Support for Suicide Killers and Osama Remains High among Many Muslims

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
[ Some more astounding stats about Islam for the ignorant left to
ignore ]



Support for Suicide Bombings and Bin Laden Still High Among Some Muslims
Friday, September 11, 2009
By Patrick Goodenough, International Editor
53867.jpg

Palestinian supporters of Hamas attend a rally in Gaza City on Sunday, Dec. 14, 2008, marking the group's 21st anniversary. (AP Photo)
(CNSNews.com) – A new survey gauging Muslim attitudes indicates that backing for suicide bombings against civilians, while generally down from earlier years, remains significant in some Islamic countries – challenging the assertion that Muslims supporting terrorism constitute a “tiny minority.”

In the Pew Global Attitudes Project poll released on Thursday, 68 percent of Palestinian Muslim respondents said suicide bombings against civilians were justifiable “to defend Islam from its enemies.”

That view was shared by 43 percent of respondents in Nigeria and 38 percent in Lebanon, where 51 percent of Shi’ites held the view compared to 25 percent of Sunnis.

Elsewhere, the proportion of Muslim respondents supporting suicide bombings against civilians was 15 percent in Egypt, 13 percent in Indonesia, 12 percent in Jordan, seven percent in Israel (Muslim Arab citizens), five percent in Pakistan and four percent in Turkey.

Of the eight countries polled, support for suicide bombings increased since last year in five of them.

On the other hand, this year’s results show a decline over the period since 2002.

Pakistan recorded the most striking drop: In 2004, 41 percent of respondents justified suicide terrorism, whereas the number recorded this year was five percent. Terrorism has surged in Pakistan since 2007, and this year alone, at least 750 people had been killed and 2,276 injured in 365 bombings inside Pakistan as of the end of August, according to figures compiled by the South Asia Terrorism Portal in New Delhi.

The Pew survey also found although majorities in Nigeria (54 percent) and the Palestinian territories (52 percent) expressed “confidence in the al Qaeda leader [Osama bin Laden] to do the right thing regarding world affairs.”

In the other countries surveyed, the Saudi terrorist enjoyed the backing of 28 percent of respondents in Jordan, 25 percent in Indonesia, 23 percent in Egypt, 18 percent in Pakistan, 16 percent in Israel, four percent in Lebanon and two percent in Turkey.

The biggest drop in support for bin Laden was measured in Indonesia (down 34 points since 2003), Jordan (down 28 points) and Pakistan (down 28 points). The trend in Nigeria was in the opposite direction – up 10 points since 2003.

‘Tiny minority’

The poll comes amid reports that the New York Police Department – after taking flak from Muslim organizations – has inserted into a key report on terrorism a “statement of clarification,” saying among other things that “a tiny minority of Muslims … subscribe to al-Qaeda’s ideology of war and terror.”

The two-page statement has been added to a report first drawn up by two NYPD intelligence analysts in 2007 and reportedly used by government agencies around the U.S. The report is entitled “Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat.”

The report examines the jihadist ideology, inspiration provided by al-Qaeda, and the process of radicalization, including political, social, economic and personal factors that can act as catalysts. It also highlights the role of the Internet in disseminating the jihadist ideology.

When the report first came out, it caused a stir among Islamic organizations. In response, some came together to form the Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition (MACLC), which late last year released a critique.

In it, MACLC said the NYPD report “presents a distorted and misleading depiction of Islam and its adherents,” calls their loyalties and motivations into question, and “erroneously associates religious precepts with violence and terror.”

It contested the NYPD’s argument that the threat of “Islamic-based radicalism” was growing, calling it unsubstantiated and speculative.

To back up that position, MACLC cited a 2008 Gallup Center for Muslim Studies survey which found that across 10 Muslim-majority nations, the radicalized group – those saying 9/11 was “completely justified” and voicing an unfavorable opinion of the U.S. – comprised “about seven percent of the total population.” (Seven percent of 1.3 billion, the estimated number of the world’s Muslims, is 91 million).

The “statement of clarification” now inserted by the NYPD points out that the report focuses on terrorism in the West, inspired by and linked to al-Qaeda.

“The twisted ideology that underpins this specific type of terrorism claims its
legitimacy from an extremist misinterpretation of Islam. As a consequence, this particular type of terrorist ideology has historically found most of its supporters to be Muslim.

“Nevertheless, NYPD understands that it is a tiny minority of Muslims who
subscribe to al-Qaeda’s ideology of war and terror and that the NYPD’s focus on al-Qaeda inspired terrorism should not be mistaken for any implicit or explicit justification for racial, religious or ethnic profiling.”

In a letter to NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly this week, MACLC welcomed the appearance of the “statement of clarification” but said the police department needs to do more to publicize the move, which it said had apparently been made “without any public announcement.”

It also argued that the report itself remained unchanged, and said it regretted that the statement of clarification “was relegated to an insert within the report, rather than being implemented throughout the text itself.”

MACLC raised several other unresolved concerns, saying the report “should more clearly state that there is no per se link between Islam and terrorism and that the report’s focus on al-Qaeda should not be read to suggest such a link.”
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Why does the cited article refer to "...some Muslims", but the Topic title here at the Rx insists on "....many Muslims.."
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Why does the cited article refer to "...some Muslims", but the Topic title here at the Rx insists on "....many Muslims.."


For example:

68 percent of Palestinian Muslim respondents said suicide bombings against civilians were justifiable “to defend Islam from its enemies.”


The Pew survey also found although majorities in Nigeria (54 percent) and the Palestinian territories (52 percent) expressed “confidence in the al Qaeda leader [Osama bin Laden] to do the right thing regarding world affairs.”
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Oh...so in Palestine and Nigeria...That leaves about 1.5 billion Muslims in other countries. Now I know why the article headline used the word "some".

thanks
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Oh...so in Palestine and Nigeria...That leaves about 1.5 billion Muslims in other countries. Now I know why the article headline used the word "some".

thanks

Wow.. you debunked the whole article just like that didn't you?

You are amazing.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Brother, I just asked a question. The article stated "some Muslims" and you opined "...many Muslims".

Upon review of the article, I can understand why the original writers used the word "some". As to why you selected your descriptor, I remain puzzled
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Brother, I just asked a question. The article stated "some Muslims" and you opined "...many Muslims".

Upon review of the article, I can understand why the original writers used the word "some". As to why you selected your descriptor, I remain puzzled

Personally, I think the word "Many" in the title better fits the content
of the article. Your opinion obviously differs, and you are indeed
entitled to such.

Onto more pressing issues, what's going on with Boston and Tampa
tonight?
 

Rx. Junior
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
5,446
Tokens
Yeah, just like impressionable American believe the brainwashing that Islam is out to get them, the Muslims in other parts of the world are being convinced that America is out to wipe out Islam. Funny how it works.

America goes over and like common terrorists takes over Iraq so people can't be blamed for being hostile against the U.S. and viewing them as evil.

You don't just go over to a country and take it over. How do other countries know some dumb moronic president won't make a lame excuse and take over their country next? A lot of nuclear threats out there. Afghanistan was easy. Iraq was worse but not too difficult either but it's not always going to work out that way.

Americans sit around and complain that Islam is out to get them. Muslims in other parts sit around saying the west is out to wipe out Islam. Everybody living in their own world. Everybody worried about their own rooms but nobody worried about the house as a whole(earth) Who cares about the rooms if the house falls down.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Brother, I just asked a question. The article stated "some Muslims" and you opined "...many Muslims".

Upon review of the article, I can understand why the original writers used the word "some". As to why you selected your descriptor, I remain puzzled

pettifogger :>(
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,947
Messages
13,575,496
Members
100,887
Latest member
yalkastazi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com