temple +51/050.5 - is this a good 2 team teaser?

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
2,068
Tokens
Ok. I obviously know ZILCH about football, in any form. My play for tonight is actually Clemson -44 and the +51/u62 teaser for a kind-of-a-6-point-middle, for the purpose of clearing the last tidbit of a bonus rollover.

If that's stupid still, I'd seriously like to know why. Again, me stupid Canadian, know nothing about pigskin.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Messages
4,675
Tokens
winkyduck said:
btw - Pats i wish to aplogize to you sorta

you are NOT the biggest moron here - that "honor" goes to

HuskerFan1 for not only playing a 6-point tease but a 10 point tease. guess the "1" in his name is for his gambling IQ - although i doubt it is even that high

2nd on the list of idiots is

Matt Rain - for once again - making a tease and then posting it here

Pats - you are NOT the dumbest poster here - you are 3rd being Huskerfan (with an IQ of) 1 and then Matt Rain

Hey Winyduck F**k you back! I asked a question because I was not sure if it was a stupid play and that's why I decided to post. That's the point of this place, to help each other. Go back your hole loser.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
15,046
Tokens
With a spread like that,

WHY ONE EARTH WOULD YOU TEASE????????? Just bet the 2 team parlay. No need to tease
 

Pump n Dump
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Messages
4,671
Tokens
Clip Joint said:
Yea...I have 2 courtside seats. But as I mentioned in that thread, the weekend he is talking about I will be in Iowa. I have already sold off most of my tickets as I won't be making as many games this year.

Hey Clip,

Just curious, where in Iowa are you going? Been to Iowa before? Seeing anyone from the RX there?

Hope you enjoy your stay there(but I doubt you will, CA it isnt...haha).

:drink:
 

LA Clippers Junkie
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
11,323
Tokens
LEYKIS101 said:
Hey Clip,

Just curious, where in Iowa are you going? Been to Iowa before? Seeing anyone from the RX there?

Hope you enjoy your stay there(but I doubt you will, CA it isnt...haha).

:drink:

Quick trip (Thursday through Monday it looks like)...but yea, I have a hard time believing it will be enjoyable. LOL

I will be in the southeast corner of the state. I don't have any plans to meet anyone yet but I would love to meet up with any posters who may be in the area one night.

Maybe we could go cow tipping or sit in a cornfield? :missingte
 

I am sorry for using the "R" word - and NOTHING EL
Joined
Oct 21, 1999
Messages
9,024
Tokens
HuskerFan1 said:
dude i did it for shits n giggles...

its not a 6pt tease either moron...

once again - WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

so if i read this correctly - you basically said

"I made this play for the hell of it not caring if i win or lose"

THEN WHY PLAY THE GAME! ARE YOU THAT RICH YOU CAN AFFORD TO THROW AWAY MONEY LIKE THIS!?

this is beyond stupid what you posted - once again - people like you are why books are in business

WHENEVER YOU TAKE MONEY OUT OF YOUR POCKET IT IS NEVER FOR SHITS AND GIGGLES - IT IS REAL MONEY

i swear sometimes i wonder how people who make enough discretionary income to gamble so be so freaking dumb when it comes to giving their money away - and make no mistake about it - clowns like you are GIVING money away

instead of doing asinine stuff like this - why not do something more productive with your money. i have a 9 y/o nephew with Diabtetes - donate money to that cause or any other WORTHWHILE charitable cause. at least this way when you the money leaves your pocket you can get it back (in the form of a tax write-off) as opposed to the "chartible donation" you are making now with this play
 

I am the beetman, goo goo g'joob.
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
739
Tokens
What's the payout on that 2 team pleaser? I thought about making the same Clemson and over pleaser but none of my books would allow the side and total in the same pleaser, and none of my books have 2 team pleasers and I couldn't really think of a good third option.
 

I am sorry for using the "R" word - and NOTHING EL
Joined
Oct 21, 1999
Messages
9,024
Tokens
63-9 FINAL

GREAT Tease there buddy - NOT

and i don't wanna hear from HuskerFan (with an IQ of) 1 about how he WON this play by teasing it

NEVER confuse a winning play with a smart play - you made a STUPID play and while you somehow won this part of the teaser the play you made on temple was dumber than dumb and in the long run if you keep playing 10-point CFB teasers - especially on games with this kind of line - you won't have to worry about making any more bets - you won't have enough money to do so

as Sean1 said - you wanna make 10-point CFB teasers all the time - contact me - i will PERSONALLY book your plays. i don't have the money to pay you off but that won't be a problem because i won't need to - you will be sending me money EVERY WEEK
 

LA Clippers Junkie
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
11,323
Tokens
Perfect example of why you don't tease college football. If you want to tie plays together, parlay. The 6 points isn't nearly as important in college football as it is with the NFL.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,361
Tokens
beetman said:
What's the payout on that 2 team pleaser? I thought about making the same Clemson and over pleaser but none of my books would allow the side and total in the same pleaser, and none of my books have 2 team pleasers and I couldn't really think of a good third option.
5 to 1. Nice hit, Sean!
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
Pleasers pay 6 to 1.

Let me explain why these teasers are bad bets.

1. The value of pts in college football are too low to make the teaser payout worthwhile. If a 2 team teaser pays 1 to 1, you must win each side 70.7% of the time (Square root of .5) - I am not explaining the math behind this - just trust me.

In the NFL pts are worth more and there are some subsets that are profitable. Send me a case of beer and I will discuss further. Or read SSB book.

There may be some college games this year with the time change that could be profitable - it is not proven yet and they would be low total games.

I have run teasers over college data and before this year - NO subset is profitable.

2. Games with high totals or huge spreads make pts less valuable. Wouldn't you rather tease a Bears/Jaguars game from +2.5 to +8.5 than a Clemson Temple game to -51?

3. Your bet was anti correlated. A big dog is correlated to the Under. A big favorite is correlated to the Over. If Clemson wins by 51, there is a damn good chance the game goes O 70. If the game stays under 70, there is a damn good chance that Temple covers 51.

If none of this makes sense, stick to straight bets.


Sean
 

New member
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
4,821
Tokens
Thank you.

My much much bigger hit was Clem -24.5 parlayed to O30 1st half at a rogue books that takes these sorts of things... After reading the posts in this thread I see why a few books can still take these bets and remain in business.



Sean
 

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Messages
4,675
Tokens
sean1 said:
Pleasers pay 6 to 1.

Let me explain why these teasers are bad bets.

1. The value of pts in college football are too low to make the teaser payout worthwhile. If a 2 team teaser pays 1 to 1, you must win each side 70.7% of the time (Square root of .5) - I am not explaining the math behind this - just trust me.

In the NFL pts are worth more and there are some subsets that are profitable. Send me a case of beer and I will discuss further. Or read SSB book.

There may be some college games this year with the time change that could be profitable - it is not proven yet and they would be low total games.

I have run teasers over college data and before this year - NO subset is profitable.

2. Games with high totals or huge spreads make pts less valuable. Wouldn't you rather tease a Bears/Jaguars game from +2.5 to +8.5 than a Clemson Temple game to -51?

3. Your bet was anti correlated. A big dog is correlated to the Under. A big favorite is correlated to the Over. If Clemson wins by 51, there is a damn good chance the game goes O 70. If the game stays under 70, there is a damn good chance that Temple covers 51.

If none of this makes sense, stick to straight bets.


Sean


thanks for the explanation sean. I wasn't sure about it as I don't know much about correlated bets. Not my thing, I don't get that deep into it. And I did not bet it after i saw the responses in the thread. Congrats on your wins tonight
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,362
Tokens
sean1 said:
Pleasers pay 6 to 1.

Let me explain why these teasers are bad bets.

1. The value of pts in college football are too low to make the teaser payout worthwhile. If a 2 team teaser pays 1 to 1, you must win each side 70.7% of the time (Square root of .5) - I am not explaining the math behind this - just trust me.

In the NFL pts are worth more and there are some subsets that are profitable. Send me a case of beer and I will discuss further. Or read SSB book.

There may be some college games this year with the time change that could be profitable - it is not proven yet and they would be low total games.

I have run teasers over college data and before this year - NO subset is profitable.

2. Games with high totals or huge spreads make pts less valuable. Wouldn't you rather tease a Bears/Jaguars game from +2.5 to +8.5 than a Clemson Temple game to -51?

3. Your bet was anti correlated. A big dog is correlated to the Under. A big favorite is correlated to the Over. If Clemson wins by 51, there is a damn good chance the game goes O 70. If the game stays under 70, there is a damn good chance that Temple covers 51.

If none of this makes sense, stick to straight bets.


Sean

Thank you for explaining this in a calm, rational manner.

Winky, you know I like you but why go on a rant about this without making an explanation? If your going to call people stupid, the least you can do is explain why. We're here to help each other, not berate people when they unknowingly bet in ways they should avoid.
 

I am sorry for using the "R" word - and NOTHING EL
Joined
Oct 21, 1999
Messages
9,024
Tokens
HuskerFan1 said:
iused temple tonight in a couple 10pts just for action...i got them +55...like others said they could lose by a 100 tonight...just hoping clemson coach calls off the dogs in the 2nd half...

fwiw...used temple+55 vt +7.5 and ohiost-4
" " " " and UGA -3.5

WOW - what a shock - this teaser LOST

wow - bet none of us ever saw that coming?

hope all tyhe mental midgets who are stupid enough to even think about playing CFB teasers wipe their asses so they can get a good view of things since their heads are buried there

hiopefully HuskerFan (w/and IQ of) 1 realizes how STUPID it is to play teasers and stops doing it as well as the other losers in this thread who plays CFB teasers

i know you are free to do whatever you want with your money - but just keep track of how much you play on teasers in CFB - how those games and teasers would have turned out if you had just parlayed them - and you will see just HOW MUCH $$$$$$$$$$ your stupid teasers cost you
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
What is all that about Winky? Damn, the guy asked a question and wanted some input. That's it. Did berating him and using that sort of tone make you feel better about yourself? I sure hope you weren't trying to impress people by coming across like Billy Badass and embarassing this man. That was entirely uncalled for IMO.

And BTW since everyone seems to be a dumbass in your opinion what about starting with your buddy Kodiak if you want to correct someone. He told us one year his local let him buy a run for 10 cents when he played totals. That's just the beginning of it. Instead of pounding others who have done nothing to you and simply asked for opinions why not start by educating your hero next time. Thanks.
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
You can delete this Wil if you want, I'm sorry if I commented out of line. I just hate when someone attacks people like this for no good reason. The guy sincerely just asked for input, he didn't deserve that. What makes it worse is I am sure Winky was motivated to berate this man in hopes of trying to impress his pals at another site. No reason to swing by here and start shit with someone just for the hell of it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,313
Messages
13,458,861
Members
99,468
Latest member
nnhoa877
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com