The Drug War Toll MOunts (And Nobody Wants to Talk About It)

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
<!--StartFragment --> by Radley Balko
The Cato Institute

I<!--StartFragment -->
n Washington, D.C., a 27-year old quadriplegic is sentenced to ten days in jail for marijuana possession, where he dies under suspicious circumstances. In Florida, a wheelchair-bound multiple sclerosis patient now serves a 25-year prison sentence for using an out-of-state doctor to obtain pain medication. And in Palestine, Texas, prosecutors arrest 72 people -- all of them black -- and charge them with distributing crack cocaine. The scene bears a remarkable resemblance to a similar mass, mostly-black drug bust in nearby Tulia five years ago.

These examples aren't exceptional. They're typical. America's drug war marches on, impervious to efficacy, justice, or absurdity. Drug prohibition was nowhere to be found in Election 2004. There was no mention of it in the debates, the conventions, or the endless cable news campaign coverage.

In some ways, that was a blessing. Campaign discussion of drug prohibition has too often focused on which candidate took what drugs when, and who was more sorry for having done so.

While it's refreshing that we've moved beyond apologies, it's also true that under the laws many of today's politicians support, a kid who experiments with illicit drugs the same way many of them once did may not get the chance to finish school or go to college, much less run for political office.

The number of policymakers who've dared to question any aspect of the drug war could comfortably fit on the back of a pocket-sized edition of the Bill of Rights. This needs to change. America should reexamine its drug policy.

Today, federal and state governments spend between $40 and $60 billion per year to fight the war on drugs, about ten times the amount spent in 1980 -- and billions more to keep drug felons in jail. The U.S. now has more than 318,000 people behind bars for drug-related offenses, more than the total prison populations of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain combined.

Our prison population has increased by 400 percent since 1980, while the general population has increased just 20 percent. America also now has the highest incarceration rate in the world -- 732 of every 100,000 citizens are behind bars.

<!--StartFragment -->
The drug war has wrought the zero tolerance mindset, asset forfeiture laws, mandatory minimum sentences, and countless exceptions to criminal defense and civil liberties protections. Some sociologists blame it for much of the plight of America's inner cities. Others point out that it has corrupted law enforcement, just as alcohol prohibition did in the 1920s.

On peripheral issues like medicinal marijuana and prescription painkillers, the drug war has treated chronically and terminally ill patients as junkies, and the doctors who treat them as common pushers. Drug war accoutrements, such as "no-knock" raids and searches, border patrols, black market turf wars and crossfire, and international interdiction efforts, have claimed untold numbers of innocent lives.

For all that sacrifice, are we at least winning?

Even by the government's own standards for success, the answer is unquestionably "no." The illicit drug trade is estimated to be worth $50 billion today ($400 billion worldwide), up from $1 billion 25 years ago. Annual surveys of high school seniors show heroin and marijuana are as available today than they were in 1975. Deaths from drug overdoses have doubled in the last 20 years.

According to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the price of for a gram of heroin has dropped by about 38 percent since 1981, while the purity of that gram has increased six-fold. The price of cocaine has dropped by 50 percent, while its purity has increased by 70 percent. Just recently, the ONDCP waged a public relations campaign against increasingly pure forms of marijuana coming in from Canada.

So despite all of the money we've spent and people we've imprisoned, despite the damage done to our cities and the integrity of our criminal justice system, despite the restrictions we've allowed on our civil liberties, despite the innocent lives lost and the needless suffering we've imposed on sick people and their doctors -- despite all of this -- the drug trade isn't just thriving, it's growing. Illicit drugs are cheaper, more abundant, and of purer concentration than ever before.

Like alcohol prohibition before it, drug prohibition has failed, by every conceivable measure. Isn't it about time for America to take a hard look at its drug policy?
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
Presuming those figures aren't exaggerated: holy crap.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
The bigger shocker than the numbers is the time leadership has been given to see that it doesn't work, and there appears to be no change in sight of thier miserably failed attempts....

Entire criminal organizations thrive and make millions and billions of dollars by the simple fact that the trade is illegal, creating the black market which dictates the avalanche of money rolling in....How many drug dealers want to see thier trade legalized?

Never worked with alcohol, won't work with drugs, prostitution or gambling.
Fill the courts
Fill the morgues with victims of the drug war
Fill the prisons
Fill the law enforcement budgets
Fill the pockets of organized crime and gangs
Fill the reason to commit other crimes to support a spendy habit
Fill the unemployment lines with people considered unemployable
Empty the treasury and dump billions into an enterprise that could be a controlled, regulated, and a much safer cash crop generating billions of dollars for the economy, an economy that desperately needs it.

Too many narrow thinkers with thier mind set in moral concrete for this to ever happen. They don't see it except for the case of alcohol.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,724
Tokens
Good but also depressing read, thanks for reminding us how stupid our society and government is on some things.
 

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS
Joined
Dec 21, 1999
Messages
3,061
Tokens
How do y'all propose to accomplish that? We'll end up paying much more your way-- forget government, politics, & society norms:
the proof lies in that so many corporations have voluntarily enacted costly drug testing programs... why? Because they need to -- there's really no alternative.

Legalizing drugs only halfway works in a Socialist system--30 hour workweeks, 2 months paid vacation, 2 weeks off at Easter & Xmas, 2 hour siesta lunch break at work every day, leave work/close shop early if the weather is foul & also if the weather is great-- for the beach!....& forget about inventing new technologies or being the world leader in anything. Then we can resort to enviously snip in the UN at whatever countries progress to world leadership.

I agree about prostitution & gambling, but not about drugs-- not if we want to settle for mediocrity....

And if you think what we pay now is high, it won't compare to the enormous future health costs from accidents, etc.-- & since production will be lower, and hence the tax revenues.... we'll become just like those Indian reservations that have no gambling revenues.....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,724
Tokens
No way Charles...

We could treat addicts and imporve drug awareness education programs for a fraction of what's being spent now plus marijuana could be used to create revenue through taxation.
How could it cause more health care costs than cigs and alchohol that are both legal and mainstream.
Besides the fact that the real crime as far as the whole issue goes is jailing users.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,724
Tokens
Oh yeah and one other thing I almost forgot, unless you go to some Saudi Arabian style of chopping heads off for drug dealing use etc (then you might stop it) it's an unwinnable war and therefore a futile waste of time and money.
When you make the public's recreational habits illegal you're just creating a profit for the underworld.
 

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS
Joined
Dec 21, 1999
Messages
3,061
Tokens
Kaya: ok, medical MaryJane--- Now, how do you prevent, detect self-medicated drivers? Keep in mind we're a car society with some exceptions-- not a small country with public transport everywhere,,, What about products manufactured under the influence?

Drug rehab doesn't work in most cases-- just like psychotic patients who don't take their medication, unfortunately what choice is there to confinement sometimes? Yes, the Rockefeller drug laws in NY are draconian....but sorry, there's gotta be a harsh deterrent sometimes. Take Mexico: they pride themselves on no death penalty & virtually no life imprisonment-- & they snidely call us violent cowboys. But, who is the civilized country among the two?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,724
Tokens
Not medical mary jane legalized taxed mary jane. It's less harmful than cigs and alcohol and it's the only drug with no physical addiction. It didn't even become illegal because of anything having to do with health risks is was a matter of hemp rope vs. nylon rope and big business interests. Also while not a good idea to smoke and drive much safer than drinking and driving and I'm sure they could come up with a test for driving under the influence.

How effectiveness of rehab is debatable on a case by case basis and we would surely be able to improve the sucess rate if we used some of the money wasted on fighting the unstopable source on coming up with more effective and better quality rehab.

Actually most of the civilized world and I believe all first world countries besides us have no death penalty. Most of them along with Mexico consider us violent cowboys. I would go so far as to debate Costa Rica as more civilized, despite increases in crime over the past few years.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
charleslanger said:
Kaya: ok, medical MaryJane--- Now, how do you prevent, detect self-medicated drivers?
As with drinking and driving, you don't outlaw the drinking part, just the mix of the two events. Call it an DWH, Driving While High, and impose the same penalties.

Keep in mind we're a car society with some exceptions-- not a small country with public transport everywhere,,, What about products manufactured under the influence?
Why are you not worried about people making products while hammered? It's the same approach as above, employers will fire you if you show up to work baked. Still not an argument to outlaw drugs.

Drug rehab doesn't work in most cases-- just like psychotic patients who don't take their medication, unfortunately what choice is there to confinement sometimes?
If someone is high on (insert name of drug here) and is walking along minding their own business not harming anyone, who's to care? If they start assaulting people, you simply charge them with assault.

Yes, the Rockefeller drug laws in NY are draconian....but sorry, there's gotta be a harsh deterrent sometimes. Take Mexico: they pride themselves on no death penalty & virtually no life imprisonment-- & they snidely call us violent cowboys. But, who is the civilized country among the two?
Mexico is not the only nation who has outlawed the death penalty, so your choice of countries is a bit disingenuous, don't you think? Canada has outlawed the death penalty, and is on the verge of decriminalising marijuana (possession of under 16 grams.) Vancouver has set up a safe injection site for addicts to keep them off the streets and prevent the spreading of infections via shared needles.

Between Canada and the US, which is the more civilised country?
 

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS
Joined
Dec 21, 1999
Messages
3,061
Tokens
Kayak: there is no deterrent in Mexico, because there is virtually no punishment.

& to boot, if you pay money you get out of anything you do. And the worst are the cops-- they're involved in ALL organized illegal goings on-- & do whatever else they want on their own. I have Mexican friends over there(i've also lived there) who carry guns over there & will not hesitate to shoot to kill any cop who steps out of line, esp. at night: there are some real bad ones at work-- the good ones are the ones that only rob you & nothing else.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,724
Tokens
And gangbangers hesistate to shoot cops? Didn't our culture produce the song body bag or cop killer or whatever it was?

The death penality has proven to be nothing more than expensive and ineffective. Besides the fact that it's the government setting a poor example.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
I was going to reply to this but xpanda already beat me to it and answered pretty much the way I was going to.....

We've spent billions and billions trying to stop a behavior that millions of people feel the need to do, whether legal or illegal time has proven they are doing it, and they will continue to do so. Crimes of consent are not going to go away, regardless how many billions are going to be thrown at eradication. We might as well be throwing the money into a bonfire, at least some heat could be generated to keep our hands warm. When something doesn't work by trying one thing to fix it, then wise minds realize that something else has to be done.

People steal to pay for the high costs related to thier drug habits, if it is legalized and therefore made affordable these crimes virtually disappear. That's less crime for the police to investigate and less crime for the courts to prosecute, less space taken up in prisons that could be used to house violent offenders who pose a real threat on society.

The street corner that gang members fight over to sell thier product is now turned back into a simple streetcorner because the user goes to a store to buy his supply. That's one less source of money to support criminal gangs....the dealers don't want the supply legalized. Does that tell you anything? You want to practically eliminate organized crime? Legalize crimes of consent.

The criminalization and prosecution of crimes of consent is an incredibly huge drain on societies, not only does it sponge up enormous financial resources, but it also prevents from benefitting from a huge source of incoming tax revenue. Billions and billions are spent when in fact billions and billions could be raised. Instead we try the same, tired, useless way.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,724
Tokens
"We've spent billions and billions trying to stop a behavior that millions of people feel the need to do, whether legal or illegal time has proven they are doing it, and they will continue to do so. Crimes of consent are not going to go away, regardless how many billions are going to be thrown at eradication. We might as well be throwing the money into a bonfire, at least some heat could be generated to keep our hands warm. When something doesn't work by trying one thing to fix it, then wise minds realize that something else has to be done."

Same reason making abortion illegal doesn't work.
 

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS
Joined
Dec 21, 1999
Messages
3,061
Tokens
As Johnny Carson would say: "Wrong, marijuana breaths!!!"

Legalizing drugs & making them available cheaply, plus eliminating drastic punishment aka death penalty will practically eliminate gangbangers, organized crime, and stealing?!?! What school taught you this-- or this part of the improved perception & awareness attributed to acid trips? Turn On, Tune In, Drop Out...........Niiiccceeeeeeeee, very nice!!!

90%, if not 100, of the population won't try drugs if made legal overnight? & all those people:

will not have decreases in work/school attendance / productivity?

will not become paranoid, delusional, psychotic, get cancer, strokes, heart attacks, diminished cerebral function, spread more communicable diseases, kill, maim, rape, etc. from the effects of the myriad steroid / performance substance, recreational drug, alcohol, prescription medicine combos?

Addicts will not steal, as they will still have sufficient money to buy the lower-priced drugs, pay rent, eat, purchase clothes, obtain medical treatment, support their kids?
And let me guess: we will fund all the drug subsidies & production, plus expanded Medicare / Welfare by downsizing current Corrections & Defense budgets, siphoning from current drug research funds, or just by rasing more taxes? Do we convert current croplands for this, impound public parkland, or import? Hey, maybe if we do the latter it will help feed the poor regions of the world, also mellow them out so they won't engage in terrorism, negatively affect their weapons use & production to cause them to misfire...

Gangs / syndicates will turn straight? No more protection rackets, cargo hijackings, jewelry / bank heists, counterfeiting, controlling unions, construction, skimming casinos?

Beautiful, f****** beautiful... what Einsteinian pearls of wisdom!!!

You should submit these theses to the Nobel Prize Foundation-- you might get a "Noble" cash award, while simultaneously performing the "noble" deed of saving the world. All together now:

We are the world, we are the children
We are the ones who make a brighter day
So lets get high.........
Theres a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
its true we'll make a better day
Just you and me!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
The reason they steal is to get money to support a habit that costs hundreds of dollars to maintain. When you legalize it and turn it into a $40 dollar habit all of a sudden they don't have to steal to support thier own habit.

Gangs and organized crime get into this racket because there is huge money for the taking, because of an artificially created black market created because the whole industry is illegal. You don't find gangs selling cheap booze on the streetcorner because, plain and simple, alcohol is legal and cheap and therefore there is no profit margin in selling alcohol. You will find gangbangers selling drugs on the corner and reaping thousands of dollars in profit for a days work, however. Enough profit to motivate gang wars and killings and drug ripoffs....these are all eliminated simply by legalization and effectively taking it off the streets. The gangbanger won't want to sell it when his profit gets cut out and the farmer won't want to mess with it when its 2 dollars a bushel.

There was a time in American history when prohibition of alcohol gave rise to characters like Al Capone and others who made huge profits selling alcohol. Once prohibition was lifted, this area of profit simply disappeared. People bought thier booze in the bars and didn't have to sneak around just to get a drink. You probably won't completely eliminate organized crime types, but why do you want to give them a lucrative field of operating from?

The world you invision is one where legalization turns everyone into a walking zombie, with a neverending high because drugs are legal......hardly the case, if this was true, everyone would be walking around in an alcoholic stupor. There are millions of people using and getting busted simply for the act of using......Frankly I could care less what these people do, as long as they don't hurt another person or another person's property then they should be able to do what they want with thier own time and body. This government imposed morality does little to curb the users desire, all it does is inflate the price and cause billions of dollars to be spent in enforcement and the courts and on society in general. For every drug user we put in prison, we have to take out someone else......I would rather see a child molester or rapist in prison than see a drug user take his place and end up with a child molester or rapist living on my block.

As far as the death penalty, that was some other poster condemning that. I've always been in favor of the death penalty, given that there is solid evidence of guilt with all the forensic sciences leading to that conclusion.

I don't use drugs, haven't even drank in like 12 years now, so I could care less whether its all legal or outlawed. It wouldn't effect my life in that sense.

What does effect my life, is when cops have to investigate drug related crimes and murders and then jamb up the already overloaded courts and prisons with users and dealers.....this all costs huge amounts of money, just for what, so we can kick some doors down and save a person from himself?

Bottom line: There's going to be users. Prostitution is the oldest business on the planet. Gambling is here to stay. You can outlaw it, drive it underground, and create huge industries which are all subversive and untaxed....this whole industry creates crime that reaches into society due to the monies involved with its participants, which leads to the spending of billions of dollars to uselessly try to eliminate it.

Or you can take a fresh approach the same as we dealt with alcohol, and realize that people want it, and are going to get it whether we try to stop it or not. Make it legal, regulate it, control it, and tax it and create an industrial asset instead of a worthless, money sucking pit on the public, like has already been created.

If you want to add to the insane spending and give criminals another lucrative, untaxed source of profit, then add alcohol back onto the list of illegal products.

The government can't control morality and personal behavior, if these people aren't hurting another person or another person's property, then they shouldn't be bothered by the government. The governments job is military self defense and running the infrastructure of the nation. Less government is better.
 

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS
Joined
Dec 21, 1999
Messages
3,061
Tokens
I agree one million percent re prostitution & gambling-- but not about drugs...not for a leading edge country anyhow-- not if there's to be a commitment to excellence, hard work, breaking up wars.... A smaller and/or laid back country is another story... Depends what type of society you want here-- Goodbye world if this economy dies off.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Tokens
You're assuming that the whole US population will be in a drug induced coma and wake up and go to work everyday with a 6 hour hangover.

There's liquor stores everywhere, you can buy alcohol in most grocery stores and gas stations.....there's porn stores in almost every decent sized city in America...am I supposed to surmise that every American is an alcoholic who sits around and looks at porn all day, and goes to work with a bottle of Jack in his coat pocket?

Now that there are offshores taking bets from gamblers, am I suppose to think that the whole US population is doing nothing more than sitting around looking at race forms and game lines?

There is a misperception that legalizing certain behaviors will lead to contaminating the whole population with the behavior. Time has proven this is not so. It has been proven with alcohol and it would also be proven with other behaviors of choice.

The users would continue to use the behavior of thier choice and the people who chose not to would be implementing thier own choice.

The reality is whether or not the government wants to continue to throw money away for more countless decades and centuries to come, or turn this into a regulatable, taxable asset for the public.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
charleslanger said:
90%, if not 100, of the population won't try drugs if made legal overnight? & all those people ... will not become paranoid, delusional ...
With all due respect, after having read the entirety of this post, methinks you might be the one who is paranoid and delusional.

Do you honestly think people don't do drugs just because they're illegal? Why isn't everyone in North America an alcoholic then? I've not resisted becoming a coke addict because it's illegal -- I've resisted it because I think it's stupid.

Your lack of faith in people to make reasonable, responsible decisions is rather sad. Maybe you needed a babysitter most of your adult life, but the majority of us do not.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
charleslanger

The assertion that many people would try drugs if they were legalised is not supported by fact, despite the popularity of this argument among the poorly-informed. I recommend this book if the subject is of interest, as it has ample information on both sides of the legalisation argument, both for and against, but both sides at least agree on those aspects which are factual rather than debateable.


Phaedrus
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,883
Messages
13,574,655
Members
100,880
Latest member
68gamebaiione
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com