SPORTSBOOK MERGERS.....good or bad?

Search

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
There always seems to be continual rumors in the offshore industry regarding the possibilities of certain sportsbook mergers.

Your feelings on this subject.

Thank you in advance.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
i think mergers are great. i always deem them as good good news.

it makes a book stronger and it shows power.

it also removes weaker and suspect books, it increases their volume and customer base so now they have more capital to play with and they can offer the players more things like early lines props bonuses and reduced juice.

also when THE SHRINK posts about them, he usually seems upbeat about it so that also leads me to believe they are good.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
My biggest fear with mergers is we may see less and less offers of reduced vig, betting options, promotional offers, etc.,etc.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
Anytime a company merges and gets bigger it will reduce the benefits that have been given out as a small operation. Seems like growth in any industry leads to negative as bigger companies cannot and do not have the means to have a hands-on approach as is most often seen in the small operations. In today's lean way of thinking, the goal is to reduce overhead and in essence that reduces the fringes for employees and players IMO. Is it a good thing overall? I think so because it likely will financially strengthen the company. Growth is good and growth is bad. Kind of depends where you are sitting.
 

Hawkeye-Packer-Yankee
Joined
Jan 20, 2000
Messages
3,514
Tokens
jjgold said:
Big shops take smallest minimums

gambling 101

Then you belong at the BIGGEST.

Try BlowHardBets.com
 

It's like sum fucking Beckett play that we're rehe
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
2,917
Tokens
While the financial backing is a plus for players, the uniqueness of the shop is a negative.

2 cases in point:

VIP acquires Bet on Games and reduces the bonus ( 20% cash to 15% cash a 25% reduction invalue) on reloads and eliminates the 5c wednesday baskets promo.

CRIS acquires ASAP and lines become less opinionated and bonus changes to a match play (10% cash becomes 10% match play, a 35% decline in value)

I'm sure others have similar examples.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
assassin said:
While the financial backing is a plus for players, the uniqueness of the shop is a negative.

2 cases in point:

VIP acquires Bet on Games and reduces the bonus ( 20% cash to 15% cash a 25% reduction invalue) on reloads and eliminates the 5c wednesday baskets promo.

CRIS acquires ASAP and lines become less opinionated and bonus changes to a match play (10% cash becomes 10% match play, a 35% decline in value)

I'm sure others have similar examples.
Excellent statement
 

New member
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Messages
324
Tokens
I think that cutting down on the competition in any industry ends up being bad for the consumer. Gives the merged company more power over there customers. That translates into less value for us
 

Hawkeye-Packer-Yankee
Joined
Jan 20, 2000
Messages
3,514
Tokens
This is still an expanding market. That being the case there will be more parties interested in entering the market. Barriers to entry are more legal than financial. I expect to see more Government sponsored entities coming into the gaming industry sooner rather than later. Simply stated it is a big revenue opportunity and it is a "sin tax" that all Governments love to latch on to. The good old USA will be in the business within 5 years.


IMHO
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,519
Messages
13,569,306
Members
100,818
Latest member
c54credit1
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com