Feedback fuels the fire to share info with you guys
Let me know what you guys are thinking here ?
Let me know what you guys are thinking here ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great infoFeedback fuels the fire to share info with you guys
Let me know what you guys are thinking here ?
- Personal Digging … Fluke Trend or Legit Trend ???????
- YOUR CALL
- Since 2010 / Last 14 Super Bowls
- 28 Teams made the Super Bowl
- 6/28 or 21% Teams that made the SB
- Had a Reg Season Loss of 25 or More Points
- So that's a 79% Chance of NOT Making the SB
- ONLY 2/28 or 7% Teams made the SB
- had a Reg Season Loss of 30 or More Points
- 2012 SB Champ Balt ( Qb Flacco ) Lost by the 30 at Hou
- 2020 SB Champ TB ( Brady ) Lost by 35 at home N.O.
- So that's a 93% Chance of them NOT making the SB
- I have been holding the trend back for quite some time
- but shared with our twitter …but now sharing with you guys
- These were the teams that had Regular Season Losses of 25 or More
- that I eliminated Future Wagers on myself
- besides one team …. Detroit
- Jack lost by 31/ 93% Chance NO SB
- Seattle lost by 34 / 93% Chance NO SB
- Playoff Teams
- Cleve Lost by 25/ 79% Chance NO SB
- Dallas Lost by 32 / 93% Chance NO SB
- Miami Lost by 37 / 93% Chance NO SB
- Still Remaining
- Detroit Lost by 32 / 93% Chance NO SB
- I still put a few $$ on them regardless of the 93%
- chance of them not making the SB
- The Rest of the Playoff Teams
- have a shot at reaching the SB
- For me looking at what's available at Draftkings
- Balt vs SF + 110
- Kc vs Sf + 220
- You can use the Lions to reach the SB ( Your Call )
- Balt vs Det + 450
- Kc vs Det + 700
- I used a similar tactic in Cbb March Madness last year
- $25 Wager on Uconn at 14-1 winning $350
Appreciate the feedbackTickets to watch Super Bowl LVI in-person range from upward of $5,400 to nearly $100,000, according to ticket sale websites. I like Detroit and will their "D" shut down SF....
Ex ....outstanding work bro and thank u for the shareit should be
noted the Ravens gave up the fewest points/game in the league this
year (16.5), and the Chiefs gave up the second-fewest (17.3). When
a conference title game pairs the top two scoring defenses in the
league, the winner has gone on to win the Super Bowl in five of five
instances. Remember that in two weeks.
Just to throw it out there also when a road dog wins the conference championship game I believe they are 10-0 ats last 10 in the SB. I started a thread a few years ago about it.
Not so fast my friend!! I love seeing the “meaningless” trends…there’s usually something to them. Keep it up, thanks for sharing!!...........Not sure really why I bother posting this kind of info ....nobody really cares about my meaningless types of trends .... but .... to each his own ...LOL
Ex ....outstanding work bro and thank u for the share
Exploited17: You should give credit where credit is due. That first trend you cited regarding when the best defenses play each other - was taken directly from Playbook's Mid-Week Alert newsletter. Credit to Marc Lawrence.it should be
noted the Ravens gave up the fewest points/game in the league this
year (16.5), and the Chiefs gave up the second-fewest (17.3). When
a conference title game pairs the top two scoring defenses in the
league, the winner has gone on to win the Super Bowl in five of five
instances. Remember that in two weeks.
Just to throw it out there also when a road dog wins the conference championship game I believe they are 10-0 ats last 10 in the SB. I started a thread a few years ago about it.
Almost all info comes from somewhere else. It isn't new. Even if you never heard of it before chnace are you didn't discover/create the trend/system Who knows who originally noticed it. And if you think Lawrence is the first person to know or tell people that he probably isn't. All I did was share info which btw way has been around for quite some time because I have heard it years before.Exploited17: You should give credit where credit is due. That first trend you cited regarding when the best defenses play each other - was taken directly from Playbook's Mid-Week Alert newsletter. Credit to Marc Lawrence.
Kaboom - keep up the great trends you have been posting. That's two pretty potent negatives on the Detroit Lions and I'm certainly paying attention to them.
Gander ... appreciate the kudos bro ....we never know ...but Detroit can surprise .... just things I've noticed broExploited17: You should give credit where credit is due. That first trend you cited regarding when the best defenses play each other - was taken directly from Playbook's Mid-Week Alert newsletter. Credit to Marc Lawrence.
Kaboom - keep up the great trends you have been posting. That's two pretty potent negatives on the Detroit Lions and I'm certainly paying attention to them.