In the Raiders/Shack contest the rules state that plays have to be in 30 minutes prior to the start of the game. Shack posts a play 28 min before the listed start of the game. The play loses and two days later he says it's not a play. He was trying to take a free shot at a win. If it wins he takes it then if it loses he cries no play. If a play is put it late then all loses should count imo. If it wins then it's a no play so you can't try and pull a fast one. The other thing is the first pitch was 30 minutes after the start of the game so in all circumstances this is a loss. Any opinions?
guys i have seen the problem with the over cinn and the yanke game
i like both you guys and really dont want to get into a position where i lose either for a on line buddy
i have to go out till around 4 eastern
try to work this out and if you cant let me know and i will <judge> if thats what you both agree
i like both you guys and really dont want to get into a position where i lose either for a on line buddy
i have to go out till around 4 eastern
try to work this out and if you cant let me know and i will <judge> if thats what you both agree
Vegas
Shut the fvck up you needle dick little twat. Your dumbass little buddy
is bending the rules to benefit himself. He does all the crying. If you go and read everything you to will see. Now quit trying to pass yourself off as objective on anything that involves Raiders. Clearly you have your nose planted firmly up his ass.
Shut the fvck up you needle dick little twat. Your dumbass little buddy
Dogball. Raiders kisses your ass in every thread you post. Why wouldn't we expect these comments from you. So obviously you would say that Shacks play yesterday was voided and Raiders from last week would be voided since no one agreed on the lines to use. You can't have your cake and eat it too Raiders. Nice try, now Dogballs integrity is in question.
MFG-
My comments extended to the 2 minute thing only. I have no idea of the facts from last weeks dispute. You can supply them for me and I will rule objectively.
Raiders tells it like it is, I am the last person whose ass he would kiss , trust me. I respect and like raiders, but it is all earned both ways. I take strong exception to your allegations and suggest you rethink them.
My comments extended to the 2 minute thing only. I have no idea of the facts from last weeks dispute. You can supply them for me and I will rule objectively.
Raiders tells it like it is, I am the last person whose ass he would kiss , trust me. I respect and like raiders, but it is all earned both ways. I take strong exception to your allegations and suggest you rethink them.
Dogball - I respect you as much as anyone here, but the issue was not one bet, but three. Shack agreed with the two minute deal. It was Raiders that first made the issue about it, and Shack turned the tables. Basically Shack told him that if two minutes counts here then two minutes counts there. Raiders was wanting two minutes to be no big deal when it favored him, and a big deal when it favored Shack. SeaUrchin made the ruling that half the units would be thrown out. That's all. I'm cool with you.
MFG and Shack are the one that started to cry about everything. I made a bet at -105 and they cried it was -109. I even posted a ticket showing -105. After that I started checking times of Shacks post. Shack posted an over of 10.5. When he posted the line was 11. The worst of all is shack wanted to cancel a bet 2 days after the game because he posted it 30 minutes prior to the first pitch. How can this be canceled?
