1) Once again... nobody claimed they hit 69% overall... Here is the link to every single pick they've ever released since 2012 (over 17,000 picks), just follow it yourself daily if you want to check (click on each league for individual results):
https://intpicks.com/our-record/
2) I do not work for them nor I represent IntPicks. As I mentioned here before, I was a paying client for many years, now they give me free access in exchange for spreading the word for them. I can tell you that they have thousands of members from across the world and they're doing just fine without your business. If you don't see their free pick posted here on any given day, that just means that I didn't get around to it and it has nothing to do with their performance whatsoever. For the record, they went 4-2 today and their free pick cashed with Dallas -1.5.
3) More importantly, amongst all the so-called pro services who post no historical records at all, I would think we should be supportive for such a service that is at least striving to be transparent as a community. Please show me another service that post every single pick they release, have at least several years of performance records, hit 54% and I will sign up today regardless of the membership cost. If you have suggestions for them to improve what they do further, just e-mail them at their contact us link. They're very attentive to any input any reply quickly. My experience in this field tells me that anyone who is so obsessed with bad- mouthing another service so insistently typically works for competing services; otherwise, why care this deeply? Just be very careful with any negative reviews without any evidence attached to it, that's all I'm saying.
Having said all that, here is the free pick for Saturday:
IntPicks
Free Pick of the Day for Saturday, January 27, 2024:
COLLEGE BASKETBALL
#770
1 Star
6:30 PM ET
Minnesota @ PSU
Take PSU -2.5
They just released their Saturday & Sunday picks:
Saturday: 2 NBA & 5 CBB picks, 3 top rated
Sunday: Top rated picks for both NFL Conf Championship games + 2 NBA & 2 CBB games, 1 top rated each
9-2 NFL Playoffs run
Here you go:
I stand by EVERY SINGLE THING I have posted about IntPicks and yourself.
This week you alone you have either not shown up and posted anything when you lost the day before and/or tried to hide
your losing record for that day by referring to a longer time frame which makes whatever particular sport you are talking about
look great!!
On winning days, you brag and tell us the specific record about the day before.
And please don't say that on losing days, you didn't have time to post-that is an obvious lie for the simple reason that you were
not to busy to tell us about 7-0 days and 6-1 days.
This week alone you provided indisputable evidence that what I say is correct, namely hiding on losing or 500 days!!
I and most people in this thread were not born yesterday!!
The # 3 section of your post simply begs the question, poisons the well and tries to divert attention away from yourself and your
deception to other services while at the same time repeating your claims of transparency as compared to them when in fact I have shown
this week alone you are anything but transparent in your modus operandi!!
in addition even though this week's pick and for that matter those of the week are a very small sample size, your so-so record hovering
around 50% in itself simply corroborates that neither you or any other service are capable of hitting 69% of bigger plays and 59% of smaller
plays over a 12 year period!!
To be blunt, that is a total lie and not until/if/when you can document that record other than by your own website,
which doesn't mean anything, I will continue to state this using the criterion and proof I have already provided!!
And finally, please don't try to project your own failures and deception onto me by inferring that I work for some other service!!
That has ZERO basis and is a toal fu king lie on your part!!
My employer is myself, and my job protecting possible buyers of your service or any service from purchasing
picks when they verifiably use the modus operandi of a con-artist
Also I don't care about your alleged 69% or 59% and your record-keeping for 12 years.
In order for it to have any meaning, it would have to have been done by a legitimate and respected service which doesn't include
the site itself!
That's it!!