Say what you will about TMZ

[Enfuego]

These fuckers break everything. Have sources all over and they always seem to be accurate.

Levin has built a dynasty.

 

[vitterd]

These fuckers break everything. Have sources all over and they always seem to be accurate.

Levin has built a dynasty.

Its weird.....it's now to the point where I'm waiting on them to confirm if they haven't broken the story themselves.....before I believe it 100 percent.

 

[Enfuego]

Its weird.....it's now to the point where I'm waiting on them to confirm if they haven't broken the story themselves.....before I believe it 100 percent.

Yeah, I check their site regularly. They know their shit and pay good money to get the scoop.

This Prince story is a fine example. They know all the details already.

 

[KingofNicotine]

Their site is really bad. It's the worst that humanity has to offer. Mostly shit on the Kardashians and other shit gossip.

Do they get breaking news? Yes, because they're a popular site so people call them first cause of their name recognition.

 

[CHOPTALK]

The difference in them and the enquirer is they are right almost 100% of the time and the enquirer is right about 97% of the time.

That 3% makes a big difference in the rep of the 2 companies

 

[Enfuego]

Their site is really bad. It's the worst that humanity has to offer. Mostly shit on the Kardashians and other shit gossip.

Do they get breaking news? Yes, because they're a popular site so people call them first cause of their name recognition.

But that's the point King. It may be gossip but it's 100% true.

 

[PatsFan1283]

Gonna go under 97% on the enquirer, don't they usually just make stuff up?

 

[CHOPTALK]

Gonna go under 97% on the enquirer, don't they usually just make stuff up?

Thats a bad rap that they have got for missing on some key stories but if you take them for everything they say they are right way more often then wrong.

They have a lot of stories like the Cruz thing where they talk in code saying things like rumors say this person did this or that without comming out fully on a story but they rarely ever blatantly make stuff up.

They stretch the truth sometimes and put misleading headlines on the cover to make it look like they are saying something they are really not once you start reading the story but they rarely outright lie

 

[CHOPTALK]

If you google something like "how often is the National Enquirer right" you will see that there have been many studies that show they have a rep that is worse then it should.

 

[KingofNicotine]

Let's see if they're right about Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie divorcing and she's dying.

 

[pocketrockets]

To think Brad switched Gorgeous Aniston for this anorexic superficial chick

 

[RenoChazz]

The enquirer is closer to 50/50. Jennifer Aniston has been expecting twins for how long now?

 

[beefdiesel]

To think Brad switched Gorgeous Aniston for this anorexic superficial chick

She probably rocked in bed, other than that I don't see why

 

[bounceback]

is she really "dying" tho lol

 

[3peet]

I wouldnt care if that place was blown up

 

[flashmo]

The difference in them and the enquirer is they are right almost 100% of the time and the enquirer is right about 97% of the time.

That 3% makes a big difference in the rep of the 2 companies

They don't print it unless it's true

 

[slapshot]

TMZ is a joke nothing really to see there