Ron Paul vs Stephen Baldwin on Marijuana Prohibtion

[nimue77 0]

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ufekh_SwZd0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ufekh_SwZd0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


The irony is I don't think Ron has ever used an illicit drug and Baldwin has more than likely done them all.

 

[TKE683 0]

Too bad Paul is not our president.

 

[docmercer 0]

Is Baldwin really the best that the prohibition side could bring to the debate against Ron Paul?

When the representative for your side starts off the debate with the caveat that he's been a part of 2 "very popular" marijuana movies (and sounds proud saying it), you might as well have dressed him in a Washington Generals uniform.

How bad were the others that auditioned to sub in for King that this gal from The View was left standing?

 

[RobFunk 0]

That clip is a good example of where conservative values and actual real conservatism clash.

Why would any real conservative advocate a war on pot when it costs them money?

And that hand talking thing Baldwin did at the end was very immature.

 

[nimue77 0]

The War on Drugs is just as much a Democratic Party value as it is a Republican Party value.

That clip is a good example of where conservative values and actual real conservatism clash.

Why would any real conservative advocate a war on pot when it costs them money?

And that hand talking thing Baldwin did at the end was very immature.

 

[WharfRat+ 0]

too bad paul is not our president.

+1