I have always questioned the validity of “Syndicate Plays” because they are often misunderstood. Many assume that the word syndicate indicates a connected play from wise guys or a play that has information you don’t know about. Not the case in most situations. Some “Syndicates” are nothing more than a group of individuals with money that combine it for buying power and although they try to move the line with it and take advantage of it they often rarely do it or it does not play a role unless they achieve a middle over a key number something smart books will avoid at all cost. If they do achieve a middle over a smart number than it does not matter what side they are on just if the middle hits. Also I would imagine posting your play in a popular forum would be the last thing a “syndicate” would want UNLESS it was to get more money on a side to help with their middle and in that case they are not on a team at all but looking to get the middle. In the case that it was a “wise guy” thing than I am sure the last thing they would want is their play posted ANYWHERE because it would only hurt the line in the game they are looking at.
eX
eX
I have to dispute something..I mean I only am doing this because I don't want something that I believe is legit, twisted or turned or whatever..I have tried several times to compare "notes" with Dimes and have never been able to..Yesterday I know for a fact that one of the largest plays that the Syndicates played so far this year was the Dolphins and were extremely "heavy" on the Yanks. Now I'm not saying that anyone is giving out false info, but giving plays that a local shop says is from "smart" money makes me wonder how big the smart money is (i.e. what might be alot of money on a game with a local shop, does not mean it is necessarily the largest play of the year) and how solid the info is from the shop.. Another example was this past Saturday when you posted that Syndicates were large, heavy, etc. on the Wisky/Buckeye over, when in fact every single source (syndicate) I checked had the Under in that game? Anyway, not tryin to get things started up but I don't want to work hard tracking Syndicate action only to have people skeptical because they see some plays that are opposites are totally differnt games. In the case of a small or medium play I understand you can get info on both sides because they try and "middle" alot of times, but when you list a Large or Biggest move of the year type play then the "middle" factor doesn't apply..I know there a bunch of Syndicate plays out there and some of ours match (Dimes and me) but most of the times they don't so I hate addressing this in the thread but I have tried to get you to reply to me by e-mail or whatever..Well, rest assured if I list a Syndicate play that it is from a "solid" source and it is (99%) usually a Large or X-Large type of play. They want win all the time, but you usually can play them with confidence..Good luck to all, and I hope that everyone on here understands that I am in this with you guys, sharing info so we can all be winners! So with that said I hope there is a way we can compare info with each other and determine what are the strongest sides to play from our sources.
Good luck to all,
DAWG
Good luck to all,
DAWG
dawg's syndicate plays are legit -- i have occassional opportunities to get syndicate plays from an acquaintance (he's far too busy to give them to me all the time), but dawg's play have always coincided with what my source has given me. it always made me feel very comfortable with both the info from my source, and what dawg was posting.
keep up the good work!
GL
keep up the good work!
GL
