Well, he's been on a "losing roll" since existence!!@)![]()
I fucked up and said he was 1-2 for the week down 38 dimes when he is really 2-1, down 38 dimes. So I guess he is on a roll...he's BUTTAH!


I still can't get over the fact that the Tuesday rainout game where Lang had the Orioles and Redd had the Yankees, there was no mention of a loss for Lang after they played Wednesday but Redd said his play was a winner. Lang records the game as a no play and Redd takes a win. If the Orioles would've won then Lang would claim victory and Redd would claim no play. Just another example of how they lie and cheat when given a window to do so. The correct call of course after a rainout should be a no play. If they wanted to play that game again on Wednesday, with the same pitchers, then they would need to list the play again on Wednesday...neither did. They both came with new sets of plays.
hno: