Renewal of the Wire Act (Anti Online Gambling Bill)

Search

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
17,713
Tokens
[h=1]Adelson-Backed Online Gambling Bill Splits GOP At Hearing[/h]
WASHINGTON -- After months of delays, a controversial bill to ban online gambling received a hearing from a House Judiciary subcommittee on Wednesday, pushing it closer to a vote that may divide the GOP and test Republicans' loyalties to one of the party's biggest donors.

The Restore America's Wire Act, or RAWA, would impose a federal ban on all Internet gambling, including online state lotteries and poker. Since it was introduced last year, RAWA has been championed almost singlehandedly outside Congress by casino magnate and GOP mega-donor Sheldon Adelson, whose army of lobbyists have made clear that the bill is a top priority. Adelson, chairman and CEO of Las Vegas Sands Corp., spent about $150 million in 2012 to fund Republican candidates and conservative groups.
Even with Adelson's outsized influence, Wednesday's hearing cast fresh doubts on RAWA's chance of success, as lawmakers from both parties expressed concerns that the bill may force Internet gaming offshore, where shady websites operate with virtually no regulation. Other members worried that RAWA trampled the rights of states to regulate online gaming within their borders.

"States should be allowed to decide this question for themselves, and we should not take any action that would overturn such state laws," said Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), ranking member of the Judiciary Committee. Texas Republican Ted Poe warned that a sweeping ban on Internet gaming could create a black market for online gambling, much like Prohibition created a black market for alcohol.
This isn't the first time RAWA has run afoul of states' rights advocates. In the fall of 2014, vocal opposition to the bill from thelibertarian wing of the GOP eventually forced RAWA's chief backer in the Senate, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), to abandon plans for a Senate hearing.
In the House, however, RAWA enjoys the support of top Republicans. The bill's sponsor, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), chairs the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. In January, Adelson personally met with House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and members of the Judiciary Committee to lobby for the bill's passage. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) is a longtime opponent of expanding legalized gambling.
On Wednesday, Chaffetz and Goodlatte both claimed that RAWA was, in fact, a pro-states' rights bill, because the gambling ban protected the rights of states to prevent any gambling within their borders.
"It's important for states such as Utah and Hawaii, where we have no gaming, to have the ability to protect ourselves from something that we would not like to see within our borders," said Chaffetz, citing the only two U.S. states that prohibit all forms of gambling.
As with many congressional hearings, the experts who testified at the RAWA session did little to sway the members who attended. They included three witnesses who supported RAWA -- John Kindt, professor emeritus at the University of Illinois School of Law; Les Bernal, national director of the Stop Predatory Gambling Foundation; and Michael Fagan, an adjunct professor at the Washington University School of Law. Two other witnesses -- Andrew Moylan, executive director of the free-market think tank the R Street Institute, and Parry Aftab, executive director of the Internet-safety coalition Wired Safety -- opposed RAWA.
The next steps for Chaffetz and other RAWA supporters are to schedule a markup of the bill, then vote it out of committee and send it to the full House. Unlike the last session of Congress, when RAWA backers faced pressure to insert the ban into a must-pass omnibus spending package before the end of the year, there are no time constraints this time.
Speaking to the industry publication Gambling Compliance earlier this year, Adelson's chief lobbyist Andy Abboud said the relaxed timeline would bode well for RAWA. “It should be somewhat easier with less pressure than [last session] because obviously, it’s a more wide-open timeframe,” Abboud said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/26/adelson-gambling-ban_n_6951990.html
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
19,007
Tokens
Lmao@ Adelson donating $150 million for his monopolized cause. Its money well worth it to the candidates he gave it to & they will turn around & not pass jack, at least I hope.
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
Adelson is so annoying.


Adelson=Anal


And I'm sure we can think of many more things in the slang vocabulary that he fits.

"Adelson,chairman and CEO of Las Vegas Sands Corp"

Doesn't the above tell the whole story & can't everyone else who has a say in this vote see through him & his real reasons to keep gambling off of the internet?

Greedy bastard...
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
1,998
Tokens
And I'm sure we can think of many more things in the slang vocabulary that he fits.

"Adelson,chairman and CEO of Las Vegas Sands Corp"

Doesn't the above tell the whole story & can't everyone else who has a say in this vote see through him & his real reasons to keep gambling off of the internet?


Greedy bastard...

+1 Makes me want to puke. All this guy cares about is protecting his own interests, but politicians seem all too willing to bend over if there is money coming their way.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
831
Tokens
Lmao@ Adelson donating $150 million for his monopolized cause. Its money well worth it to the candidates he gave it to & they will turn around & not pass jack, at least I hope.

Hate to get political but it is hilarious how these "conservatives" preach free-market and want the government out of all business and more de-regulation. I guess gambling does not count as business seeing Adelson and Wynn are some of the biggest contributors to conservative political causes. If it were not for the government protecting their industry they probably would not even be in business.

Go ahead, try to open a casino, to compete with these guys. It is virtually impossible because of the government restricts the barrier to entry. But open a Subway, dry-cleaners, or ice cream shop no problem.

Hilarious that they are also making it a sates right's issue of protecting the interests of their states which ban all gambling. What about the state that wants online gaming for their constituents? Their rights get trampled because. 2 states want no form of gambling? Such a ridiculous arguement.
 

schmuck
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,352
Tokens
i respond to this by 1) refusing to give any business to any adelson
owned property ( palazzo + venetian). this not only includes
gambling, but any shows, stores, or restaraunts associated with
him. to me it's amazing that the pro-free market gambling groups
haven't called for a boycott against his business interests.
2) i try to influence friends and acquaintances not to spend money
or time at an adelson property. i point out not only is he trying to
buy legislation, but he is trying to get some exclusions that would
benefit him which is exceptionally hypercritical.
 
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
6,813
Tokens
Is Bob Goodlatte still alive? He was once spearheading this crap.

Will be legal before it ever stops. I feel like more is bet daily than traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Money cures all.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,884
Messages
13,574,712
Members
100,882
Latest member
topbettor24
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com