How did these work out?
January 28, 2004 |
BOSTON—Addressing guests at a $2,000-a-plate fundraiser, George W. Bush pledged Monday that, if re-elected in November, he and running mate Dick Cheney will "restore honor and dignity to the White House."
==========================
Bush was critical of Al Gore in the 2000 campaign for being part of “the administration that's been in charge” while the “price of gasoline has gone steadily upward.” In December 1999, in the first Republican primary debate, Mr. Bush said President Clinton “must jawbone OPEC members to lower prices.”
=================================
WASHINGTON -- As a candidate for the presidency in 2000, George W. Bush insisted that, if elected, he would not allow U.S. military forces to engage in "nation building."
January 28, 2004 |
BOSTON—Addressing guests at a $2,000-a-plate fundraiser, George W. Bush pledged Monday that, if re-elected in November, he and running mate Dick Cheney will "restore honor and dignity to the White House."
==========================
Bush was critical of Al Gore in the 2000 campaign for being part of “the administration that's been in charge” while the “price of gasoline has gone steadily upward.” In December 1999, in the first Republican primary debate, Mr. Bush said President Clinton “must jawbone OPEC members to lower prices.”
=================================
WASHINGTON -- As a candidate for the presidency in 2000, George W. Bush insisted that, if elected, he would not allow U.S. military forces to engage in "nation building."
Disco!
thats bullshit they promised to end the war even if they had to vote against funding.
Now why do they keep voting for funding?Is it because democrats lie and people die?
They also voted for the war.Then after voted to send them over they undermined the effort for political reasons.Now that there is a hint that it could be succesful.they continue to vote for it.
Is it because democrats lie and people die?
hmmmmmm ....
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two nonprofit journalism groups.
Some people celebrate Bush's bloody oil war...
Some don't.
[SIZE=+1] x [/SIZE]<strike>[SIZE=+2]4,100[/SIZE]</strike>[SIZE=-2]....[/SIZE][SIZE=+2]4,101[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]We now have [/SIZE][SIZE=+4]4,101[/SIZE][SIZE=+2] dead soldiers.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Do you think Bush understands[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]that these are real people and not [/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]pawns in his steal-the-oil game?[/SIZE]
hmmmmmm ....
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two nonprofit journalism groups.
Some people celebrate Bush's bloody oil war...
Some don't.
[SIZE=+2]We now have [/SIZE][SIZE=+4]4,101[/SIZE][SIZE=+2] dead soldiers.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]Do you think Bush understands[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]that these are real people and not [/SIZE]
[SIZE=+2]pawns in his steal-the-oil game?[/SIZE]
Bush "cherry picked" the Intel for his pack of 935 lies he sold to Americans ..
Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq
Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says
By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 10, 2006; Page A01
The former CIA official who coordinated U.S. intelligence on the Middle East until last year has accused the Bush administration of "cherry-picking" intelligence on Iraq to justify a decision it had already reached to go to war, and of ignoring warnings that the country could easily fall into violence and chaos after an invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein.
Paul R. Pillar, who was the national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia from 2000 to 2005, acknowledges the U.S. intelligence agencies' mistakes in concluding that Hussein's government possessed weapons of mass destruction. But he said those misjudgments did not drive the administration's decision to invade.
Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq
Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says
By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 10, 2006; Page A01
The former CIA official who coordinated U.S. intelligence on the Middle East until last year has accused the Bush administration of "cherry-picking" intelligence on Iraq to justify a decision it had already reached to go to war, and of ignoring warnings that the country could easily fall into violence and chaos after an invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein.
Paul R. Pillar, who was the national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia from 2000 to 2005, acknowledges the U.S. intelligence agencies' mistakes in concluding that Hussein's government possessed weapons of mass destruction. But he said those misjudgments did not drive the administration's decision to invade.
