who in the phuck is that?
Registrant:Wiznewski, Jim (OVMPDUHEOD) 18 Calle 19 San Jose, Costa Rica 28217 CR Domain Name: SATURNSPORTS.COM Administrative Contact: Wiznewski, Jim (35698109P) info@saturnsports.com 18 Calle 19 San Jose, Costa Rica 28217 CR 866-608-5700 Technical Contact: Network Solutions, Inc. (HOST-ORG) customerservice@networksolutions.com 21355 Ridgetop Circle Dulles, VA 20166 US 1-888-642-9675 fax: 123 123 1234 Record expires on 30-Jul-2004. Record created on 30-Jul-2003. Database last updated on 15-Sep-2003 14:55:13 EDT. Domain servers in listed order: NS.TECNI.COM 196.40.26.137 NS.TECNOCOMUNICACIONES.COM 196.40.26.141
Registrant:Wiznewski, Jim (OVMPDUHEOD) 18 Calle 19 San Jose, Costa Rica 28217 CR Domain Name: SATURNSPORTS.COM Administrative Contact: Wiznewski, Jim (35698109P) info@saturnsports.com 18 Calle 19 San Jose, Costa Rica 28217 CR 866-608-5700 Technical Contact: Network Solutions, Inc. (HOST-ORG) customerservice@networksolutions.com 21355 Ridgetop Circle Dulles, VA 20166 US 1-888-642-9675 fax: 123 123 1234 Record expires on 30-Jul-2004. Record created on 30-Jul-2003. Database last updated on 15-Sep-2003 14:55:13 EDT. Domain servers in listed order: NS.TECNI.COM 196.40.26.137 NS.TECNOCOMUNICACIONES.COM 196.40.26.141
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Greg4567:
I bet with them and I have had a good experience so far. Good limits and no problems in payouts. They also offer 1st half money lines which I have not found at a lot of books.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I suggest Bluegrass if its 1st hf and 2nd hf Momeylines your looking for......
I bet with them and I have had a good experience so far. Good limits and no problems in payouts. They also offer 1st half money lines which I have not found at a lot of books.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I suggest Bluegrass if its 1st hf and 2nd hf Momeylines your looking for......
Sr. Muny--Thanks for the info. I will look into them. Are they good?
Jay Leno--I am confused by this whole forum. It seems like whenever someone mentions a book that is not among the usual 5-10 mentioned (Olympic, Cris, etc.) people always say these other books are no good and do not pay. But, the people saying this have NEVER played with them and do not know. How do they put down books if they have no experience with them? Maybe these other books are good as well, just not as known as the other books. How do people bash books when they do not know about them?
Jay Leno--I am confused by this whole forum. It seems like whenever someone mentions a book that is not among the usual 5-10 mentioned (Olympic, Cris, etc.) people always say these other books are no good and do not pay. But, the people saying this have NEVER played with them and do not know. How do they put down books if they have no experience with them? Maybe these other books are good as well, just not as known as the other books. How do people bash books when they do not know about them?
Peteep--Thanks. I can understand why that would occur and that makes sense. But, that still does not answer my question. If you look at this forum (or at least what I have seen since I have been here) all "obscure book" (as you call them) ABSOLUTELY DO NOT PAY PERIOD. NO CHANCE they will pay, or so say the people on here. But, NONE of those people has bet with these "obscure books", so how do they know? And, at one time, wasn't Olympic or Cris or whomever an "obscure book"? Well, they are pretty solid now. So, isn't it possible these "obscure books" will be solid as well and should be given a fair chance? Or maybe I am just a "newbie" and do not understand.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Greg4567:
Peteep--Thanks. I can understand why that would occur and that makes sense. But, that still does not answer my question. If you look at this forum (or at least what I have seen since I have been here) all "obscure book" (as you call them) ABSOLUTELY DO NOT PAY PERIOD. NO CHANCE they will pay, or so say the people on here. But, NONE of those people has bet with these "obscure books", so how do they know? And, at one time, wasn't Olympic or Cris or whomever an "obscure book"? Well, they are pretty solid now. So, isn't it possible these "obscure books" will be solid as well and should be given a fair chance? Or maybe I am just a "newbie" and do not understand.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
First off, your tone in that post make it seem as though I may have offended you. That was not the intention. I was simply trying to let you know the mind-set of many people on this forum.
Many people do automatically dismiss a new book or one they haven't heard of. I don't think it's fair to automatically say "It's a shit book! They don't pay" without ever having played there. I personally wouldn't play at saturn considering all the books I KNOW do pay. Perhaps saturn pays without any problems...there's a good chance they do....however that's a gamble I don't have to take.
Peteep--Thanks. I can understand why that would occur and that makes sense. But, that still does not answer my question. If you look at this forum (or at least what I have seen since I have been here) all "obscure book" (as you call them) ABSOLUTELY DO NOT PAY PERIOD. NO CHANCE they will pay, or so say the people on here. But, NONE of those people has bet with these "obscure books", so how do they know? And, at one time, wasn't Olympic or Cris or whomever an "obscure book"? Well, they are pretty solid now. So, isn't it possible these "obscure books" will be solid as well and should be given a fair chance? Or maybe I am just a "newbie" and do not understand.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
First off, your tone in that post make it seem as though I may have offended you. That was not the intention. I was simply trying to let you know the mind-set of many people on this forum.
Many people do automatically dismiss a new book or one they haven't heard of. I don't think it's fair to automatically say "It's a shit book! They don't pay" without ever having played there. I personally wouldn't play at saturn considering all the books I KNOW do pay. Perhaps saturn pays without any problems...there's a good chance they do....however that's a gamble I don't have to take.
Jay--Ok, I can understand that and that of course is your perogative. But, why would you have to bash the book if you do not know? I am confused why you would take "not for the limit" on them paying if you do not know or have no first hand experience? Why not either (1) give them the benefit of the doubt or (2) say you do not know since you have no experience with them. But why bash them when you do not know?
