Interesting post. Good work tracking this, I assume it is correct. Did you factor they charge $25 or more per win? 111 wins @ $25= -$2775 that would cut down that profit a little bit.
Keep up the good work guys! Go Angels hope they come back again, toronto hurt me as well. Bad day/night, guess we always have tomorrow. :nopityA:
Last week 34 winners cost $850 or more ($850 if all $25)
Hey, Lionman !
Glad to hear from you again, long time no hear. Yeh, fucked up taking your Pens in the finale, but the price was right & I had already had the winner in the only loss. How does the #2 team in the league be a +120 @ home, that's rediculous. Had Halos as my top bet w/ Tor. 2nd, & Det. 3rd w/ a parlay Cinci & SF; that may be only winner. Got a couple invites from major cappers to be their "hockey capper" next season based on my 17-3-2 run this yr. plus a mag. wanting to have me write a hockey column every week. I owe it all to you guys you said fuck Lem Banker, Ben Burns, & prophet "we're waiting on RDS picks". Thanks guys for the support, I'll never let you down! Getting all the hockey mags & will be ready next yr. to crush the books in pucks. Even if I go tout will take care of my boys, you made me what I am. Thx. RDS
Glad to hear from you again, long time no hear. Yeh, fucked up taking your Pens in the finale, but the price was right & I had already had the winner in the only loss. How does the #2 team in the league be a +120 @ home, that's rediculous. Had Halos as my top bet w/ Tor. 2nd, & Det. 3rd w/ a parlay Cinci & SF; that may be only winner. Got a couple invites from major cappers to be their "hockey capper" next season based on my 17-3-2 run this yr. plus a mag. wanting to have me write a hockey column every week. I owe it all to you guys you said fuck Lem Banker, Ben Burns, & prophet "we're waiting on RDS picks". Thanks guys for the support, I'll never let you down! Getting all the hockey mags & will be ready next yr. to crush the books in pucks. Even if I go tout will take care of my boys, you made me what I am. Thx. RDS
RDS, always like seeing your posts. It's really great to see a true hockey fan still around. Quite honestly, down here in Texas where I live, you'd think hockey was a done sport, especially after the strike. It's sad to see and I hope it comes back, but I just don't see many fans anymore. I think if it ever comes back to a premium cable channel, that might help. Anyways, I'm the way you are with your magazines, but mine are college football. Now's the time when I start reading all the pre-season crap (most of it couldn't be further off base), but it gets me through the long hot summer down here. Anyways, thanks for all your winners. BOL.Glad to hear from you again, long time no hear. Yeh, fucked up taking your Pens in the finale, but the price was right & I had already had the winner in the only loss. How does the #2 team in the league be a +120 @ home, that's rediculous. Had Halos as my top bet w/ Tor. 2nd, & Det. 3rd w/ a parlay Cinci & SF; that may be only winner. Got a couple invites from major cappers to be their "hockey capper" next season based on my 17-3-2 run this yr. plus a mag. wanting to have me write a hockey column every week. I owe it all to you guys you said fuck Lem Banker, Ben Burns, & prophet "we're waiting on RDS picks". Thanks guys for the support, I'll never let you down! Getting all the hockey mags & will be ready next yr. to crush the books in pucks. Even if I go tout will take care of my boys, you made me what I am. Thx. RDS
NO, did not factor in the cost of the plays. There are a bunch of guys contributing it seems. These guys were getting so much hype in this forum that I thought it would be good to track them and see how they did. Otherwise the supporters would brag about how great and the ANYI juice guys would say "YOU will lose, not win". I like to take the emotion out of it and use numbers. We are coming up on a month and as of this morning they are hitting at 61% winners with average juice -132. Converted the win % is 57.4%. 57% is good over the long haul but not if you are paying $500 or more a week for the plays. Unless you are a big money player and I doubt big money players are playing 200+ games a month.
Fading touts still seems like the smarter play
Did you factor in that loses you are not charged $25? I don't know, I like what you do but it just seems like the more you post the more it seems like your just anti YWN or purchased plays. The members buying and posting the YWN games are not kids unlike what the former member of the Rx seems to want to spread in forums. If these guys buying and playing the games weren't happy with the results I don't think you would see those games posted! This is a service play thread, I would like to know where the tout tally would come from if it weren't for people buying plays? My guess would be the tout tally would have to be based on comps and there goes that great idea. Members buy games either to play the games or fade the games and I for one will never question or bash a member that spends their money to give people the chance to play or fade. That said, doesn't mean I don't want to see the monthly YWN percentages, thats a big help.
I guess the point is there would be no tout tally if plays weren't purchased. No diss to you AB, some people like the tally, but people appreciate the plays purchased and posted in the service thread.
Hi gents. I am really not trying to pass judgement either way. I have tailled a few you win plays when I have agreed with them and have went against them when I already had my mind made up. Same with the tout tally. I don't blindly follow anyone or any system as I enjoy capping the games myself. But more than anything I want to win. It would not be smart for me to ignore the info that is out there. I just like to provide people with facts based on results. Too often people give too much credit when someone is hot and damn them to hell when they are cold.
The one thing I have learned in recent years is that if you do not change your ways and are not flexible to different styles of capping you will struggle to profit regularly. I used to be just a numbers guy but learned from a group of guys who rely a lot more on situations and ANTI public plays (the ugly dog theory, etc.) and it has helped me significantly.
Plenty of ways to win and lose at this. Just trying to keep things grounded and in perspective. GL with whatever you decide.
AZ
The one thing I have learned in recent years is that if you do not change your ways and are not flexible to different styles of capping you will struggle to profit regularly. I used to be just a numbers guy but learned from a group of guys who rely a lot more on situations and ANTI public plays (the ugly dog theory, etc.) and it has helped me significantly.
Plenty of ways to win and lose at this. Just trying to keep things grounded and in perspective. GL with whatever you decide.
AZ
