sportspay (a sytem im working on) ytd rec 21-19

[sportspay]

I'm running a system that consists of two parts the first part locates the best probale winning team my goal is to get the most in a narrow list that is the list i will post first

with this i can cap more thuroghly and input on any of these teams is greatly apreciated.

i only posted the first part yesturday as through my own falts i ran out of time in narrowing it down to 1-4 teams max
IT went 6-6 not what the goal is as im looking fora high percentage in the first part

these are todays 1st part systems i will have to narrow it down THEY ARE NOT PLAYS

st joseph______ -1.5
denver_____________+1
youngs t st_______________+6
louisville_________ -3
utah st_________________-6
uc irvine__________________ +7
santa clara____________________ -9
st mary__________________________ +4.5
citadel_____________ -3.5
e.illinois_________________ +9
samford______________________ -9
montana st_______________________ +6
as im ruuning out of time help is appreciated
<!-- / message -->

 

[sportspay]

i know the lines may have changed in some games by now the final list will have the upto date lines

 

[woodypaige]

If these aren't your plays, then why post them, like they were. It can confuse people as to your REAL plays.
hno:

Also most of these were opening lines from last night and aren't doing anyone any good, unless you post the lines that Are available when you do post your plays. (That's a rule that Wil has posted, not myself)



Your title is good. Thanks for being honest.

 

[awmllc2000]

Seriously man. Its not that hard. Post your picks at a widely available line as you place them.<><>

 

[sportspay]

If these aren't your plays, then why post them, like they were. It can confuse people as to your REAL plays.
hno:

Also most of these were opening lines from last night and aren't doing anyone any good, unless you post the lines that Are available when you do post your plays. (That's a rule that Wil has posted, not myself)



Your title is good. Thanks for being honest.

dude you may know how to write but i guess you can't read...or just dont get what ive been trying to do.

Ibussy right now so if you have a comment that may be usefull pertaining to one of those teams lets hear it or else bye cause im already behind no thanks to you

 

[sportspay]

sorry the above was posted in the wrong place..

just ignore it

 

[sportspay]

sorry it is in the right place... and those lines where from last night (reeferman)so you to unless you have something usefull get lost

 

[awmllc2000]

Whats our plays tonight sportsguy?!~~~!

 

[roadreeler57]

Seriously man. Its not that hard. Post your picks at a widely available line as you place them.<><>

If they are really strong picks line doesnt mean much anyway although it did with me & BG last nite..Whew

 

[sportspay]

Whats our plays tonight sportsguy?!~~~!

your more annoying than your picture

 

[awmllc2000]

If they are really strong picks line doesnt mean much anyway although it did with me & BG last nite..Whew

Just trying to keep the guy honest. Unfortunatly its hard for some to do on thier own.!~~~!

 

[awmllc2000]

your more annoying than your picture

you are extremely clever<<

 

[sportspay]

4 official plays

st mary's ******** +5

louisville********* +4

denver*************** +1

montana st *****************+5.5


those are the plays and lines (i will shop more around and see if i can find a half point somewhere)

these will be the graded lines regardles

 

[tlee4lizard]

Just curious myself not sure what you listed the games for?
Are these games you are looking at that you might play and you got the lines last night?
Are you asking people for info on these games? Their opinion?
And will you be posting the lines from last night if they are a play? Or the updated line if it has changed?
Not being smart just curious, iw ill cap these games and tell you if i like any.

 

[awmllc2000]

4 official plays

st mary's ******** +5

louisville********* +4

denver*************** +1

montana st *****************+5.5


those are the plays and lines (i will shop more around and see if i can find a half point somewhere)

these will be the graded lines regardles

Louisville +4:nohead: I wish I could get within a 10 foot pole of that line.

 

[tlee4lizard]

St.joes
pepperdine
gonzaga

only agreed with st.joes
santa clara doesnt score alot of points not an easy cover at 9- and they only won by 12 @ home and they turned the ball over 16 times @home. Not the team i would want on the road.PEPPERDINE 10-1 @ HOME AGAINST SANTA CLARA
Gonzaga will dominate st.marys without mills

my opinion only good luck

 

[sportspay]

SORRY referman that would be -4

now you are just being a dick----just like ucf-9 last night

 

[redatmosphere]

4 official plays

st mary's ******** +5

louisville********* +4

denver*************** +1

montana st *****************+5.5


those are the plays and lines (i will shop more around and see if i can find a half point somewhere)

these will be the graded lines regardles

This makes me sick...#%()#%()

First. You're clearly meant to say louisville -4 correct?

Second. If you "shop around" more, then your play doesn't become the new line you find. Instead, if you add a second bet on the same team at a different line, you have two different bets. Protocol would be to say next, "found Louisville at -3.5, so I'm playing that as well".

Then, your plays would look like the following:

Louisville -4
Louisville -3.5
St. Mary's +5
Denver +1
Montana St. +5.5

Just trying to help you out and avoid the confusion.

Lastly, quit playing so fucking dumb. You know how this works. Saying shit ex-post like, "Well I couldn't call in my Xavier play in time to my local so it doesn't count for my record" is absolute bullshit and you know it. If you start playing by the rules, people will respect you more.

There are guys on here with records of 25-50 -75units and nobody gives them shit. In fact, it's usually pretty supportive comments with saying things like "turn it around this week" or "I'm on Gonzaga with you, let's get it". If you quit playing the dumbass card and actually keep your record to your posted picks, then everyone will get off your back, myself included.

 

[awmllc2000]

SORRY referman that would be -4

now you are just being a dick----just like ucf-9 last night

Not trying to be a dick....but damn, keeping you honest is a full-time job.^<<^

 

[sportspay]

St.joes
pepperdine
gonzaga

only agreed with st.joes
santa clara doesnt score alot of points not an easy cover at 9- and they only won by 12 @ home and they turned the ball over 16 times @home. Not the team i would want on the road.PEPPERDINE 10-1 @ HOME AGAINST SANTA CLARA
Gonzaga will dominate st.marys without mills

my opinion only good luck

the first list is alist that after i compute sertain numbers matched with the line have the best chances to win. those will not all be my plays. I then have to reaserch and cap them manually. its just a list to focus on a few games only. The goal is to have a list thats not large 12 games max but with a high probability of winning against the spread. the higher this list the better the chance of picking 1-4 winning games To play officially

i'm sorry if i dont explain myself well. im probably gonna have to write it out first and then post the theory behind this