Should Forums Have A Policy On Members Who Start Posting Picks & Add A Winning Record That's Undocumented

[HacheMan]

Whether they are new members or existing members, and they have never posted their plays, but begin to do so and include a winning record that they allegedly built BEFORE they started posting picks.

Should it be allowed & ignored, or should the posters be asked to only post their records that currently exists since they began posting their plays on the forum?

 

[ZJP6050]

shouldn't be allowed...much deceit filled in those sort of records

 

[GREENHEAD]

As a mod,you should know the answer.

Only records from here(the rx) are allowed.
I'll take your pay for the day.

 

[HacheMan]

As a mod,you should know the answer.

Only records from here(the rx) are allowed.
I'll take your pay for the day.

I know we all have our opinoins, and despite that, it's not a policy at any sports forum I know of.

Just thought it was good sportsbetting convo......:toast:

 

[GREENHEAD]

Section 3-25 of your Mod-Manual specifically talks
about this.Go back and read it.

 

[trytrytry]

ignore it..use the pics as "information" as best you can.

 

[ProPokerPlayer]

Exactly.....let em put up a 24-1 record if they want. Miss 2 in a row and those guys in the pick forum will tie and quarter the poor bastard...

 

[TomGshotput]

exactly who is being decieved by it?

 

[ZJP6050]

exactly who is being decieved by it?

new people? stupid people? you tell me

 

[WorldNumberOne]

i think it falls under the " who really gives a shit clause "

 

[Coldweather]

I think ya just put it in it's proper prospective. This is what I think about this here issue.

:cripwalk::cripwalk::cripwalk::toast:

 

[PokerBookie]

I don't know if there should be a policy on this, it seems that it would give the mods a lot more work to do, by trying to make sure that every members posted record is 100% correct and verified. For the most part the members that follow other members plays kind of police those records so to speak. When past records sound to good to be true and they are undocumented, it usually means that the record is to good to be true.

It would be easy for some new members that like to follow or fade, if only plays that have been posted at The RX can count toward a record.

But all it really takes is a little common sense and research by the member looking to follow or fade to know if its a good idea to tail or not.