READ AGAIN, WRONG info 3rd round dogs. you decide.it might make you think twice about them dogs.

Search
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,859
Tokens
WRONG INFO, AUBURN COVERED, BUTLER DID NOT. SORRY LOOKED AT THE WRONG SCORE. MY BAD.last year 9 dogs won su in the 1st rd.

of those 9, only 4 won ats again in the 2nd round. and only 2 won s.u.

of those 2 in the 3rd rd, both lost s.u. and ats.

sounds like the 3rd round is big trouble for a dog the third straight time.

to bad i had vandy. ouch!

2004. already mentioned vandy, a big loser.

we still have nevada, uab, and xavier.

i bet the odds are pretty good that 2 of 3 go down friday.

this isn't some system, that word gets thrown around here like a crack whore at the trailor park.

just a trend of last years dance that someone might be interested in. to bad i forgot about it until i watched vandy hand me my first lost of the night.

i know mizzzou made it in 2003 as a 8 or 10th seed, but i don't know if they were ever favored.
i'm sure some big tout has this info.

hell i might put three GOY on this and pray for the best. but it seems like all three dogs could win, but i thought that about vandy.

ah, enough about me.

YOU DECIDE.

[This message was edited by truelyhandicapping on March 26, 2004 at 02:15 PM.]
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
3,291
Tokens
Truely, the Sweet 16 more than not is infamous for this, despite the yearly upstart or two that cover or win again outright.

Not making mention of your plays, or anyone else, but the chalk does a fairly stealthy job of it here..the cream starts rising!

Sadly, the losing bettors/chalkeaters that lost versus the upstarts in 1st & 2nd Rnds, are usually the very ones backing most of these dogs when they finally bow out in these overmatched/shortened-line affairs.

GL the rest of the way, you've been rolling until yesterday..time to bounce!
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,859
Tokens
i got some wrong info

sorry fellows

auburn did cover last year, so in the 3rd round the dogs for three straaight went 1-1.

auburn covered and butler did not.

thought i had something.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,859
Tokens
DAMNIT, BURNED MY MUFFINS.

3RD LAST YEAR
PITT-6 VS (MARQ=ATS WINNER/SU)
KENT-11 VS WISKY=ATS WINNER
TEXAS -4 VS UCONN=PUSH (TEXAS WINNER SU)
MARYLAND -3- VS (MICH ST=ATSWINNER/SU)

OKLA -7- VS BUTLER (OKIE WINNER ATS/SU)
CUSE -5- VS AUBURN= ATS WINNER/LOST SU
KANSAS -3- VS DUKE=LOSER ATS
ARIZONA -? VS nd=I KNOW ND DIDN'T COVER LOST BY 17.

LAST YEARS THIRD ROUND ACTION.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,570
Tokens
Truley: this is this year concentrate on that and do what ya do best analyze and capp!! We can't live in the past!!
suomi.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,037
Tokens
Lol...

Kid, you were better off w/o any "writeups"...


Just forget it...

Post a play or two and maybe you'll get lucky.

LMAO
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,947
Messages
13,575,520
Members
100,888
Latest member
bj88gameslife
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com