The Iz NHL Tuesday's Picks (123-84 YTD)

[The Iz]

Boston -170 (montreal owns boston, but I will still go with the bruins)
NY Rangers -175
Philly -175
Washington -230
Carolina -125
Nashville Even
Minnesota -150
Calgary -260
Vancouver -150
San Jose -360 (undefeated @ home)

Maybe I will add the Avs & Jackets later. No lines as of 7:40 am EST.

Good luck to the takers.

 

[The Iz]

Avs already started. It's okay though. Good luck, guys!

Could be wrong, but I feel gr8 about my picks tonights.

 

[The Iz]

:money8:Adding a parlay.....feel lucky.

Parlay:

Carolina -115
Minnesota -160
Calgary -275
San Jose -375

 

[The Iz]

Wow! Not looking as good as I thought. :think2:

 

[The Iz]

NY Rangers -175 (winner)
Philly -175 (loss)
Washington -230 (loss) What the hell is wrong with the Caps tonight

 

[The Iz]

Boston -170 (winner)

 

[deadlift_405]

I jumped on the Nashville train tonight :toast:

 

[The Iz]

Yeah, I thought that was an tough play but I had to take Nashville.

 

[The Iz]

Carolina -125 (loss) Wow! 1st the Caps loss at home; Now the
Senators win a game......
Nashville Even (winner)
Minnesota -150 (winner)
Parly (loss)

 

[SkateSharpener]

NY Rangers -175 (winner)
Philly -175 (loss)
Washington -230 (loss) What the hell is wrong with the Caps tonight

This is what I was talking to you about the other day. In a sport where all plays arent graded @ -110 odds one can be 100-50 record on the season and down money with that kind of juice. Postin your record or winning percentage without the units won/lost makes it irrelevant. Its not rocket science bud!

 

[The Iz]

This is what I was talking to you about the other day. In a sport where all plays arent graded @ -110 odds one can be 100-50 record on the season and down money with that kind of juice. Postin your record or winning percentage without the units won/lost makes it irrelevant. Its not rocket science bud!

Thanks for that awesome expert advice. I take notes and toss them in the trash as usual. My units are up. My money is flowing. You make your bets and worry about your cash flow. You can't have 60% wins and be down on your money unless you have poor money management. Again my picks are just thrown out there to help others make a decision. I'm just having fun and cashing in, bro. Tonight I might just being making back what I put in.

 

[SkateSharpener]

Thanks for that awesome expert advice. I take notes and toss them in the trash as usual. My units are up. My money is flowing. You make your bets and worry about your cash flow. You can't have 60% wins and be down on your money unless you have poor money management. Again my picks are just thrown out there to help others make a decision. I'm just having fun and cashing in, bro. Tonight I might just being making back what I put in.

Wow I guess it may be rocket science to you then hno: In NHL where you are laying odds well above -110 (such as in several of your plays) you can easily and I repeat EASILY hit 60% and be down units. This is comical. I am 100-67 (60%) on the season with the 67 losers being between -150 to -200 odds. Do the math genious = DOWN MONEY.

 

[BToth]

You can't have 60% wins and be down on your money unless you have poor money management.

Oh, yes you can. You will be losing money at a 60% win rate and if you laying more than -150. Do the math. Tonight, your average lay for the ten bets was approx. -190. So you have to have a win rate of greater than 66% if your average lay was -190 every night. So under your scenario, you clearer would be a loser. Now, tonight, I have you at 6-4 (assuming SJ does not give up 6 goals in 5 minutes), which is your "magic number 60%", but you are down 0.8 units--and I am not even including that silly parlay you recommended and lost.

By the way, another mistake in your thread: San Jose is not undefeated at home this season. They lost 4-3 to Nashville on November 11th. I should know as I had Nashville at +204 (Matchbook) that night, and--really--that would be the only side (from a ML perspective) or nothing I would take if that same game was played 100 times.

 

[The Iz]

genious? lol

 

[The Iz]

By the way, another mistake in your thread: San Jose is not undefeated at home this season. They lost 4-3 to Nashville on November 11th. I should know as I had Nashville at +204 (Matchbook) that night, and--really--that would be the only side (from a ML perspective) or nothing I would take if that same game was played 100 times.

"the Sharks opened a four-game homestand by improving to an incredible 20-0-2 at the Shark Tank this season, going up 5-1 with three goals in the second period."

"San Jose still hasn't lost a regular-season game at home in regulation since last Feb. 14, a span of 31 games." from ESPN

True they have lost to Nashvillle and Edmonton in OT at home.

I'm still posting, guys. Whether you're impressed or harrass me, I really could give a shit less. I'm here to have fun and have the funds to lose if I please. I don't always take the favorite btw.

 

[SkateSharpener]

"the Sharks opened a four-game homestand by improving to an incredible 20-0-2 at the Shark Tank this season, going up 5-1 with three goals in the second period."

"San Jose still hasn't lost a regular-season game at home in regulation since last Feb. 14, a span of 31 games." from ESPN

True they have lost to Nashvillle and Edmonton in OT at home.

I'm still posting, guys. Whether you're impressed or harrass me, I really could give a shit less. I'm here to have fun and have the funds to lose if I please. I don't always take the favorite btw.

I have no problem with you posting thats not the issue at all. I just stated that its irrelevant to have your YTD record indicated WITHOUT the win/loss unit amount of all the losers. Thats all otherwise it makes no sense to includ this record..hno:

 

[deadlift_405]

Sounds like someone had himself a big glass of hateraid:nono5:

 

[The Iz]

Yeah Deadlift. If he or anyone else doesn't want to read or is bothered by my posting my record, it seems like they would go look at the thousands of other postings. Needless to say:

Calgary -260 (winner)
Vancouver -150 (loss)
San Jose -360 (winner)

6-5 on the night.

 

[SkateSharpener]

Yeah Deadlift. If he or anyone else doesn't want to read or is bothered by my posting my record, it seems like they would go look at the thousands of other postings. Needless to say:

Calgary -260 (winner)
Vancouver -150 (loss)
San Jose -360 (winner)

6-5 on the night.

6-5 night for -$180

Why do you fail to mention how much is lost and won????? Like I said before get that record out of your signature or make the units won/loss accurate. Guys I am 129-89 for 59% but I am so stupid that I dont tell you how many units I have won or lost with my average odds on each of my plays being between -150 to -200. Unreal I feel like I am communicating with a 10 year old here. hno: