Super Bowl Plays

Search

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
Seattle +2.5(-105)
Seattle ML (+115) Took both of these for an equal amount. If I do need the points, which is unlikely, it'll give me a break even day(also unlikely). Seattle opened at -1 or at a pick, and the money came pouring in on Denver. The books should have opened at Denver -3 or 3.5 and they still would have had plenty of Bronco plays. Maybe this line goes to Seattle +3, but I doubt it. The linesmakers know what they're doing and opened this at pretty much an even game.

Denver and Peyton have so much public love. Not many outside of Seattle know much at all about this Seahawk team. Their perception might be that they are great at home, play good defense and that's about it. 78% of the bets are on Denver and this % might increase by game time. If it does go to 3 or better, I'll increase my play. Here are some of my reasons this play makes sense:

1. Neutral field, Metlife Stadium. It'll likely be cold, it's almost always windy, and Seattle should have an advantage with the weather. Peyton has never been that good in poor weather while Seattle plays in it all the time. Manning also doesn't have the zip on his passes he used to(although his skills are still exemplary) and the wind, weather could affect his effectiveness. Seattle is a run first team that will not be as adversely affected by the wind.

2. Seattle's defense is special, not just pretty good. They have incredible depth at almost every spot. The secondary and DL are their best units. The secondary can single cover better than any team in the NFL. This will enable them to blitz occasionally and hurry Manning. If they don't hurry Manning sometimes, they're idiots and don't deserve to win. If New Orleans is a good comparison to Denver, Seattle handled their offense very, very well for 2 games.

3. Denver's defense is not what it should be. Without the many injuries, it is better than average, maybe top 10. Seattle has struggled far more vs. teams with really stout defenses- like Arizona and SF. I think Seattle's offense will be an underrated factor in this game. Reminds me almost of the Tampa-Oakland Super Bowl, or other big games which escape my mind for now. Percy Harvin should play, and Russell Wilson will finally face a much weaker defense than the ones he's faced for the past 4-5 weeks. With 2 weeks to prep, and this being the final game, you'll see Wilson become more mobile, be more likely to run, and generally give Denver's defense fits at times. Just a prediction, but Wilson will be the difference maker in this game.

4. Peyton Manning winning the Super Bowl in Eli's home park, the Manning comeback story, blah, blah, blah- the whole perfect story element here will be used by Seattle. They are under the radar, the underdogs and no one expects Manning to lose in this possible last hurrah. The pressure is off and this team thrives on being in this role.

5. In the past Super Bowls, I don't have the stats on it, but I believe teams with superior defenses have done very well. Peyton will have to have an almost perfect game, in my opinion, to win here.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
1,813
Tokens
As usual, your write up is excellent and we all appreciate it. Anyway, there has been 4 occasions in the history of the NFL with #1 offense vs #1 defense and #1 defense is holding a record of 3-1. Any insights on the total?

tex
 

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
595
Tokens
I really think your #1 is the real #1 in analyzing this game. If it is 40 and dry with little wind, I would consider this game much differently than 32 and wet. I think people are being premature in putting in action before this factor is known.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
It is almost always windy in Metlife in the winter. That's a bigger factor for a passing team than cold and wet. On Feb. 2 it is likely to be cold and windy in Metlife- but you never know.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
As usual, your write up is excellent and we all appreciate it. Anyway, there has been 4 occasions in the history of the NFL with #1 offense vs #1 defense and #1 defense is holding a record of 3-1. Any insights on the total?

tex
I lean to the under, but I likely won't touch it. I'll be hoping the line jumps to 3, but I'm not paying extra juice to get it.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
903
Tokens
I really think your #1 is the real #1 in analyzing this game. If it is 40 and dry with little wind, I would consider this game much differently than 32 and wet. I think people are being premature in putting in action before this factor is known.

I agree if you're playing Denver. If you are playing Seattle, then now is the ideal time to get this +3 line. If shitty weather comes into play, then the buy back on Seattle will start and likely be significant. I don't Seattle getting more than 3, so getting that this far ahead is not a bad move if that's who you like.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
835
Tokens
I lean to the under, but I likely won't touch it. I'll be hoping the line jumps to 3, but I'm not paying extra juice to get it.

No way I'd touch the total here. Liking Seattle and that's enough!

Vols
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
I also expect both teams, having two weeks to prepare, to bring some new wrinkles to this game. For Seattle, a team that doesn't blitz much, I think you'll see some added pressure on Manning. Also, like Kapernick did for SF in the championship game, you'll see some designed runs and rollouts for Russell Wilson. Denver will try to stack the box to stop the run and dare Wilson to beat them passing- which I feel he can do. They'll also try to scheme offensively a way to penetrate the Seattle defense- but everyone else has tried this too, with little success. As for the weather, we'll see.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
789
Tokens
Gents,

Also interesting to note that SEA has played 7 pf their 18 games vs. some of the stoutest defenses in the league hence hampering their offensive #'s somewhat ie. # 2,3,4 and 7...SF(2),AZ(2),NO(2) and CAR.

Compare that to DEN facing SD, KC and NYG as their toughest defensive foes.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
Gents,

Also interesting to note that SEA has played 7 pf their 18 games vs. some of the stoutest defenses in the league hence hampering their offensive #'s somewhat ie. # 2,3,4 and 7...SF(2),AZ(2),NO(2) and CAR.

Compare that to DEN facing SD, KC and NYG as their toughest defensive foes.
Thanks for the info. St. Louis also had a fairly good defense and they played them twice.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
Have won the past two posted(on the RX) Super Bowls. Two years ago I had a huge play on the Giants. This year I'm having the same gut feeling that Seattle will win this, maybe by a TD or more. Some Vegas books are asking for extra juice on the 2.5, which I find unusual. Usually you pay it for the 3. The offshore books are being even more stingy, some dropping the line to 2. Pinnacle and Betfair, two of the sharper books, are at 2. I'm getting the sense that they all want Denver money even though 78% of the bets are already on Denver. And Denver bettors can get ALL they want at less than a FG. I'm also starting to think that this is never going to go to 3 at the normal juice. I know Bovada has it at 3, but they are known for being generous with underdog bettors. On the verge of making this one HUGE.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
Seriously thinking of taking a 3rd bet, Seattle -3 at +168. In the past week, nothing has swayed my thinking that Seattle will win this game. The millions of square bets on Peyton Manning are yet to come, some between friends at Denver -4 or -7( I already have one of each). I'll be also looking at/ hoping for +3 with the real books, and increase my play accordingly. This Super Bowl could be getting expensive…. but more likely profitable.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Messages
2,884
Tokens
Hate to go against you o fred but found DEN at a pk early and will roll with that. The SB is not really a handicapping event, imo. It supersedes all normal methods of analysis. Past NFL SB players have, in unison, commented on how this game was different than any other game. Experience is king. Peyton's past trips to the show and winning I think is valuable.

Your insights this season have been invaluable. Thank you for maintaining such a valuable and informative thread.

If I don't win the DEN bet...I will be glad that you and your followers will.

bol all
 

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
8,193
Tokens
Hate to go against you o fred but found DEN at a pk early and will roll with that. The SB is not really a handicapping event, imo. It supersedes all normal methods of analysis. Past NFL SB players have, in unison, commented on how this game was different than any other game. Experience is king. Peyton's past trips to the show and winning I think is valuable.

Your insights this season have been invaluable. Thank you for maintaining such a valuable and informative thread.

If I don't win the DEN bet...I will be glad that you and your followers will.

bol all
there are only 4 Denver players, including Manning, that have SB exp. not a plethora of exp. there either... just saying...

experience wont matter.... defense will.... so Seahawks...!
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
Hate to go against you o fred but found DEN at a pk early and will roll with that. The SB is not really a handicapping event, imo. It supersedes all normal methods of analysis. Past NFL SB players have, in unison, commented on how this game was different than any other game. Experience is king. Peyton's past trips to the show and winning I think is valuable.

Your insights this season have been invaluable. Thank you for maintaining such a valuable and informative thread.

If I don't win the DEN bet...I will be glad that you and your followers will.

bol all
Glad the write ups have been of help. The RX used to be full of them. Super Bowls are a unique game and almost apart from the analysis applicable to the rest of the season(like college bowl games). As for experience, I think Manning's expertise as a QB is far more important than SB experience- for this or any game. However, I can think of plenty of Super Bowls where an less experienced team defeated the more experienced team. And as good and hyped as Manning is for this game, I think that gives a point spread advantage to Seattle. This is a game of many players, coaches, etc. Great QBs have lost many, many big games- while great defenses(and my contention is that this Seahawk one is better than past #1 defenses and a large part of the reason I'm on Seattle) lose less in these types of games. I also think Russell Wilson will be a major factor in this game, and will shine. Anyways, thanks all year for your positive feedback.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
Pinnacle at 1.5 and Bookmaker at 2, two offshore books that take professional money. Got a sense that Vegas lines will start to move there tomorrow. And by Sunday all books will be close to -1 or pick.

Added: Seattle-3 at +161. About 15% of my total outlay.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2013
Messages
214
Tokens
Pinnacle at 1.5 and Bookmaker at 2, two offshore books that take professional money. Got a sense that Vegas lines will start to move there tomorrow. And by Sunday all books will be close to -1 or pick.

Added: Seattle-3 at +161. About 15% of my total outlay.

Would you consider Seattle +2 a huge play? I am rolling with your write-up
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,187
Tokens
All my bets combined are a very large play. +2 is the safest bet with smallest payout.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,686
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com