Take away Brady's fumble..

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
Lol the play the NFL had to change a rule because of. Vereen wasn't eligible on this play. This play arguably won them a superbowl in my mind. Off a rule that didn't exist at the time.

Yes, nice job comparing something that did not exist before. Idiot!!!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,714
Tokens
Lol the play the NFL had to change a rule because of. Vereen wasn't eligible on this play. This play arguably won them a superbowl in my mind. Off a rule that didn't exist at the time.

LOL receiver has to cover tackle not the ball!


snapshot_20140921_132129.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,714
Tokens
yes he should of lined up a yard off the ball 8 men can't be on the line

and the Eagle should of lined up 2 yards farther forward to get on the line



LOL. No TE is covered therefore making him an ineligible receiver.



Section 5 Position of Players at the Snap
Article 1: Offensive Team
.
The offensive team must be in compliance with the following at the snap:
(a) It must have seven or more players on its line (3-
19
-1); and
(b) Eligible receivers must be on both ends of the line, and all of the players on the line between them must be ineligible
receivers.
(c) No player may be out of bounds.


Nice try there buddy.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
19,216
Tokens
LOL. No TE is covered therefore making him an ineligible receiver.



Section 5 Position of Players at the Snap
Article 1: Offensive Team
.
The offensive team must be in compliance with the following at the snap:
(a) It must have seven or more players on its line (3-
19
-1); and
(b) Eligible receivers must be on both ends of the line, and all of the players on the line between them must be ineligible
receivers.
(c) No player may be out of bounds.


Nice try there buddy.

guess you really haven't looked at the play or pic maybe when you'r sober tomorrow you will be able to focus and see it
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,714
Tokens
Dude you're still yapping YOU'RE WRONG!!! "8 men can't be on the line"



Section 5 Position of Players at the Snap
Article 1: Offensive Team
.
The offensive team must be in compliance with the following at the snap:
(a) It must have seven or more players on its line (3-

19
-1); and
(b) Eligible receivers must be on both ends of the line, and all of the players on the line between them must be ineligible
receivers.
(c) No player may be out of bounds.






SEVEN OR MORE MEANS YOU CAN HAVE 8 GUYS ON THE LINE!!
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
Dude you're still yapping YOU'RE WRONG!!! "8 men can't be on the line"



Section 5 Position of Players at the Snap
Article 1: Offensive Team
.
The offensive team must be in compliance with the following at the snap:
(a) It must have seven or more players on its line (3-

19
-1); and
(b) Eligible receivers must be on both ends of the line, and all of the players on the line between them must be ineligible
receivers.
(c) No player may be out of bounds.






SEVEN OR MORE MEANS YOU CAN HAVE 8 GUYS ON THE LINE!!

The Foles td they only had 6 on the line of scrimmage. Jeffreys was a minimum of a yard behind the right tackle. He is not considered on the line
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,714
Tokens
The Foles td they only had 6 on the line of scrimmage. Jeffreys was a minimum of a yard behind the right tackle. He is not considered on the line

Wow you're back for more you IDIOT!! Don't you see when you're clearly outmatched, or are you too dumb to comprehend! Minimum a yard behind really!?!?! Well here's the complete picture with the yard marks on the sideline!


eaglesline.jpg



You see the 3 yard line on the far sideline. Jeffreys foot is beyond the 3 yard line. Now do you see the 3 yard hash mark in the middle of the tackles' back. Jeffreys is lined up beside the tackle not a "minimum of a yard behind the right tackle" you fucking idiot!! Now go get your fucking shinebox!!
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,807
Tokens
It's over. Career Over. He choked.


He needs to do the right thing and acknowledge that all of the Pats success has been Belichick. Alex Smith would have won the same amount as Super Bowls

as dumb as they come, stick to your stupid racial ignorance, you're much better at that
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,303
Tokens
Wow you're back for more you IDIOT!! Don't you see when you're clearly outmatched, or are you too dumb to comprehend! Minimum a yard behind really!?!?! Well here's the complete picture with the yard marks on the sideline!


eaglesline.jpg



You see the 3 yard line on the far sideline. Jeffreys foot is beyond the 3 yard line. Now do you see the 3 yard hash mark in the middle of the tackles' back. Jeffreys is lined up beside the tackle not a "minimum of a yard behind the right tackle" you fucking idiot!! Now go get your fucking shinebox!!

Well buddy you were wrong but some of us knew that all along. Former head of officiating Mike Pereia said the officiating crew got the call wrong & specifically said Jeffery was lined up wrong. I will take the word of someone who actually knows all the rules & actually was in charge of officiating versus the opinion of a random watcher.

“I know the league came out and said that it’s a judgment call, which it is,” Pereira said, via Clark Judge of the Talk of Fame Network. “The down judge, who was the one that [the play] was on his side of the field, they felt that it was his judgment, and [receiver Alshon Jeffrey] was close enough. Well, he wasn’t. They lined up wrong.

Not only that, it’s a trick play. And if you’re going to run a trick-type play, then you have to be lined up properly. You could either have six men on the line, or you could have an ineligible number lined up at the end of the line, which was the case. I know what the league has said, but they would have been a lot more comfortable if they would have called an illegal formation.“We always use a yard [within the line of scrimmage], maybe a yard-and-a-half. But that’s two [yards], and even a little bit beyond two. It’s kind of one of those that has no effect on the play. I get it. But they didn’t line up properly. And it really should’ve been called."

https://sports.yahoo.com/mike-pereira-eagles-were-illegal-212901147.html

End of discussion
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,714
Tokens
Well buddy you were wrong but some of us knew that all along. Former head of officiating Mike Pereia said the officiating crew got the call wrong & specifically said Jeffery was lined up wrong. I will take the word of someone who actually knows all the rules & actually was in charge of officiating versus the opinion of a random watcher.

“I know the league came out and said that it’s a judgment call, which it is,” Pereira said, via Clark Judge of the Talk of Fame Network. “The down judge, who was the one that [the play] was on his side of the field, they felt that it was his judgment, and [receiver Alshon Jeffrey] was close enough. Well, he wasn’t. They lined up wrong.

Not only that, it’s a trick play. And if you’re going to run a trick-type play, then you have to be lined up properly. You could either have six men on the line, or you could have an ineligible number lined up at the end of the line, which was the case. I know what the league has said, but they would have been a lot more comfortable if they would have called an illegal formation.“We always use a yard [within the line of scrimmage], maybe a yard-and-a-half. But that’s two [yards], and even a little bit beyond two. It’s kind of one of those that has no effect on the play. I get it. But they didn’t line up properly. And it really should’ve been called."

https://sports.yahoo.com/mike-pereira-eagles-were-illegal-212901147.html

End of discussion


Exactly end of discussion! Pereia is clueless, "You could either have six men on the line," Ummm no you can't! You should have stopped right there! I don't care if Jesus Christ said this, it's wrong!! Read my above post straight out of the rule book! "that's two yards maybe beyond two" Clown can't see. Pic clearly shows 100% he is not beyond two yards or at two yards! The ball is at the one and one half yard line and Jeffrey's foot is clearly at the very least on the 3 yard line even closer! Look where the 3 and 1/2 yard line is and Jeffrey is 100% indisputable beyond the 3 and 1/2 yard line! Therefore not at two yards!! Plus watch the video, Jeffrey clearly checks in with the official, so it's a mute point anyhow. Jeffrey checks in, official ruled he lined up legally! That's what we always stress with our receivers always check in, and Jeffrey clearly does again rendering the whole issue, a non issue! Nice try however.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,303
Tokens
Give it up, you are some nobody on a sports gambling forum trying to say you know more than someone who used to be the head of officials in the NFL. Stop making yourself look even more clueless than you already are.

Next you will tell us you know more about performing surgeon compared to someone with actual experience.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,714
Tokens
Give it up, you are some nobody on a sports gambling forum trying to say you know more than someone who used to be the head of officials in the NFL. Stop making yourself look even more clueless than you already are.

Next you will tell us you know more about performing surgeon compared to someone with actual experience.


Why give up when I proved you wrong? I used want you presented and proved it wrong. Anything more? Like I said before it's a fucking MOOT POINT after Jeffrey's checks in! Ref tells him he's ok he cannot then flag him for illegal formation not even for the Patriots!! And there's no way given the evidence that Jeffrey's was two yards off the ball! And what does "you could either have 6 men on the line" tell you about that statement? The guy should think before he speaks. Get proven wrong by the facts resort to name-calling! Any evidence to add please do and I'll knock it right out of the park again! Play was legal end of discussion!
 

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
12,070
Tokens
horrible defense or great offense all throughout the game on both sides. Not seeing a scoring drive would have been surprising.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,303
Tokens
Why give up when I proved you wrong? I used want you presented and proved it wrong. Anything more? Like I said before it's a fucking MOOT POINT after Jeffrey's checks in! Ref tells him he's ok he cannot then flag him for illegal formation not even for the Patriots!! And there's no way given the evidence that Jeffrey's was two yards off the ball! And what does "you could either have 6 men on the line" tell you about that statement? The guy should think before he speaks. Get proven wrong by the facts resort to name-calling! Any evidence to add please do and I'll knock it right out of the park again! Play was legal end of discussion!

You proved nothing wrong and you DO NOT know more than what someone who did the job for a living did.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,714
Tokens
You proved nothing wrong and you DO NOT know more than what someone who did the job for a living did.

Stop it you're making a fool out of yourself! It's as clear as day I proved you wrong! You just don't want to admit it! Just because a former ref did it for a living does not make him infallible! So given your logic all the refs on the field during the Super Bowl are doing the job for a living, does that mean they can't make a mistake?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,317
Messages
13,458,940
Members
99,469
Latest member
onetreestays
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com