don't pube head.

 

[Buckeyefan80]

If lang advises buying up at the current line of 3 the. He better grade it with that extra juice if it loses. You can't advise "clients" to buy and you don't pube head.

He doesn’t bet the plays he gives out so you know he’ll cheat. If someone was able to get the plays every day and just track him by the line and juice he says it is at the time I’d bet he would be further in the hole than what Pimpy has documented here. Anyone that knows gambling knows it’s -EV to buy .5 in the first place, but this douchebag advises people to buy it at 3, 3.5, and 4. ?‍

Love that football is back and he can’t stay away. He’ll be down thousands of “dimes” in no time! GL faders.

 

[phelps123]

Buckeyefan80, those numbers are not even key numbers. I would understand buying from 2.5 to 3 but not at 3, 3.5 and 4!

 

[savage1]

I can only speak for myself but when I see a reasonable line of -154 as was the case of the Dodgers. that was the

home team(meaning that theyget only eight times at bat if they are ahead going into the ninth), I would NEVER bet

just the run line as Lang did out of obvious greed and stupidity, but rather I would either bet the moneyline only or

at the very least bet half on the moneyline and the other half to protect myself against one-run wins.

If the line is prohibitive such as -190, 200, etc., well then imo it makes a bit more sense to bet the run line only.

 

[StackinGreen]

He doesn’t bet the plays he gives out so you know he’ll cheat. If someone was able to get the plays every day and just track him by the line and juice he says it is at the time I’d bet he would be further in the hole than what Pimpy has documented here. Anyone that knows gambling knows it’s -EV to buy .5 in the first place, but this douchebag advises people to buy it at 3, 3.5, and 4. ?‍

Love that football is back and he can’t stay away. He’ll be down thousands of “dimes” in no time! GL faders.

Yup. He thinks he knows football the best which is the funniest, since he does the worst on it and it's not really even close.

 

[Buckeyefan80]

Buckeyefan80, those numbers are not even key numbers. I would understand buying from 2.5 to 3 but not at 3, 3.5 and 4!

That was exactly my point phelps. If it’s not 2.5 there’s 0 value, 3 could be debatable. Same goes for 6.5 and 7, but any other number is extremely -EV.

I stopped buying halves years ago when I tracked it and discovered it wasn’t worth it bc I lost more from the high juice when the hook didn’t save me.