The Democratic Party is the Real Racist Party in the US

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens

Racist Democrats vs. Colorblind Republicans
by John Hawkins





Sadly, Democrats have managed to trick a lot of black Americans into believing that the GOP is a racist party. But, in truth, the Democratic Party was, is, and will likely continue to be the home of far more racists than the GOP. Let me explain why I say that.

To begin with, the Republican Party was founded by anti-slavery activists, in contrast to the pro-slavery Democratic Party. It was Abe Lincoln, a Republican President, who led the North to victory in the Civil War and freed the slaves while the Democrats did everything in their power to keep black Americans down.

Fast forward to 1898 in Wilmington, N.C., where Democrats murdered black Republicans so they could stage, "the nation's only recorded coup d'etat." Then, in 1922, Democrats in the Senate filibustered a Republican attempt to make lynching a federal crime. A little later on, FDR nominated former Klansman Hugo Black to the Supreme Court. Contrast that to Republican President Dwight Eisenhower, who actually "sent troops" to ensure that schools in Little Rock, Ark., were desegregated and ordered the "complete desegregation of the Armed Forces." Noticing any trends?

But, that was such a long time ago, right? Things really changed in the '60s, didn't they? Yes, Americans -- particularly black Americans -- really owe Democratic President Lyndon Johnson a debt of gratitude for destroying American families and causing the number of illegitimate births to skyrocket -- by pushing entitlement programs that made it much easier to have children out of wedlock.

Remember George "segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever" Wallace standing in the door of an Alabama schoolhouse to keep black children from being able to go to school with whites? George Wallace was a Democrat. Remember Bull Connor turning water hoses and dogs on civil rights protestors? Bull Connor was a Democrat.

But, what about the revolutionary Civil Rights Act of 1964? That's where the Democrats showed their mettle and Republicans were proven to be racists. Right? Wrong. 82% of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 versus only 64% of Democrats. Furthermore, a few years later, it was Republican Richard Nixon who first put teeth behind affirmative action.

But, what about today? You'd think that with Democrats receiving upwards of 90% of the black vote in some cases, that there would be few, if any, prominent black Republicans while black Americans would be amongst the biggest power players in the Democratic Party. However, the opposite has often turned out to be true. Once you look past the gerrymandered districts that have to remain in place because so many liberal whites simply won't vote for black candidates (There are only five black Democrats in the House representing majority white districts), you'll see that the Republican Party has surpassed the Democrats in many areas.

Who's the only black American currently on the Supreme Court? Clarence Thomas. The first black Secretary of State? Colin Powell. The first black woman ever to be a Secretary of State? Condi Rice.

Who's one of the fill-ins for the most popular conservative radio host on earth, Rush Limbaugh? Walter Williams. The most desired 2008 nominee as selected by the right side of the blogosphere in 2006? Condi Rice. Who did those same bloggers select as the most desired nominee to replace Sandra Day O'Connor when she retired? Janice Rogers Brown tied for first place.

Meanwhile, what do we see from Democrats? We see Oreo cookies being thrown at Maryland's black U.S. Senate candidate Michael Steele and black Republicans being called "Uncle Toms" and compared to "Aunt Jemima."

Moreover, let's take a look at a couple of studies that actually set out to compare how racist Republicans and Democrats actually are. First off, a professor from Yale looked at voting patterns and she found that:
"...(W)hite Republicans nationally are 25 percentage points more likely on average to vote for the Democratic senatorial candidate when the GOP hopeful is black. ...In House races, white Democrats are 38 percentage points less likely to vote Democratic if their candidate is black."
It would have been interesting for them to poll black Republicans and Democrats as well, for comparison's sake, but however you slice it, there are a lot more white Democrats than white Republicans willing to defect to the other side rather than vote for a black candidate.

Then there is another study, this time from a professor at Stanford -- of how much government largesse Democrats and Republicans believe people deserved to be given after Katrina -- and, surprise, surprise: Democrats behaved in a racist fashion while Republicans didn't:
"But for Democrats, race mattered -- and in a disturbing way. Overall, Democrats were willing to give whites about $1,500 more than they chose to give to a black or other minority...." Republicans are likely to be more stringent, both in terms of money and time, Iyengar said. "However, their position is 'principled' in the sense that it stems from a strong belief in individualism (as opposed to handouts). Thus their responses to the assistance questions are relatively invariant across the different media conditions. Independents and Democrats, on the other hand, are more likely to be affected by racial cues."
Here's the reality: there are racists in both parties. But, there are a lot more of them in the Democratic Party and there always have been. But ironically, Democrats have managed to use the GOP's belief in a colorblind America against us. Because so many Democrats have no problem with using racial discrimination for political purposes, they'll support policies like reparations, Affirmative Action, and racial quotas that Republicans simply won't. Then they deftly distort and exploit incidents like the Katrina rescue efforts and Bill Bennett's condemnation of the idea that black babies could be aborted to reduce the crime rate to convince black Americans that the GOP hates black Americans.

This is all despite the fact that for a large number of black Americans, the GOP is a much better fit than the Democratic Party. The GOP is the party that's friendly to religion, anti-abortion, against gay marriage, tough on crime, and for low taxes and school vouchers. Yet, so many black Americans have been deceived into sticking with the Democrats even though the Dems do so many things that are harmful to our country as a whole and to black Americans in particular.

That's why if you're a black American who thinks the GOP better represents your views than the Democratic Party, then it's time to join the Republican Party. Don't let the Democrats lie to you and tell you that the GOP is full of racists, especially when there are so many distinguished black Americans out there who can tell you otherwise. Look to Condi Rice, Colin Powell, Rod Paige, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Larry Elder, J.C. Watts, Michael Steele, Ken Blackwell, Lynn Swann -- and you'll see that the GOP judges people not "by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
Same john hawkins that claimed that palin was more qualified than obama. you have a shitty reading list even for a dixican.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Same john hawkins that claimed that palin was more qualified than obama. you have a shitty reading list even for a dixican.

Typical, predictable donkey response. Too ignorant and stupid to
address the actual content of the article, must attack the author.

Why not add a KKK or Nazi slur like you usually do ass-clown?
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
same john hawkins that wrote that palin is more qualified than obama.

You have a shitty reading list. Even for a dixican.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
they need racial conflict to survive. You see, if the Dems only get 67% of the AA vote, they never win a national election.

Thus divide and conquer.

Who uses the expression Uncle Tom? Democrats when a black man is a conservative.

Too fucking weird
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
Typical, predictable donkey response. Too ignorant and stupid to
address the actual content of the article, must attack the author.

Why not add a KKK or Nazi slur like you usually do ass-clown?

Naming his other accomplishments is a slur? You dixicans have a strange way of looking at things.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
they're not sneaky, they're in the open about it.

they know the enablers will enabler and their boys got their back

no need for conservatives to make vague references and loose connections
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,544
Tokens
race isn't a R or D issue as they're both in on the game. This current issue with charging that any anyone who opposes our surpreme leader does so because they hate blacks is an attempt to ostracize that group. No different than der Fuhrer did to the Jews.

they will keep this up until the morons backing Bush's, and now Obama's, national socialism have decided that us dissenters need to be taken care of.
 

Everything's Legal in the USofA...Just don't get c
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
2,199
Tokens
Funny how just 2 years ago Colin Powell was considered "distinguished" in this article...a mere 18 months later he was branded by the right as someone who voted based on race.

I challenge you to show me ONE article or quote by any Republican of any standing that branded Colin Powell as someone who voted based on race.
 

Everything's Legal in the USofA...Just don't get c
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
2,199
Tokens
And let us not forget that good ole Democratgogue race baiter, Jimmy Carter.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...Carters-racist-campaign-of-1970-59499482.html

Jimmy Carter's racist campaign of 1970
By: David Freddoso
Commentary Staff Writer
09/16/09 3:54 PM EDT
Former President Jimmy Carter has created a stir today by alleging that those protesting and opposing President Obama's health care bill -- by some measures, up to 55 percent of the country -- are doing so because they cannot accept the idea of a black man in the White House. As The New York Times put it:

He lamented the tone of disrespect toward the current president, adding: “Those kind of things are not just casual outcomes of a sincere debate on whether we should have a national program on health care. It’s deeper than that.”

Setting aside the much greater disrespect shown by the Left at nearly every moment of former President George W. Bush's presidency, it is not unfair to suggest that Carter is attributing the same racial cynicism to others that he himself employed during his 1970 campaign for governor of Georgia.

Readers should refer to Stephen Hayward's The Real Jimmy Carter if they want a taste of the out-and-out racism that Carter employed in order to defeat moderate former Gov. Carl Sanders for the Democratic nomination that year. As Hayward's book points out:

Carter's top campaign staffers were spotted distributing grainy photographs of Sanders arm-in-arm celebrating with two black men. Sanders was a part-owner of the Atlanta Hawks, and in the photograph he was celebrating a victory with two players who were pouring champagne over his head. Carter's leaflet was intended to depress Sanders's white vote.
"The Carter campaign also produced a leaflet noting that Sanders had paid tribute to Martin Luther King, Jr."
Carter criticized Sanders, a former governor, for preventing Alabama Gov. and notorious segregationist George Wallace from speaking on Georgia state property. "I don't think it was right for Governor Sanders to try to please a group of ultra-liberals, particularly those in Washington, when it means stifling communication with another state," said Carter.
"'I have no trouble pitching for Wallace votes and black votes at the same time,' Carter told a reporter. Carter also said to another reporter, 'I can win this election without a single black vote.'"
Upon receiving the endorsement of former Democratic Gov. Lester Maddox, Carter responded by praising the life-long segregationist: "He has brought a standard of forthright expression and personal honesty to the governor's office, and I hope to live up to his standard." Maddox had not only refused to serve blacks in the restaurant he once owned, but he had also greeted civil rights protestors with a gun, and made sticks available to his white customers with which to intimidate them.
"The campaign paid for radio ads for a fringe black candidate, C.B. King, in an effort to siphon black votes away from Sanders."
"Then there was the radio commercial in which Carter said he would never be the tool of any 'block' vote, slurring over the word 'block' so that it could be mistaken for 'black.'
Carter won the Democratic nomination and the governorship -- unsurprisingly, with almost no black support. He famously did not carry the racism of his 1970 campaign into his governorship. That is laudable, but his campaign was not. Nor is it laudable for him today to attribute his own racial cynicism to others who have ample reasons for legitimate political disagreement with this president.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,114
Tokens
So when Republicans buy and wear buttons like these, and people running for the leadership party distribute cd's with songs like "Barack The Magic Negro" it's really just Dems that are pandering to racists? Holy shit, those sneaky bastages.

Funny how just 2 years ago Colin Powell was considered "distinguished" in this article...a mere 18 months later he was branded by the right as someone who voted based on race.

(Didn't BBlight post this same article....like 2 years ago?)
Powell endorsed Obama cross party what else would anybody think?..Its obvious...I wanted Powell for Prez at one time...Not anymore.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
Powell endorsed Obama cross party what else would anybody think?..Its obvious...I wanted Powell for Prez at one time...Not anymore.

If you call yourself a Republican, presumably because your political views tend to align with conservatives, then it's hard for me to comprehend how such a person can endorse a liberal's liberal. Obama is as far in left field as any man ever elected president, a conservative simply cannot find something in his policies to endorse.

Of course, if you think racial relations will take a giant step forward with his election, that is a plausible explanation in my book. But since race is being used on a daily basis by Obama supporters to defend Obama, that improve racial relations thing has been thrown under the bus.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
.... they will keep this up until the morons backing Bush's, and now Obama's, national socialism have decided that us dissenters need to be taken care of.

Is that when They will finally begin "going through our neighborhoods and communities and killing all freedom-loving Americans"*?

===


* --one of PPP's most dire Kook forecasts from earlier this year. I've been pestering him to narrow down the starting date for this genocidal pogrom so I could make sure and be out of town that day, but he's laying low. Maybe you've got the info I seek.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Obama is as far in left field as any man ever elected president, a conservative simply cannot find something in his policies to endorse.

Before November 2008, he publicly called for a CFB playoff system.

HTH
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,929
Messages
13,575,374
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com