Not to get into a pissing match but anyone would be hard pressed to find a +3 at -120 let alone +3.5 at -120. At least so far.
They charge way to much getting to and/or across 3.
Agree on the better strength of schedule aspect though. Denver doesn't seem as battle tested. People also totally over reacting to them easily handling NE last week who was a shell of their former selves going into the game. Then when Talib went out they had zero chance.
They charge way to much getting to and/or across 3.
Agree on the better strength of schedule aspect though. Denver doesn't seem as battle tested. People also totally over reacting to them easily handling NE last week who was a shell of their former selves going into the game. Then when Talib went out they had zero chance.
At sportsbook.com the game is 2.5 even money, meaning you can buy the half point to 3 for just -125, but at Bookmaker, it costs -140. When I buy half points, which is not very often, I buy not to lose, instead of to win. I would be happy to push instead of lose. FWIW, my Bad Looking Plays thread, tells why I like Seattle in some detail. Good Luck.
My book has Seattle +3 -145 but that is with buying pts
great season
