Proof we landed on the moon! I'm a believer now.

StevieRay · Jul 23, 2019

Opinion polls taken in various locations have shown that between 6% and 20% of Americans, 25% of Britons, and 28% of Russians surveyed believe that the crewed landings were faked

sunshine11 · Jul 23, 2019

Go Angels.

unusualsusp11 · Jul 23, 2019

bilbal said:
You were most assuredly looking at a picture of one of the many mockups that NASA made of the LM and not a picture of the actual one that went to the moon. Most of the pictures on the Internet and in these silly memes are pictures of mockups and were likely edited as well. People are very easily fooled. 17% of the population are so stupid they couldn't point out their home country on a globe. Less than 1/100th of 1% understand the physics involved in producing a vehicle that can be transported by rocket, yet operate effectively in a near zero gravity environment. Again, I ask you, how does NASA manage to keep 10-20,000 people in compliance with their charade? If you tell a lie to 20,000 people, no one fesses up? Delusional.

so runmaker's landing module pictures have been altered. that's a new twist. so in 1964 when they built this rocket they were so good at it that it never failed or malfunctioned in all the missions. lift offs, landing and returning. never so much as a scratch on any astronaut ever. i recall all of these after the first one was presented to be so boring that not that many watched. no one cared. it was all old news everytime they went. overheard in the NASA executive lunch room. " most of our employees actually believe we're pulling this off for real time and time again. we've got some doubters but they won't dare say anything given the fact that we've got funding flowing in non-stop. we pay them triple what they should be getting. they're not about to burst the bubble. when the funding dries up we will just say to the populace that there's no reason to keep going there anymore. they seem tired of watching this anyway. we are all taking early retirement and we've got so much stashed away we're delirious with joy. the younger employees we have are just happy to be here working on actual advances in space exploration that maybe someday can actually happen."

bilbal · Jul 23, 2019

unusualsusp11 said:
so runmaker's landing module pictures have been altered. that's a new twist. so in 1964 when they built this rocket they were so good at it that it never failed or malfunctioned in all the missions. lift offs, landing and returning. never so much as a scratch on any astronaut ever. i recall all of these after the first one was presented to be so boring that not that many watched. no one cared. it was all old news everytime they went. overheard in the NASA executive lunch room. " most of our employees actually believe we're pulling this off for real time and time again. we've got some doubters but they won't dare say anything given the fact that we've got funding flowing in non-stop. we pay them triple what they should be getting. they're not about to burst the bubble. when the funding dries up we will just say to the populace that there's no reason to keep going there anymore. they seem tired of watching this anyway. we are all taking early retirement and we've got so much stashed away we're delirious with joy. the younger employees we have are just happy to be here working on actual advances in space exploration that maybe someday can actually happen."

overheard in the NASA executive lunch room, huh?

well, shit, Zeke, you might have just broken this whole thing wide open! Either that or you're reaching the limit of rational thought.

unusualsusp11 · Jul 23, 2019

bilbal said:
overheard in the NASA executive lunch room, huh?

well, shit, Zeke, you might have just broken this whole thing wide open! Either that or you're reaching the limit of rational thought.

even i admit that is hypothetical. the conversation could have taken place at a NASA barbecue (they had many) or at a NASA executives back porch. i'm just here to entertain. not really remotely interested if they went or not.

slapshot · Jul 23, 2019

festeringZit said:
I said this before, it bears repeating:

Rocket Scientists = really smart people but they can’t figure out how to do it again hno:
Conspiracy theory lunatics = not so smart people

60s technology was the bomb :103631605

bilbal · Jul 23, 2019

unusualsusp11 said:
even i admit that is hypothetical. the conversation could have taken place at a NASA barbecue (they had many) or at a NASA executives back porch. i'm just here to entertain. not really remotely interested if they went or not.

that conversation did not take place at a "bbq" or back porch or a front porch or a garage or a basement or on a bench down by the pond or anywhere else. a person who is 'not really remotely interested' wouldn't even read this thread, much less mouth off in it as much as you have. nice try though, slick.

RunMaker · Jul 24, 2019

Lol. I gave bilbal a shot. But I guess he is an idiot.

This is straight from Nasa's website. Zoomed in even more.

Incredible scotch tape engineering, LMFAO!!!!

The Emporer's Clothes.

How anybody can be so dumb after seeing these pictures... it literally boggles the mind. But, then again, common sense and room temperature IQ is not meant for everyone.

bilbal · Jul 24, 2019

RunMaker said:
Lol. I gave bilbal a shot. But I guess he is an idiot.

This is straight from Nasa's website. Zoomed in even more.

Incredible scotch tape engineering, LMFAO!!!!

The Emporer's Clothes.

How anybody can be so dumb after seeing these pictures... it literally boggles the mind. But, then again, common sense and room temperature IQ is not meant for everyone.

Again, it was not built to be blasted off a launch pad or withstand re-entry into earth’s atmosphere. It was built to take two astronauts and some equipment on a 3 hour zero gravity drift down to the moon, endure one minor blast to get back to the command center and then be destroyed. You can’t believe something like that could survive or protect in near zero gravity with zero weather or other forces working against it but yet you have no problem understanding how 1/8[SUP]th[/SUP] inch thick pieces of flimsy sheet metal can protect you from sustained 70 mph forces created by the constant combustion needed to battle immense gravity and constant friction. You do drive a car, don’t you? How does that freaking thing stay together? It’s just sheet metal and screws, regularly enduring incredible forces the lunar lander never came close to enduring. The car should just be crushed by the forces or fall apart, right? But there you are, safely in your seat, belted in, air conditioning going, radio playing waiting to get to your destination. Crazy.

Why can't you answer my simple question, genius. How does NASA keep all 10-20,000 people that had to be involved in staging the fake landing from spilling the beans? Successfully pulling off a *phony* moon landing would literally be 100x more difficult than pulling off the *actual* moon landing. Carry on, simpleton. I dig your stupidity.

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves/> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w

unctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w

oNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w

ontGrowAutofit/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> <w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/> <w

ontFlipMirrorIndents/> <w:OverrideTableStyleHps/> </w:Compatibility> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]-->

tatehill2000 · Jul 24, 2019

bilbal said:
Again, it was not built to be blasted off a launch pad or withstand re-entry into earth’s atmosphere. It was built to take two astronauts and some equipment on a 3 hour zero gravity drift down to the moon, endure one minor blast to get back to the command center and then be destroyed. You can’t believe something like that could survive or protect in near zero gravity with zero weather or other forces working against it but yet you have no problem understanding how 1/8[SUP]th[/SUP] inch thick pieces of flimsy sheet metal can protect you from sustained 70 mph forces created by the constant combustion needed to battle immense gravity and constant friction. You do drive a car, don’t you? How does that freaking thing stay together? It’s just sheet metal and screws, regularly enduring incredible forces the lunar lander never came close to enduring. The car should just be crushed by the forces or fall apart, right? But there you are, safely in your seat, belted in, air conditioning going, radio playing waiting to get to your destination. Crazy.

Why can't you answer my simple question, genius. How does NASA keep all 10-20,000 people that had to be involved in staging the fake landing from spilling the beans? Successfully pulling off a *phony* moon landing would literally be 100x more difficult than pulling off the *actual* moon landing. Carry on, simpleton. I dig your stupidity.

compartmentalization

lol.. you are a fool

bilbal · Jul 24, 2019

tatehill2000 said:
compartmentalization

lol.. you are a fool

tell me, genius, how many people, in your moronic opinion of course, do you think NASA needed to successfully pull off a **phony** moon landing? Complete with leaving items on the moon the Armstrong and Aldrin left behind, items that several other countries have since photographed. What number do you think that is, genius? 5 people? 12 people? 100? 10,000? 20,000? Do you have any idea how many people it would take? And when you get done answering that question, you're insisting that EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE OF THEM has been able to keep this whole thing a secret for decades? You are beyond stupid and delusional if you truly believe that.

tatehill2000 · Jul 24, 2019

bilbal said:
tell me, genius, how many people, in your moronic opinion of course, do you think NASA needed to successfully pull off a **phony** moon landing? Complete with leaving items on the moon the Armstrong and Aldrin left behind, items that several other countries have since photographed. What number do you think that is, genius? 5 people? 12 people? 100? 10,000? 20,000? Do you have any idea how many people it would take? And when you get done answering that question, you're insisting that EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE OF THEM has been able to keep this whole thing a secret for decades? You are beyond stupid and delusional if you truly believe that.

A moron will Happily explain to a retard how this is perpetrated.

1. the discussion is the first moon landing,, nothing else,, (you are conflating MANY MANY scenerios that are not included) typical retard

2. many trips could of been taken there in other formats, ie; zero gravity technology not shown to public but if anyone does ANY research can find patents describing such, (most retards are incapable of this, I assume thats why you asked me to explain).

3. compartmentalization. (I know,,, for a retard, this word is similar to MAGIC).

4. how many videos/photos exist of the earth in hidef via nasa? lol None,,,( for a retard 0 is a complex number, but 1 you can understand)

bilbal · Jul 24, 2019

I asked you a VERY specific question and, like every other dunce in here, you will not answer it and instead provided a bunch of stupid nonsense using words like "could." So I will ask you again, genius, how many people do you feel NASA needed to pull off this great charade you think has been pulled off? How many are currently IN on the great charade?

RunMaker · Jul 24, 2019

Lolz.

Look at the goddamn NASA pictures.

Duct tape, shower curtain rods, satellite dish overhanging unevenly, holes and gaps inbetween cardboard boards and plaster...

Use your own damn eyes.

Would you believe this was on the moon?

I believe your answer is yes. Open your eyes, man. Put your pride aside. That piece of junk was on the moon with the same probability of me doing a running jump over Mt. Everest and landing in Iraq for the world's greatest long jump.

Even after staring at the damn picture... if you still believe.... utterly amazing.

The saying of .... "Some people can see. Some people can be pointed in the right direction to see. And some people will never see." .... is the perfect fit for this situation.

Imagine if you were a "Lunar Lander" salesman and you went to another government and you brought this model to buyers:

"But it's made out of duct tape, tin foil and shower curtain rods," they'd say.

You wouldn't sell one of these damn fake ass models ever. But you could dupe millions of Americans.

unusualsusp11 · Jul 24, 2019

bilbal said:
tell me, genius, how many people, in your moronic opinion of course, do you think NASA needed to successfully pull off a **phony** moon landing? Complete with leaving items on the moon the Armstrong and Aldrin left behind, items that several other countries have since photographed. What number do you think that is, genius? 5 people? 12 people? 100? 10,000? 20,000? Do you have any idea how many people it would take? And when you get done answering that question, you're insisting that EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE OF THEM has been able to keep this whole thing a secret for decades? You are beyond stupid and delusional if you truly believe that.

the allegedly thousands of people and scientists were hired to prepare a rocket to go into space carrying people. the capsule with the astronauts was released into low space orbit. the rocket itself continued on as an unmanned mission. whether that one dropped the equipment there or future unmanned missions did explains the photographs. i would pick that it was 12 people who probably knew and would never admit it. they must be all dead by now. when the funding dried up NASA made the flimsy excuse and said "it costs too much and there is no reason to keep going" the population bought it since they were bored with the whole thing anyway. all these people worked on this and they somehow lost all the data and film to do it again 50 years later. no other countries have even attempted a man included mission to the moon. i find that very strange. many unmanned missions yes. even NASA recently admitted they can't get through the van allen belts without being fried to a crisp.

bilbal · Jul 24, 2019

another stupid chicken shit moron who refuses to answer my question. So I will ask it YET again. Clown, how many people do you feel NASA needed to pull off this great charade you think has been pulled off? How many are currently IN on the great charade?

Stop coughing up the same stupid shit and answer the fucking question.

bilbal · Jul 24, 2019

unusualsusp11 said:
the allegedly thousands of people and scientists were hired to prepare a rocket to go into space carrying people. the capsule with the astronauts was released into low space orbit. the rocket itself continued on as an unmanned mission. whether that one dropped the equipment there or future unmanned missions did explains the photographs. i would pick that it was 12 people who probably knew and would never admit it. they must be all dead by now. when the funding dried up NASA made the flimsy excuse and said "it costs too much and there is no reason to keep going" the population bought it since they were bored with the whole thing anyway. all these people worked on this and they somehow lost all the data and film to do it again 50 years later. no other countries have even attempted a man included mission to the moon. i find that very strange. many unmanned missions yes. even NASA recently admitted they can't get through the van allen belts without being fried to a crisp.

so yesterday you are not even remotely interested in this and today you're all up to date on the number of hoaxers who have all magically remained perfectly silent for decades???

unusualsusp11 · Jul 24, 2019

bilbal said:
so yesterday you are not even remotely interested in this and today you're all up to date on the number of hoaxers who have all magically remained perfectly silent for decades???

you gave me the numbers. it was a few not thousands. i said i was not remotely interested in whether they went or not. still interested in debunking people who actually believe that they did. it was all about losing funding for those NASA trough feeders.

bilbal · Jul 24, 2019

unusualsusp11 said:
the allegedly thousands of people and scientists were hired to prepare a rocket to go into space carrying people. the capsule with the astronauts was released into low space orbit. the rocket itself continued on as an unmanned mission. whether that one dropped the equipment there or future unmanned missions did explains the photographs. i would pick that it was 12 people who probably knew and would never admit it. they must be all dead by now. when the funding dried up NASA made the flimsy excuse and said "it costs too much and there is no reason to keep going" the population bought it since they were bored with the whole thing anyway. all these people worked on this and they somehow lost all the data and film to do it again 50 years later. no other countries have even attempted a man included mission to the moon. i find that very strange. many unmanned missions yes. even NASA recently admitted they can't get through the van allen belts without being fried to a crisp.

more 'allegedly' nonsense. seriously, did someone in the NASA executive men's room overhear that or something?

bilbal · Jul 24, 2019

unusualsusp11 said:
you gave me the numbers. it was a few not thousands. i said i was not remotely interested in whether they went or not. still interested in debunking people who actually believe that they did. it was all about losing funding for those NASA trough feeders.

a 'few' people pulled off a hoax that grand, huh? :hahahahah

in a 100,000,000 years you will never be able to debunk it. the best you clowns have is "allegedlys" and "could haves" and "it was overheard" (I love that one, dude, gotta admit, that was some funny shit right there), you clowns have nothing but hypotheticals and long debunked nonsense.

Proof we landed on the moon! I'm a believer now.

Active member

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

New member

Member

Retired; APRIL 2014 Thank You Gambling

Member

Retired; APRIL 2014 Thank You Gambling

Member

New member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Forum statistics

Share this page