Let me preface this by saying that I am not trying to sling mud or start a problem.
I am writing to find out why the Rx is the only watchdog/forum/community left which doesnt have a protection mechanism in place for its members. OGD is ensuring funds via an escrow, MW is securing funds for active forum members(as a matter of fact the level of protection has escalated from $500 to $1000 in the past month), and SGA has a program in place whereby players are protected by a pool of books in the event one member becomes insolvent.
The most disheartening part is that that there is some redundancy between Rx advertisers and those at the other sites: royal, cascade, betmill...
Should I continue?
So I ask, why is it these other sites have made a concerted effort in securing players' funds while the Rx has not? This is a genuine question and not an attempt to stir trouble.
I am writing to find out why the Rx is the only watchdog/forum/community left which doesnt have a protection mechanism in place for its members. OGD is ensuring funds via an escrow, MW is securing funds for active forum members(as a matter of fact the level of protection has escalated from $500 to $1000 in the past month), and SGA has a program in place whereby players are protected by a pool of books in the event one member becomes insolvent.
The most disheartening part is that that there is some redundancy between Rx advertisers and those at the other sites: royal, cascade, betmill...
Should I continue?
So I ask, why is it these other sites have made a concerted effort in securing players' funds while the Rx has not? This is a genuine question and not an attempt to stir trouble.