Shouldn't rule be based on bettors intent?

[zeeman]

When we make a moneyline bet isn't are intent to win a bet based on the official final score of the event. You would think Las Vegas baseball rules would follow this common sense. How long will it take the morons that run Las Vegas sportbooks to change the current rules. The rules should be geared towards the intent of the player. Remember the customor is always right. Players intent isn't to have a bet graded before the game is completed.

 

[Illini]

I think everyone sees the need for the rules to be changed, at least for the postseason. But it's too late to change the rules for last night.

The customer isn't always right. The customer is usually wrong.

 

[HAT]

How many fawking threads are you going to make on this? Anyone who doesn't understand the rule or think's they are getting screwed....shouldn't be betting baseball.

Do you not understand that the only reason The Rays tied the game is because they had an unequal amount of at bats?

 

[barman]

As a bettor, my intent is to get paid on every wager I place

So far, no good

 

[zeeman]

As a bettor, my intent is to get paid on every wager I place

So far, no good

So you don't care about fairness, you just want to get paid. Give me some of that stuff your smoking.

 

[zeeman]

How many fawking threads are you going to make on this? Anyone who doesn't understand the rule or think's they are getting screwed....shouldn't be betting baseball.

Do you not understand that the only reason The Rays tied the game is because they had an unequal amount of at bats?

You just don't understand. The only reason Philly scored is because the ump was squeezing the plate on Kazmir. Even the annoucers said so. Hey but thats part of the game isn't it. But you know what 9 innings or more is also part of this game and Philly will be getting their at bats when the game resumes. Do you understand now - To be continued!!!