REUTER OR BROWER??

[awesomeagain]

can someone tell me who started for the giants today??

 

[8isenough]

Brower

 

[Brock Landers]

this may be the last time i take listed pitchers..i have BIG money on the Cubs, and will not even have a play now that Rueter didn't start, he has a balky shoulder at best too, wouldn;t have lasted long..

3-0 Cubs in the 1st too!

 

[MondoMan]

I here ya Brock. I just saw the score was excited, but then I saw who was pitching in the boxscore and couldn't believe it. That blows.

 

[ChuckSims]

I rarely list pitchers, certainly would never list Rueter. Why? When Pedro pitches I will but thats about it. I have a big play on the Cubs. Cubs lead 4-0. Very Nice!

 

[wilheim]

Problem is we don't know if the Cubs would have scored 3 first inning runs against Reuter. I liked the Cubs but passed because of a few minor filters I use. Had I bet I would have insisted on Reuter being listed. Sometime I will list action vs. an opposing pitcher (Pitt's Fogg today is an example), meaning my bet is not so much on my starter but against the opposing starter.


wil.

 

[Amitightornot]

I bet the total at Intertops, I think all bets are valis at Intertops even if there is a pitching change

 

[Brock Landers]

Total's are ALWAYS listed pitchers...

 

[Jazz]

Not true, Brock - gamebookers doesn't even show the pitchers, all total bets are action

 

[Amitightornot]

Mine is a winner at Intertops!

 

[betsm@ker]

Brower, that is no action for if u bet with listed pitchers, i guess u alreday know that

 

[Frankie5angels]

A win at intertops? That book is a joke with the rules. They are a scary book to play with because they have different rules then any other book in every sport.