jaydoggie said:
decided to play pitt huh?
have you researched any deeper in this system? i was thinking about going team by team last year and trying to discover an end result. although it would be difficult without knowing the exact lines. unless you have already done this?
I did this, there are threads that go into the results from last year, in short
teams .500 or better were +220 units
teams under .500 were -216 units
However, of those teams under .500, the teams under .450 were -210
That is where the change I made came in; i.e., fading the worst teams. If you removed the 7 worst teams last year, you were up about 214 units on the year. I have a spreadsheet if you want it.