Stanford -2 1/2 vs Colorado???

Search

New member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
1,241
Tokens
I did like this Stanford team early on and it seems like years ago...... with all of their injuries this is a team that.....
Is a running team and cannot run block.... have QBs that cannot complete passes..... have a secondary that cannot cover anybody....
Now they are favored over a Colorado team that has played pretty well thru this season.
Hard to imagine CU not winning this game. Is Stanford getting too much credit for a come from behind road win against a horrid Notre Dame team?
Wazzu just demonstrated that going to Palo Alto and picking up an easy win isn't difficult and I think Colorado is better then Wazzu.
WTF is up with this line? Conan or anybody else feel free to weigh in on this....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
7,485
Tokens
It is a line that is begging you to take Colorado which is always something to be wiery of. I agree Colorado has been the better team but this line does smell.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
7,158
Tokens
Line should go higher imo when\if its announced McCaffery is a go. Trees don't seem to have much firepower w/o him and their home field is not that intimidating, could be a large Buffs contingency on hand with lots of alumni in Bay Area.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2016
Messages
1,026
Tokens
Line should go higher imo when\if its announced McCaffery is a go. Trees don't seem to have much firepower w/o him and their home field is not that intimidating, could be a large Buffs contingency on hand with lots of alumni in Bay Area.

Appears to me that the line is already priced in with him playing.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
7,158
Tokens
I thought the opener at -3.5 was a pretty good #, I actually have it a little higher than that but a lot depends on the Trees health imo. Shaw has been good at home in conference 21-5 SU, although this team does not appear to be at quite the same caliber as the past 5 Stanford squads.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
2,708
Tokens
I did like this Stanford team early on and it seems like years ago...... with all of their injuries this is a team that.....
Is a running team and cannot run block.... have QBs that cannot complete passes..... have a secondary that cannot cover anybody....
Now they are favored over a Colorado team that has played pretty well thru this season.
Hard to imagine CU not winning this game. Is Stanford getting too much credit for a come from behind road win against a horrid Notre Dame team?
Wazzu just demonstrated that going to Palo Alto and picking up an easy win isn't difficult and I think Colorado is better then Wazzu.
WTF is up with this line? Conan or anybody else feel free to weigh in on this....

they have a coach who doesn't understand football .
 

New member
Joined
Oct 2, 2016
Messages
6
Tokens
Stan win over ND was just because of Irish meltdown at QB OL still cannot block anybody.

Conan liked Stan against Wash. However, I think your take is spot on. Game strongly favors the Buffs
 

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2016
Messages
1,026
Tokens
they have a coach who doesn't understand football .

Who?.. ND or Stanford, or both? Certainly Kelly has worn out his welcome and I think David Shaw is overrated, but not sure who you are referring to.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
Stan win over ND was just because of Irish meltdown at QB OL still cannot block anybody.
Conan liked Stan against Wash. However, I think your take is spot on. Game strongly favors the Buffs

The beard is back.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,986
Messages
13,575,792
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com