Profitable Super Bowl Picks

[Bad_Cat]

The Super Bowl is the most watched sporting event and attracts the highest amount of wagering dollars of any sport. Everyone wants a piece of the action. Some people are recreational bettors and plop down money on their favorite team and/or fill out parlay prop cards for entertainment. Others are serious bettors who spend countless hours looking at statistics and dissecting the teams involved to find a edge. A few years ago I was one of those who spent countless hours researching for an edge and as exhausting as it was I did find a few Super Bowl wagering angles that have produced a profit.

One of the wagering angles that I stumbled upon has produced a tremendous profit. Below are the wagering picks for the last 11 Super Bowl's, dating back to the 2005-2006 season using this one specific approach. I don't take personal credit for results below due to the fact that the picks weren't posted in this forum, with the exception of Denver in Super Bowl 50, which I did post here at the RX. One of these days soon I will review the data from previous years not listed, pre 2006, and post the results.

As you can see you would be hard pressed to find a more significant or successful Super Bowl wagering angle that will produce more profitable results. To break down the numbers a little further the overall record is 9-0, +9.0 units against the line and 8-1, +11.85 units straight up, with the only money line loss with Arizona in 2009 as a 6 1/2 point dog. The favorites are 3-0, +3.0 units against the spread and 3-0, +3.0 units straight up. The underdogs are 6-0, +6.0 units against the spread and 5-1, +8.85 units straight up.

The lines used below are the closing lines. I will post the 2017 Super Bowl Selection immediately after the conference championship games are completed.


Super Bowl 40 February 5, 2006 Pittsburgh -4, -175 WIN 21-10 (1-0, +1.0 units ATS; 1-0, +1.0 units SU)

Super Bowl 41 February 4, 2007 Indianapolis -6 1/2, -230 WIN 29-17 (2-0, +2.0 units ATS; 2-0, +2-0 units SU)

Super Bowl 42 February 3, 2008 NY Giants +12 1/2, +350 WIN 17-14 (3-0, +3.0 units ATS; 3-0, +5.50 units SU)

Super Bowl 43 February 1, 2009 Arizona +6 1/2, +190 LOSS 23-27 (4-0, +4.0 units ATS; 3-1, +4.50 units SU)

Super Bowl 44 February 7, 2010 New Orleans +4 1/2, +170 WIN 31-17 (5-0, +5.0 units ATS; 4-1, +6.20 units SU)

Super Bowl 45 February 6, 2011 Green Bay -2 1/2, -145 WIN 31-25 (6-0, +6.0 units ATS; 5-1, +7.20 units SU)

Super Bowl 46 February 5, 2012 NY Giants +3, +120 WIN 21-17 (7-0, +7.0 units ATS; 6-1, +8.40 units SU)

Super Bowl 47 February 3, 2013 Baltimore +4 1/2, +170 WIN 34-31 (8-0, +8.0 units ATS; 7-1, +10.10 units SU)

Super Bowl 48 February 2, 2014 NO PLAY

Super Bowl 49 February 1, 2015 NO PLAY

Super Bowl 50 February 7, 2016 Denver +5, +175 WIN 24-10 (9-0, +9.0 units ATS; 8-1, +11.85 units SU)

 

[NYG4lifeNYK]

This is very interesting. Thanks for posting

 

[Bad_Cat]

Sure, no problem.

 

[XSPower]

Good luck today my friend.....

 

[RussellPeters]

Did I miss it in the post? What is the angle? What is the system that produced these results?

 

[Serbone]

Will you tell us the angle when it is Super Bowl time? Or not?
Thanks.

 

[Bad_Cat]

Will you tell us the angle when it is Super Bowl time? Or not?
Thanks.

Possibly yes. I didn't dive into that at all in my original post.

 

[Lvtexholdm]

Did I miss it in the post? What is the angle? What is the system that produced these results?

+1

 

[Bad_Cat]

It took me months to find it and compute it.

 

[Bad_Cat]

I'll say this.....give me a super bowl matchup and I'll tell you the team that will cover the line.

 

[Bad_Cat]

Based on this wagering angle one thing is for certain. New England, no matter who they play if they make the Bowl will not cover the line and 10 of the last 11 bowls show they won't win the bowl.

 

[Bad_Cat]

If Dallas makes the super bowl there is 1 scenario that Dallas wins and covers the line.

 

[Bad_Cat]

If Houston makes the super bowl they cover the line against all remaining teams in the NFC.

 

[XSPower]

Good luck today my friend.....

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

Hahahahahajahsahahahahahaha

Cant forget about this one, too!! Hilariously tries to explain he's 9-0 in Super Bowls, NONE OF WHICH WERE EVEN POSTED, then says theres an angle behind this fake 9-0 record... and doesn't even say anything about the angle Lmaooooooooo!!

I kinda feel bad for ripping on a legitimate Retard, especially when this forum is his life, but he does kinda ask for it soo.... yeah, I don't feel bad

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

Whoops, looks like I forgot to take a nice, big dump in this shit-infested thread also

 

[Bad_Cat]

Hey catsoverunders, wanna be tout, the 1kchallenge is out and was posted. You ready bitch? It's very simple. I will pick and win the super bowl. I'm helping you out. You suck at handicapping so you don't have to, no worries. Your just saying I'm wrong. Get your money ready unless you are the coward we so know you are. I love keyboard warriors. Your probably some fag hiding behind your boyfriend. One of these days someone is going to close your cockwasher for you.

 

[Bad_Cat]

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1076559

 

[Call_Me_Marquee]

In honor of Bad_Cat finally being banned again, let's re-live the absolute hilarity of this pathetic thread.

Bad_Cat, a career 40% capper who has never posted a winning season in his FIVE YEARS AT THE RX, and the biggest loser of the RX, actually had the nerve to claim he was "9-0" betting the past nine Super Bowls. Not one of them was posted at the RX. In fact, Bad_Cat hit on barely over 40% of his plays this season, then expected everyone to believe he's "9-0" betting on Super Bowls. LMAOOOOOOOO!!!


Bad_Cat's Final 2016-17 NFL Betting Record: 23-29-1 (43%)
(Or 23-33-1 , 41% , if you include his 0-4 record on parlays this year LOL)