Well connected donor. Who cares. You're an imbecile. Next hoax please.
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]To enhance his status and make money. [/FONT]
I have no idea why Rudy does what he does and more importantly I don't care.Ok, so he's a well connected donor seeking legal representation. Why is Giuliani setting him up with Trump's personal lawyer?? Why would Rudy let him get so close if he was just some high-level donor scumbag looking for access??
https://judiciary.house.gov/uploade...rnas_imessage_excerpt_giuliani_2019-09-30.pdf
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]This hole impeachment thingy has beem a joke since day one. I'd like to see the SenateMaybe Bloodhound Bob should defend him?
Lol...Anutta Swing anda Miss for the TDS clown car
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]This hole impeachment thingy has beem a joke since day one. I'd like to see the Senate
just vote, no witnesses, no remarks from either side, no nothing. Don't give the Dems
one iota of credibility. Just exonerate Trump and move on.
Alinsky... Rule # 7.
"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest
in any issue for only a limited time...."
[/FONT]
agree...lets get this farce overThis hole impeachment thingy has beem a joke since day one. I'd like to see the Senate
just vote, no witnesses, no remarks from either side, no nothing. Don't give the Dems
one iota of credibility. Just exonerate Trump and move on.
Alinsky... Rule # 7.
"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest
in any issue for only a limited time...."
The House has the responsibility to impeach, the Senate to remove or acquit.It would be the first impeachment trial in history without witnesses. If Bolton was on the call, or in the room, or whatever when Trump spoke with Zelensky,... why not get the facts straight from him? He could straighten this whole thing out right?
The House has the responsibility to impeach, the Senate to remove or acquit.
If the House doesn't make its case it's not the Senates job to make it for them.
If Bolten or Parnas or Giuliani for that matter were important witnesses they
should have called them in. The fact that they didn't tells me they weren't or
they did a piss poor job of making their case.
Either way it's a moot point now.