TEAM USA vs. 2008 CELTICS

Search

Team USA vs. 2008 Boston Celtics

  • Celtics Win

    Votes: 8 36.4%
  • Team USA wins

    Votes: 5 22.7%
  • Team USA wins by 30

    Votes: 9 40.9%

  • Total voters
    22

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
Who wins, one with way more talent, the other with the "team" aspect....and not too shabby players either.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Voted for the Celtics. That defense can't be matched by Team USA. Celts know how to play with eachother. Team USA is a bunch of talented guys but they are not a team.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
Jake, I give you props, you have turned your fruity rumors, and you are spreading the gay-ness like wildfire
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Jake, I give you props, you have turned your fruity rumors, and you are spreading the gay-ness like wildfire

Only five more days till I can take this avatar off. Till then it's all Richard Simmons all the time baby.

PS...

Team USA 99
Boston Celtics 101
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
You speak of the defense, and you are calling out a 200 pt game?


ps... they only play 10 min qtrs
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
You speak of the defense, and you are calling out a 200 pt game?


ps... they only play 10 min qtrs

Forgot about the quarters.

And no matter the defense, it's hard to keep a team of capable scorers down over the course of a game. Nuggets are the best example I can think of where you have a team with a ton of individual studs who don't play a team game that well. Boston has the winning formula down.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
161
Tokens
Celtics easy.

They should have picked team USA around the Celtics. The big three and a few of the role players like PJ Brown and add a couple of point guards and rebouders and you have a TEAM that would WIN
 

PGA Professional
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
1,395
Tokens
Who wins, one with way more talent, the other with the "team" aspect....and not too shabby players either.

Weren't there any Celtics good enough or willing to play for USA?

I hate the Celtics but props to them and their championship an team defense.

:toast:
 

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
2,544
Tokens
Celtics for sure. Take a team that has played together for a whole year, against a team that has just been assembled and hasn't played together for a long time, and you will find the team that played together for a year will win almost every time. In the NHL old day, they would pit the Stanley Cup champs against the league all-stars for their all-star game. The Champs won every time.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
we have to start this up as an exhibition game....(okay, maybe not us personally)

I think this would make some money as a prime time event (kinda like those bighorn golf matches)
 

PGA Professional
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
1,395
Tokens
we have to start this up as an exhibition game....(okay, maybe not us personally)

I think this would make some money as a prime time event (kinda like those bighorn golf matches)

Except without the women right?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
2,418
Tokens
How about Team U.S.A. vs. Team Argentina, Team Yugoslavia, Team Puerto Rico, or Team Lithuania. After all all those teams allready beat us including Argentina twice.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
This is the dumbest fucking thread I've ever read in my life.


:lol:

What else would you expect when the top most posts trophies go to shdw01, Jake Thompson, and Dick Tator!


As silly as I thought the original question was, 8-5 isn't as lop-sided as some of the polls suggest. Seriously think this might draw some interest. (FWIW, I was real interested in the all-star game when the east went all detroit)
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
thank you. i was thinking the same.


FWIW, I voted Team USA.....

....but I think it would be close.

The biggest advantage Team USA has is the bench......but with 10 min quarters...bench not used as much....if Boston weren't so old....hmmm
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
The concept of the champion of a league playing against it's all stars from the rest of the teams is not that far fetched. The NHL did it for years when they were a six team league. The league expanded to 12 teams in 1966 and changed to the more common format that all leagues now use.

In the 1950 NHL All Star game The Montreal Canadiens beat the NHL All Stars 7-1. In 1959 the Canadiens won 6-1. The final game usng the champ vs all stars format in 1965 resulted in the all stars defeating the Canadiens 5-2. Gordie Howe was MVP.


wil.
 

Rx Senior
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
18,351
Tokens
Wil, you never sleep do you....i think head mod requirement is to be an insomniac!

The reason I posted (this stupid thread) is because this year is the first in awile that I can think of that won the championship with
1) lots of "superstars"
2) none of whom made the olympic team (not even KG)
and
3) no international players ont he championship team (that I can think of)

one of the few times I can think of where it is feasible AND summer of the olympics
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,865
Messages
13,574,261
Members
100,878
Latest member
fo88giftt
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com