HITMAN | NFL Side - Sunday, Sep 20 2020 1:00PM
261 LOS 8.0(-120) BetOnline vs 262 PHI double-dime bet
Analysis: MNF 9/14 PROPS (these were posted two hours ago in forums and twitter)
James Conner (PIT) O62.5 Rush Yds -110 (Fanduel)
Eric Ebron (PIT) O25.5 Rec Yds -110 (DK)
THURSDAY/SUNDAY NFL PROPS WILL BE POSTED IN THIS PICK
Allen Robinson (CHI) O67.5 Rec Yds -115 (PB)
Ezekiel Elliot (DAL) O28.5 Rec Yds -115 (PB)
TY Hilton (IND) O65.5 Rec Yds -115 (PB)
Raheem Mostert (SF) U63.5 Rush Yds -110 (FD)
Hayden Hurst (ATL) O38.5 Rec Yds -115 (PB)
Mark Andrews (BAL) O54.5 rec yds -110 (FD)
2* 6 PT TEASER
RAMS +8/KC -2
UptownDave
Twins +130 20*
also sent out Kc 2nd half -9 and over 24
UptownDaveSports
GOY
Carolina +9 *10
Eagles under 46 *5
Lions +6 *2
Jags +7.5 *2
Falcons +4 *2
jets over 41 *1
vikes over 49 *1
ravens under 50 *1
*** also 1/2 unit on underdog ML's always***
Teaser of day 10pt 3team *5
Panthers +18.5
Falcons +13
Rams under 56
MLB
Reds -120 *5
Reds under 9.5 *5
Padres over 8.5 *5
It's a 2 team 6 pt teaser. LA spread was +2 (add 6 and you get 8). KC was -8, so that's down to a -2.
"2* 6 PT TEASER
RAMS +8/KC -2"
I appreciate your efforts. I understand teasers ok. The teaser is clearly stated at the bottom, and it's fine. The thing I did not/do not get is "LOS 8.0 (-120", a statement presented several lines above the teaser. No other team mentioned. It is presented as a straight side bet on the Rams with an incorrect line of +7.5 bought up to +8 for -120.
Thank you again for your time.
I have never heard of UptownDaveSports but I do know these picks aren't his.
I have been a long time subscriber of the site he got these from.
Everything is exact including the the 1/2 unit on underdog MLs, which is the service's signature style of play.
There's no way it's a coincidence!
10* is game of the year
How did he get a name for 20 *?
Is it game of the century? face)(*^%
I contacted the service whose picks uptowndavesports posted.
They told me that UPTOWNDAVESPORTS and DLARS are the same person and that his account was suspended for "unauthorized distribution".
Due to privacy policies they wouldn't say anything more.
Just a heads up.