Saturday Bet O The Day 5/2

[OccamsRazor]

PLAYOFFS 2008/2009
YTD 8-6 (61.5%)
SIDES 1-5 (16.6%)
TOTALS 7-1 (87.5%)

Won with the UNDER MIA/ATL on Friday.

Like how I put that .6 on my Sides percentage? Thats to let you guys know that its close to 17%!.hno: I have no regrets on my Sides picks. The number has bitten me on numerous occasions and I've had close losses on the others.

Moving on. What can you say about the Boston/Chicago Side? Great series, close games. The Home Favorite has sucked and tomorrow is the 7th game. Wow which way to go? The obvious, form holds yet again in this series.

OVER 196 (<)<

 

[kingking]

Thank you kindly my good man. Much appreciated. (<)<

 

[kingking]

PLAYOFFS 2008/2009
YTD 8-6 (61.5%)
SIDES 1-5 (16.6%)
TOTALS 7-1 (87.5%)

Won with the UNDER MIA/ATL on Friday.

Like how I put that .6 on my Sides percentage? Thats to let you guys know that its close to 17%!.hno: I have no regrets on my Sides picks. The number has bitten me on numerous occasions and I've had close losses on the others.

Moving on. What can you say about the Boston/Chicago Side? Great series, close games. The Home Favorite has sucked and tomorrow is the 7th game. Wow which way to go? The obvious, form holds yet again in this series.

OVER 196 (<)<

based on this am i right to assume if you were to pick a side it would be chi+6?

just wondering so i can fade it, bringing the total record for the 2 picks: 12-2 :toast: whatever works to break the books right? lovin the OVER! thanks again.

 

[OccamsRazor]

based on this am i right to assume if you were to pick a side it would be chi+6?

just wondering so i can fade it, bringing the total record for the 2 picks: 12-2 :toast: whatever works to break the books right? lovin the OVER! thanks again.

I would not pick a side, the Total is enough for me. But you are right the value lies with the Dog and the points

 

[diop]

all but 1 game has gone over in this series.. try my luck with you and go the over again.. hoping the game 7 scenario doesn't make these guys tentative and shoot like shit..

 

[OccamsRazor]

Scores in Boston without OT:

118-115= 233

97-97= 194

93-93= 186

204 average.

Bulls offensively inclined. Same with Boston without Garnett

Boston's defense without Garnett is a shell of their dominant selves from last year. The defensive rotation has been atrocious. Garnett's suit has been responsible for the OVERS, more than anything else.

 

[HacheMan]

Good Luck Raz

 

[OccamsRazor]

From the papers

The Bulls have proved themselves unfazed by Boston's rabid fans. And, more quietly, they are supremely confident they can run on a thin and tiring Celtics team as long as they get defensive stops.

Tellingly, the Bulls piled up an 18-3 edge in fastbreak points in Game 6 and lead 99-68 in that statistic in the series.

The Bulls are 3-5 all-time in Game 7s and 0-5 on the road, with their most recent Game 7 an 88-83 home victory over Indiana in the 1998 Eastern Conference finals. The Celtics are 16-3 in Game 7s at home.

But that's ancient history. The Bulls are more mindful that after going 2-7 in overtime during the regular season, they are 3-1 in extra play during this series.

Looks like its going to be A Running Of The Bulls versus The League Leading 3point Shooters.

 

[diop]

hmm i like those qoutes from the papers.. looks like bulls are tryna shoot the celtics out early!

cmon over

 

[diop]

grrr line down 2 points to
194.5

either bookies thing the under is the play or its being pounded like all hell

either way aint lookn good :s

 

[Sea-Urchin]

I think the line's been pounded like ho in your avatar.... :devilex: GL mate.

 

[OccamsRazor]

grrr line down 2 points to
194.5

either bookies think the under is the play or its being pounded like all hell

either way aint lookn good :s

Its actually a good thing that the line is going down. It means the majority of the money is coming in on the UNDER late. Remember that the majority is mostly wrong. Track money movement, line changes, steam etc. You will find that hammered or steamed lines lose more often than 52.4%.

The Line moves on opinion. The opinion late might be due to it being the 7th game and "the 7th game will be played cautiously." or it might be Sharp money since supposedly Sharps always bet UNDERS.

But it doesn't matter, the opinion of gamblers has no bearing on the objective facts before you. These 2 teams will play OVER 6 out of 10 times and we want to be on the right side. (OVER)Will it go OVER tonight? I hope so, If it doesn't, we always have tomorrows games. Our goal is long term.

 

[crazyivan]

Nice call dude!

 

[Huego]

nice

 

[OccamsRazor]

Congrats:
:toast:
KingK, Hach, Diop, SeaUrges and Cwazy(Like a Fox)Ivan.

Thanks for the Luck and feedback fellows (<)<
:toast:

 

[OccamsRazor]

I wanted to make a correction on my record coming in to tonight. I figured a wrong percentage for the Sides it should be 57.1% instead of 61.5%


Wrong:

PLAYOFFS 2008/2009
YTD 8-6 (61.5%)
SIDES 1-5 (16.6%)
TOTALS 7-1 (87.5%)

Right:

PLAYOFFS 2008/2009
YTD 8-6 (57.1%)
SIDES 1-5 (16.6%)
TOTALS 7-1 (87.5%)

 

[kingking]

Congrats:
:toast:
KingK, Hach, Diop, SeaUrges and Cwazy(Like a Fox)Ivan.

Thanks for the Luck and feedback fellows (<)<
:toast:

Thank you my brother, thank you. The peoples capper ladies and gents. Congrats on the win and thanks a million for sharing. :toast<)<