Republicans Destroying the Economy through Austerity... On Purpose

[akphidelt]

Just unreal. The obstructionist do-nothing Republicans have the audacity to blame Obama for the economy yet they prevent any measures that have been used in the past by almost every President to increase economic growth. Look at the average increases in spending for Reagan and Bush. Almost over 5%. Obama though is forced to be the first President in the past 50 years to spend less in the span of a year. It's insane. The economy would be working just fine and growing if the government were allowed to do what its been doing for the past century.

Obama, because of the worthless do nothing Republicans is officially the biggest fiscal conservative we have seen in the past century. And this does not include the massive reduction in public sector employment, state and local spending, etc. It's embarrassing to know that I once thought highly of Republicans. But the new party is such a joke and a disaster to the country that I probably will never be able to vote Republican again. Their constituents are just too dumb and they are willing to destroy this country to defend their failed ideology. Sort of like a religion. Just sickening stuff.

 

[GasMan]

Yup. You have it figured out.

 

[scottcarter]

LOL AK posting while drunk again. No sober person will believe that shit

 

[akphidelt]

LOL AK posting while drunk again. No sober person will believe that shit

Math and facts don't lie, only libertarians and conservatives do!

 

[akphidelt]

Yup. You have it figured out.

Had it figured out for a while. Just another notification that nothing has changed and the Republicans are still intentionally destroying this country.

 

[GasMan]

You ever notice Akphi always posts graphs that cite PERCENTAGE changes.

And then he acts like he doesn't know the significance of what that means....just like most stat junkies, just use the numbers to carve you story for you.

And then for kickers he ignores the two years from 2008-2010 where expenditures skyrocketed, thanks to the stimulus bills that were passed.


Basic math question...

What is bigger?

A) 90 percent of 10,000
B) 10 percent of 10,000,000

You really have become a complete troll douche bag. Does this kind of shit work with the dumb fucks you socialize with?

 

[GasMan]

HOLY SHIT!

Did you see the drop in spending by Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1988? What the fuck happened there, dumb fuck?

How is Reagan a Keynesian like you claim, when he actually dropped spending?*

All these numbers are enough to make your head spin...oh, wait..that's the point from your perspective.

How did Reagan improve the economy, while Obama's economy has tanked with an endless recession, high unemployment...while their pretty little graph picture looks exactly alike?

Wow, I guess Reagan just got lucky. Either that, or Obama is just plain terrible.




* - this is why you are so fucking fake with your bullshit graphs you have embarrassed yourself completely. Move to another forum.

 

[akphidelt]

You ever notice Akphi always posts graphs that cite PERCENTAGE changes.

And then he acts like he doesn't know the significance of what that means....just like most stat junkies, just use the numbers to carve you story for you.

And then for kickers he ignores the two years from 2008-2010 where expenditures skyrocketed, thanks to the stimulus bills that were passed.


Basic math question...

What is bigger?

A) 90 percent of 10,000
B) 10 percent of 10,000,000

You really have become a complete troll douche bag. Does this kind of shit work with the dumb fucks you socialize with?

Yes, the people I associate with do compare different periods of time through relativity rather than nominal terms. You are just really dumb and do not understand why.

 

[akphidelt]

HOLY SHIT!

Did you see the drop in spending by Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1988? What the fuck happened there, dumb fuck?

How is Reagan a Keynesian like you claim, when he actually dropped spending?*

All these numbers are enough to make your head spin...oh, wait..that's the point from your perspective.

How did Reagan improve the economy, while Obama's economy has tanked with an endless recession, high unemployment...while their pretty little graph picture looks exactly alike?

Wow, I guess Reagan just got lucky. Either that, or Obama is just plain terrible.




* - this is why you are so fucking fake with your bullshit graphs you have embarrassed yourself completely. Move to another forum.

There was never a drop in spending during Reagan's Presidency. You can't even understand simple graphs.

 

[GasMan]

There was never a drop in spending during Reagan's Presidency. You can't even understand simple graphs.

Exactly my point dumb fuck.

There was a MINUTE drop in PERCENTAGE spending from one year to the next under Obama, and ONLY because of the HUGE INCREASES in spending the two years prior.

You are an idiot.

Now, do every one a favor so you can expose yourself as a complete troll and post the actual dollar amounts that were spent during this graph time frame.

 

[GasMan]

I don't even think you understand what percentage change means.

 

[GasMan]

Here's a quick question.

If I increase my sales in year 1 by 40%, and then have only a 15% increase the next year over the year prior...in which year did I have more sales?

 

[akphidelt]

Exactly my point dumb fuck.

There was a MINUTE drop in PERCENTAGE spending from one year to the next under Obama, and ONLY because of the HUGE INCREASES in spending the two years prior.

You are an idiot.

Now, do every one a favor so you can expose yourself as a complete troll and post the actual dollar amounts that were spent during this graph time frame.

Lmao... this is what you said...

Did you see the drop in spending by Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1988? What the fuck happened there, dumb fuck?

How is Reagan a Keynesian like you claim, when he actually dropped spending?*

There was no drop in spending by Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1988. In fact there has never been a drop in spending by a President in the past 57 years until Obama. You are really dumb.

 

[akphidelt]

I don't even think you understand what percentage change means.

Oh I understand it fully, you apparently do not.

 

[akphidelt]

This is why conservatives should not vote... they are absolutely retarded.

 

[akphidelt]

Here's a quick question.

If I increase my sales in year 1 by 40%, and then have only a 15% increase the next year over the year prior...in which year did I have more sales?

Year 2... lol. You are really dumb.

 

[GasMan]

akphi, seriously, you cannot be this dumb.

You posted a statement that is basically blaming the Republicans for stonewalling Obama from spending the money he needs to improve the economy as your sick twisted theories promote.

Then you say Obama has been the first Prez to spend less the year prior.

You make NO mention of the huge skyrocket in spending the two years prior, which skew the numbers and data the subsequent years showing little to minutely negative percentage changes in spending in the following years. The only problem is, the numbers are so inflated now that it would be difficult to increase spending.

You are an idiot, probably the most naive person on this forum. You really don't think we see through this kind of bullshit that you post?

 

[GasMan]

Lmao... this is what you said...



There was no drop in spending by Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1988. In fact there has never been a drop in spending by a President in the past 57 years until Obama. You are really dumb.

I know dickhead, I was being sarcastic. I think you are dumber than punter.

Did you see the asterisk?

 

[akphidelt]

akphi, seriously, you cannot be this dumb.

You posted a statement that is basically blaming the Republicans for stonewalling Obama from spending the money he needs to improve the economy as your sick twisted theories promote.

Then you say Obama has been the first Prez to spend less the year prior.

You make NO mention of the huge skyrocket in spending the two years prior, which skew the numbers and data the subsequent years showing little to minutely negative percentage changes in spending in the following years. The only problem is, the numbers are so inflated now that it would be difficult to increase spending.

You are an idiot, probably the most naive person on this forum. You really don't think we see through this kind of bullshit that you post?

You didn't get my point at all... which was shown by this comment...

Did you see the drop in spending by Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1988? What the fuck happened there, dumb fuck?

How is Reagan a Keynesian like you claim, when he actually dropped spending?*

 

[akphidelt]

There is absolutely no mathematical way you can argue against my point in the OP. The math does not lie. Obama has by the lowest average increase in spending than any President in the past 50 years. That's thanks to the do nothing worthless Republicans. They'll allow their party to do it, but then prevent Obama to do it and then blame him for the results. It's unreal and sickening.