Righty conservative says Repubs doomed in the Senate and in the White House in 2016

[JDeuce]

Yeah, I realize that, I also realize that "rarely" doesn't mean "never," and, even if it HAD been never, there was NEVER at MLB team that had won 4 straight playoff games that happened to go into extra innings-until they did. And we all remember how spot on your predictions were in the LAST presidential election, so, you'll pardon me if I take your opinion with a very large grain of salt. You and your scumbag party are butt fucked, DEAL with J-Doosh...

Yep, because comparing a baseball playoff series to a presidential election is very much apples to apples.

You are right about one thing, though...there is a first time for everything (except apparently your ability to come up with a rational thought of your own).

Presidential elections have countless factors which ultimately decide the outcome. And this might be another one:


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...seeking_nomination_in_2016.html#ixzz3JWsXr8et


Andrew Stiles of the Free Beacon points out that Hillary Clinton, who if elected would be the oldest-ever person inaugurated, could well be the youngest person declaring for the nomination in 2016:

Grandmother Hillary Clinton, 67, is vying to become one of the oldest world leaders in history. In order to achieve that goal, however, she may have to defeat a slate of Democratic challengers who are even older than she is.
That sounds hard to believe, but it’s true. In addition to Clinton, the 2016 Democratic field could include: California governor Jerry Brown, Vice President Joe Biden (the presumed frontrunner), and Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders.
​

Quite the geriatric lineup dimocaps seem to being fielding. You think that's going to excite the young progressive base and improve the turnout? Especially with Republicans likely looking to youngsters like Scott Walker, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley...to name a few. Remind me which party caters to old white men again?

But yeah, I'll tell ya...it's a real long shot to imagine an R taking the White House in 2016. Almost as absurd as states like Illinois, Massachusetts or Maryland electing Republican governors! Oh, wait...

 

[Dafinch]

Yep, because comparing a baseball playoff series to a presidential election is very much apples to apples.

You are right about one thing, though...there is a first time for everything (except apparently your ability to come up with a rational thought of your own).

Presidential elections have countless factors which ultimately decide the outcome. And this might be another one:


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...seeking_nomination_in_2016.html#ixzz3JWsXr8et


Andrew Stiles of the Free Beacon points out that Hillary Clinton, who if elected would be the oldest-ever person inaugurated, could well be the youngest person declaring for the nomination in 2016:

Grandmother Hillary Clinton, 67, is vying to become one of the oldest world leaders in history. In order to achieve that goal, however, she may have to defeat a slate of Democratic challengers who are even older than she is.
That sounds hard to believe, but it’s true. In addition to Clinton, the 2016 Democratic field could include: California governor Jerry Brown, Vice President Joe Biden (the presumed frontrunner), and Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders.
​

Quite the geriatric lineup dimocaps seem to being fielding. You think that's going to excite the young progressive base and improve the turnout? Especially with Republicans likely looking to youngsters like Scott Walker, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley...to name a few. Remind me which party caters to old white men again?

But yeah, I'll tell ya...it's a real long shot to imagine an R taking the White House in 2016. Almost as absurd as states like Illinois, Massachusetts or Maryland electing Republican governors! Oh, wait...

To paraphrase Robert Redford in "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid," you just keep on thinkin,' J-Doosh, that's what you're good at(as your predictions in 2012 clearly showed)...ointer:Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0:nohead:cheersgif^^

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Wtf does where he work have to do with his long established credentials as a Republican conservative? And, why don't you try addressing what he said, rather than what you think his agenda is?

If his credentials were worth a shit he’d be writing for a reputable organization instead of a left leaning rag.

No one reads his drabble except you.

 

[JDeuce]

To paraphrase Robert Redford in "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid," you just keep on thinkin,' J-Doosh, that's what you're good at(as your predictions in 2012 clearly showed)...ointer:Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0:nohead:cheersgif^^

You mean the prediction where I said this thing was really close and tough to call? Otherwise, feel free to point out where I ever said Romney was a lock. My prediction for 2016? The only job you'll be mentally qualified to do by then is mashing the food of the dimocrap candidate base to chewable levels before their primary debates take place in nursing homes across the country. Be sure to let us know how Hitlery takes her Cream of Wheat.

Funny, you talk about addressing the content of the post. Then I reply and say "Hey, your candidates probably won't appeal to a large segment of your base" and the only response you have is emoticons. You copy and paste someone else's work, then prove to be too retarded to actually address any rebuttal with your own thoughts. Just another one of the dumb asses Gruber and his minions used to achieve their end. You likely got the shit kicked out of you by...well, everyone in your life. It's not a surprise you enjoy the battered wife syndrome dimocraps need from their base.

It will actually be interesting to see the dimocraps twist themselves into knots to say we really need the experience of their old timers against the folly of youth. That ought to really sell exceptionally well with the millennials they have been trying so hard to cultivate.

 

[bilbal]

Chris Ladd?? You've got to be kidding me. consider yourself "Grubered".

 

[Dafinch]

You mean the prediction where I said this thing was really close and tough to call? Otherwise, feel free to point out where I ever said Romney was a lock. My prediction for 2016? The only job you'll be mentally qualified to do by then is mashing the food of the dimocrap candidate base to chewable levels before their primary debates take place in nursing homes across the country. Be sure to let us know how Hitlery takes her Cream of Wheat.

Funny, you talk about addressing the content of the post. Then I reply and say "Hey, your candidates probably won't appeal to a large segment of your base" and the only response you have is emoticons. You copy and paste someone else's work, then prove to be too retarded to actually address any rebuttal with your own thoughts. Just another one of the dumb asses Gruber and his minions used to achieve their end. You likely got the shit kicked out of you by...well, everyone in your life. It's not a surprise you enjoy the battered wife syndrome dimocraps need from their base.

It will actually be interesting to see the dimocraps twist themselves into knots to say we really need the experience of their old timers against the folly of youth. That ought to really sell exceptionally well with the millennials they have been trying so hard to cultivate.

Really close and tough to call? Are you denying that you said Romney would win? And, lemme fill you in on a little news flash, Slick, it WASN'T close, OR tough to call, if one knew what information to follow. As for addressing the content of the post, all you did was say that the candidates probably won't appeal to a large segment of (my) base, when early(reliable)pollls show that Hilllary would kick the ass of any Repub, and perhaps you missed the line where the article mentioned "a minimally effective Democratic candidate can expect to win 257 electoral votes without even trying."

As for copying and pasting someone else's work, that comment shows you are a complete and utter moron: I was showing how even a conservative republican can see the handwriting on the wall, so of COURSE, I'm going to copy his work, and acknowledge him as the source, you brainless fucking moron!!!!!

GOD, you're stupid...Loser!@#0:nohead:cheersgif^^:trx-smly0:kissingbb:bigfinger:fckmad::Countdown:madasshol

 

[SheriffJoe]

Chris Ladd?? You've got to be kidding me. consider yourself "Grubered".

Here's a summary of the article:

We lost because our entitlement army can never be bothered to show up for midterm elections. Once our welfare base is all ginned up for the next cult-of-personality phony, look out!

There's a tyrant in office right now defecating all over the Constitution, and these 'conservatives' are focused on 'elections' two years from now.

 

[Acebb]

Yes this 'conservative' that nobody, including the idiot who started this thread, has ever heard of, writes for the Huffington Post and tells the absolute moron who started this thread what he wants to hear, therefore the message is credible.

Again, you can not parody how silly and stupid the idiot who started this thread is. Can not do it.

 

[Dafinch]

Yes this 'conservative' that nobody, including the idiot who started this thread, has ever heard of, writes for the Huffington Post and tells the absolute moron who started this thread what he wants to hear, therefore the message is credible.

Again, you can not parody how silly and stupid the idiot who started this thread is. Can not do it.

Like many other brain dead schmucks in this thread, I notice you don't address what he said, only his credentials, and, furthermore, you're so fucking arrogant, you got the balls to try and tell ME who I have and have not heard of? Go fuck yourself...Slapping-silly90)):bigfingerazzkick(&^:madassholcockingasnook():carto1710:kissingbb:fckmad::Countdown

 

[NFLTrends]

Like many other brain dead schmucks in this thread, I notice you don't address what he said, only his credentials, and, furthermore, you're so fucking arrogant, you got the balls to try and tell ME who I have and have not heard of? Go fuck yourself...Slapping-silly90)):bigfingerazzkick(&^:madassholcockingasnook():carto1710:kissingbb:fckmad::Countdown

Anutter Winner!!!!

Way to go DaFinch!!

 

[Willie99]

this is my single most favorite narrative, by far

the fucking idiots actually thought they were going to sweep the boards, and they were swept

it just doesn't get better than that