Should the RX start a B.C.S (Board Comparision of Sportsbooks)?

lander · Oct 22, 2003

I think we could have a vote where every selects 5 posters that they feel would give an accurrate assessment of books. The top 10 elected posters would then form the board. They would each vote on their top 25 EVERY week with a simple voting such as

(for example)
1. Pinnalce (25 points)
2. Grande (24 points)
3. CRIS (23 points)
.
.
.
25. Canbet (1 point)

Then the points are totaled up and the books with the most cumulative points gets 1st, 2nd gets 2nd and so on ....

I think this would be a fair way of assessing the books. Perhaps the assessing components would be (recent history, bankroll, speed of payments, software, CS, longevity, etc ...).

Does anyone else think this would be a good way of getting a less biased assessment of the Offshore World?

Dante · Oct 22, 2003

GREAT idea!!! Lander I think this would work...it might need its own thread/forum though

lander · Oct 22, 2003

Well, just in case my 5 votes go to

1. Jazz
2. Wilhiem
3. GamblingIsLife
4. TTinco
5. Daryl Parsons

sfeiner · Oct 22, 2003

what would be better than a list of all sportsbooks with a link to most all topics and threads related to that book that have been posted here on americas most active website?

answer = nothing

we had it, they deleted it, why would they let this stand instead?

and another thing right quick, i'm about sick of these goofballs coming in here whining " i lost my money at www. depositonlysportsbookthateveryoneandtheirmotherknowsisa****inscambutidepositedanywaycusimso****insmart.com they can't do a little reasearch before they send somebody their money then they get everything they deserve. don't come whining in here you BML/ESB dumbasses.

we now return to our regularly scheduled programming..

Chadster · Oct 22, 2003

what stu said

lander · Oct 22, 2003

sfeiner,
there are hundreds of retarded deadbeat sportsbooks, so I thought the top 25 would be a cliff notes version. Not all of us are Offshore Experts like me and you, the newbies would have a great use for this (IMO).

And to be honest, I got the idea from CW (I think that's his name) , the B2G guy, but the problem with his stuff is that it's by vote, and a recent trouble isnt' accurately represented. Say a book suddendly starts stiffing, but was great for months prior. The accumulative voting idea would not indicate at all that there are problems as most votes would have been given during the past times when the book was perceived to be solid.

This would be a weekly update

I'm not trying to offend you by helping people, must like the free live lines did