Supreme Court Upholds First Nationwide Ban on an Abortion Procedure

[TheVolFan]

I didnt say that.

I am taking a guess at the age of the baby in the pic and making a point.

Making a point, something you just failed at.

The age of the baby is meaningless (That is my point)... you are saying that you dont advocate LATE term abortions.

My point is... where do u draw the line? 5 months? 6 months? Did God inform you when it was ok to kill a baby, and when its not?

It's actually a very simple point I am making... I think.

 

[steaktartar]

Steak, my man, you need to dumb down your jokes, otherwise these nitwit libs won't get them.

uppy:

:lolBIG: TOUCHE

 

[bigtendominator]

Why the fuck don't you people then adopt all of these fucking kids? I haven't heard of Fred trying to adopt any kids or Alito or the rest of these Bible beaters!

You are all so worried about running everyone else's life. Last time I checked it was the bible belt that has the poorest states and the stupidest people, i.e. Miss, AL, LA, Arkansas. To busy trying to protest abortions, instead of worrying about improving your schools and maybe helping to bring some sort of industry to these states instead of gambling.

 

[JoeContrarian]

Why the fuck don't you people then adopt all of these fucking kids? I haven't heard of Fred trying to adopt any kids or Alito or the rest of these Bible beaters!

You are all so worried about running everyone else's life. Last time I checked it was the bible belt that has the poorest states and the stupidest people, i.e. Miss, AL, LA, Arkansas. To busy trying to protest abortions, instead of worrying about improving your schools and maybe helping to bring some sort of industry to these states instead of gambling.

"Instead of gambling?" :WTF: You post on gambling board and you're against gambling?

:nono5:

 

[bigtendominator]

The age of the baby is meaningless (That is my point)... you are saying that you dont advocate LATE term abortions.

My point is... where do u draw the line? 5 months? 6 months? Did God inform you when it was ok to kill a baby, and when its not?

It's actually a very simple point I am making... I think.

Looks as if you have direct phone line to God. Can you share that phone number for us.

Looks as if Phil Fulmer has been getting a busy signal since 1998.

 

[RobFunk]

Steak and Joe, give it up. If there was some kind of deep seated humor worth seeing there, I am pretty sure I would have saw it. But you guys are just being weird and not that funny, only to each other. Good to see the lib and the neo-con doing the whole :toast: thing. Just super.

Volfan, if there is no baby, what is the problem? I am almost certain that after you go sleep with whatever girl and the moment she discovers she is pregnant it doesnt look like what is depicted in Joe C's posted photo.

 

[bigtendominator]

Wtf? Instead of gambling? You post on gambling board and you're against gambling?

:nono5:

i am not against gambling. I am saying that there are other industries. Just because I am pro-gambling does not make it good for everyone else. Why is that only the indigent states seem to be ardent supporters of gambling?

 

[JoeContrarian]

i am not against gambling. I am saying that there are other industries. Just because I am pro-gambling does not make it good for everyone else.

Ah, so it's okay for YOU to gamble but not for other people? Gotcha.

Just like it's okay for Rosie O'Donut to have an entourage of body guards armed to the teeth, but the rest of us are supposed to defend ourselves with pencils; just like it's okie dokie for Al Gore and John Fraud Kerry to travel the world in Gulfstream jets, but the "little people" can't drive their SUVs....

Thanks for playing, twit. Don't you have a Michael Moore rally to attend?

 

[bigtendominator]

Let me rephrase. What I am saying is that gambling maybe a suitable outlet for certain people. However, that does not make it a viable option for everyone else.

Just like abortion, you maybe opposed, so than why should everyone be required to follow suit with what you say. So, whatever you say and do is correct?

 

[bigtendominator]

How many kids have you tried to adopt in the last year?

0

 

[JoeContrarian]

Anyway, since I'm not God and since science can't prove when life begins one way or another, it's best to err on the side of caution -- except of course in the case where a pregnancy is endangering the mother's health = self defense and well within her rights.

Other than that, ALL abortions should be illegal -- and don't let any activist judge tell you otherwise.

As a matter of fact, in the case of life and death having to choose between mother and child, many men who quickly grow tired of their modern nagging "have her cake and eat it too" feminazi wives, would opt for the former and not the latter.

 

[bigtendominator]

You still didn't answer my question, how many kids have you tried to adopt?

I will let you throw in family and friends also ( i am assuming they are of the same belief).

 

[JoeContrarian]

No need to personalize the debate, as it is COMPLETELY irrelevant to whatever point you're trying to make...but....I'm adopted.

Next question, please.

:howdy:

 

[bblight]

It bans only a certain type of procedure, Joe. The kind of procedure that less than 1% of 1% of all abortions fall under. The ban does not even address the 'when does life begin' debate that you so desperately want to see overturned.

Just another carrot for you conservative fuckwits to keep you voting for the "Culture of (some) Life" Party.

Hey dippydoo - not all of us nitwits support a ban on all abortion - but it must be agreed that this particular form of abortion was heinous, actually murdering babies that could have lived unassisted outside of the womb.

I don't like abortion - I think that too many people look at it as a form of birth control and not as the last ditch measure that it should be.

However, I also support a womans right to choose - the woman has to live with herself afterward. Then again, I think of my two beautiful grandchildren and I get sick at the thought that abortion is even allowed.

This is one of those subjects that will never go away - how do we correctly, morally, ethically choose between the rights of the woman to choose and the right of a child to live?

 

[Massmilwaukee]

it's best to err on the side of caution

Except when going to war... then throw caution to the wind and dive off the board in the shallow end.

 

[FatTony]

Its vague now(....kinda like me huh) but I'm pretty sure someone posted there were 28 of these procedures in the whole of America in one year.

compared with about 1 million abortions p.a.

Since many of these abortions will be blacks and poor people I'm surprised that the Republicans don't celebrate and encourage this kinda thing...
I reckon that most are only really against it as long as it doesn't stop.

Great point!!!

I never understood why Republicans are so against abortions when it means more poor people having children, Welfare going up, taxes in general going through the roof.

I guess they need more people for the military.

 

[JoeContrarian]

Btw, Canada is the ONLY civilized nation in the world without an abortion law. As far as the legaleese is concerned, there is no "partial birth abortion," it's all the same. Life begins after the fetus exists the womb, end of story. How the hell anyone could just arbitrarily make that call is beyond any human with common sense but we can be sure Xpanda is proud.

This is the kind of bullshit that happens when people don't care about politics (Canadians are the most apathetic bunch on the planet) and allow the elites to think for them.

 

[JoeContrarian]

This is one of those subjects that will never go away - how do we correctly, morally, ethically choose between the rights of the woman to choose and the right of a child to live?

You know I hate to disagree with you bblight, but the way to make this subject go away is for Republicans to stop bickering and fight: get their asses into gear and unite, electing pro-life presidents, pro-life congressmen and pro-life judges. Only then will Roe v. Wade will be exposed (and disposed) for the unconstitutional holocaust it is.

This ruling is a good first step. You can be DAMN SURE Olive Oyl (Ginsburg) voted against it.

 

[t3a]

Not in this case. Partial birth abortion is so rare it's almost a non-issue. And I've never believed they should be performed for any reason other than to protect the mother's physical health anyway.

I'm simply pointing out to Joe that this ban does not address the real abortion debate and will not affect 99% of the abortions performed. It's just Republican Party posturing. As per usual.

Abortion is to Republicans what the race card is to Democrats.

Let's see if an expert on political posturing has any comments. From Hillary Clinton's website:

From the Senate: Statement on Supreme Court's Gonzales v. Carhart Decision
Washington, DC -- "This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman's right to choose and recognized the importance of women's health. Today's decision blatantly defies the Court's recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito."

I guess she doesnt think "Partial birth abortion is so rare it's almost a non-issue"

 

[JoeContrarian]

HILLARY: 'Erosion of our constitutional rights'...

GIULIANI: 'I agree with it'...

OBAMA: 'I strongly disagree'...

ROMNEY: 'A step forward'...

MCCAIN: I'm very happy...

EDWARDS: 'I could not disagree more strongly'...

Hehehe....how predictable.