How come your article about DT leaving beteurosport only gives one side of the story?? Isn't it a journalist's(as you call yourself) job to get both sides of the story before printing an article??? I am not saying what DT says is untrue, but I would like to hear both sides before making judgement.
Gagne,
Stephen has something far more valuable he is working on at this moment than reading the forums....
His fantasy football league moves
LV711
Stephen has something far more valuable he is working on at this moment than reading the forums....
His fantasy football league moves
LV711
Nover rarely posts on this board, next time notice how low his posting count is.
I don't think there was anything wrong with what he wrote. Yeah sure there is another side to the story, but from all accounts of what he said it looks like neither side ended it with too much animosity. Don't forget as much as you would love to get both sides of a story, it just isn't that easy. The other side may not want to talk about it or they might not say much as it is. The article didn't exactly bash either side.
I don't think there was anything wrong with what he wrote. Yeah sure there is another side to the story, but from all accounts of what he said it looks like neither side ended it with too much animosity. Don't forget as much as you would love to get both sides of a story, it just isn't that easy. The other side may not want to talk about it or they might not say much as it is. The article didn't exactly bash either side.
Gagne, what was so unfair to you? I read it and don't get a big lean in any direction as to either side looking so terrible. You think the article is tilted harshly towards EuroSport or hard on DT?
BTW don't ever quote me again Nover, that's intelluctual property you are dealing with.
BTW don't ever quote me again Nover, that's intelluctual property you are dealing with.
I agree, I do not think either side was treated unfairly at all in the article. I was just wondering if eurosport had their version of what happened. A friend of mine works for that company and he claims there was no "coked up clerk" that started a fight. Yes there was an altercation, but it had nothing to do with a "coked up clerk". I think Nover added that description to make the whole story sound better.
He just told me that there was an altercation between a clerk and DT, but said that the author of the article was wrong by describing him as "coked up". I would think that you are going to have arguements or whatever with people at work and that 2 adults could work things out without violence. I know I would not quit my job over someone challenging me to a fight. It just seems that there would be more to the reason why DT left and that he did not quit just because a clerk harrassed him.
