No excuse for writing such idiotic columns. 3 different posters all commented on how horrible the article was. I guess you are trying to prove your signature as being the gospel.
Let me give you a re-write example of your nonsense.
Article
Writing Tips From A Sports Forum Reader
special to the RX
A man with many years of experience in reading gambling forums offered to write on his perspective of article writers. He won't identify his home forum and points out that he has no affiliation with any forums mentioned here. The following is our guest writer’s column.
Depending upon the time of year, at least 50 percent of my time is spent reading articles on gambling. Writers seldom have any interest in gambling. Many writers subscribe to a bizarre (and mistaken) theory that writing nonsensical drivel leads to interesting articles. Just moments before deadline, wriers charge their computers. Some get their articles in, some are late and use retreads.
Insanity reigns for a minute or two. Then, they all return to their desks to proof-read and realize how bad they are. And they do suck. Some make the occasional obvious point, but the majority of writers are horrible.
Would you like some proof? Find someone to show you how little they know about the topic they are writing on. How do they justify the nonsense in their articles? Simply observe writers who wait until the last minute – then lunge at the computer and then start spewing out what they think is brilliant writing. Track their factual statements over a few days. Maintain your own independent opinion because these misguided individuals never think anything they write isn't 100% accurate and brilliant.
If you could see the lack of knowledge on the topics and all of the mistakes they make from my point of view, you might be convinced that all writers stink. I certainly appreciate their misguided feeling of self-worth, because they fill blank space and sometimes make me laugh at their trying to explain topics they know nothing about.
Get the idea