President Obama Caps Executive Pay at Companies Receiving Bailout Money

Search

RDWHAHB
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
1,629
Tokens
by EDMUND L. ANDREWS and VIKAS BAJAJ Published: February 4, 2009
<!--NYT_INLINE_IMAGE_POSITION1 --> WASHINGTON — President Obama on Wednesday announced a salary cap of $500,000 for top executives at companies that receive large amounts of bailout money, calling the step an expression not only of fairness but of “basic common sense.” <script src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/multimedia/js/NYTInlineEmbed.js"></script> <script>DI = true; mm.LI = true; mm.AH = "Back Story With The Times’s Andrew Ross Sorkin "; mm.AS = ""; mm.AD = "264"; mm.AU = "http://graphics8.nytimes.com/podcasts/2009/02/04/04backstory-sorkin.mp3"; mm.IU = ""; writePlayer();*</script><script>WFObject("http://www.nytimes.com/packages/flash/multimedia/swfs/multiloader.swf", "p443471", "100%", "25", "8", "#FFFFFF"); so.addVariable("mp3","http://graphics8.nytimes.com/podcasts/2009/02/04/04backstory-sorkin.mp3") so.addVariable("duration","264") so.addVariable("contentPath","http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/flash/multimedia/INLINE_PLAYER/NYTInline.swf") so.addParam("allowScriptAccess", "always"); so.write("p443471");** </script> In 2007, Vikram Pandit of Citigroup, left, made $3.1 million; Kenneth D. Lewis of Bank of America, center, received over $20 million; and Rick Wagoner of General Motors made $14.4 million.
“We all need to take responsibility,” the president said as he prompted Congress once again to act on his economic stimulus program and repeated his accusations that some Wall Street executives had shown “the height of irresponsibility” when millions of non-wealthy Americans were bearing the burden of Wall Street’s failures.
The people are sick and tired, Mr. Obama said, of seeing Wall Street executives come to the government “hat in hand when they were in trouble, even as they paid themselves customary lavish bonuses.”
“This is America, and we don’t begrudge wealth,” the president said. But Americans definitely begrudge “executives being rewarded for failure,” especially if their earning are subsidized by taxpayers, he said.
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, appearing with the president, said there is a general feeling among not-so-rich Americans that they are bearing a greater burden because of the financial crisis than those who helped to create it. Mr. Geithner said he would devote “every ounce of energy” to restore public trust in financial institutions — the bedrock of the country’s credit system.
The president used the White House announcement to call for quick action on his stimulus plan, whose cost could approach $1 trillion, depending on the final version that emerges after Senate and House conclude their negotiations.
“A failure to act, and act now, will turn crisis into catastrophe and guarantee a longer recession, a less robust recovery and a more uncertain future,” the president said.
Executives of companies getting bailout money will also be prohibited from receiving any bonuses above their base pay, except for normal stock dividends.
The new rules would be far tougher than any restrictions imposed during the Bush administration, and they could force executives to accept deep reductions in pay. They come amid rising public fury about huge pay packages for executives at financial companies being propped up by federal tax dollars.
Executives at companies that have already received money from the Treasury Department would not have to make any changes. But analysts and administration officials are bracing for a huge wave of new losses, largely because of the deepening recession, and many companies that have already received federal money may well be coming back.
Under the Treasury’s $700 billion rescue program, most companies that have received money so far have been considered “healthy” rather than on the brink of collapse.
But five of the biggest companies to get help — Citigroup, Bank of America and the American International Group, General Motors and Chrysler — were all facing acute problems. And top executives at those companies made far more than $500,000 in recent years.
Kenneth D. Lewis, the chief executive of Bank of America, took home more than $20 million in 2007. Of that, $5.75 million was in salary and bonuses.
Vikram Pandit, who became chief executive of Citigroup in December of 2007 and previously held other senior positions at the bank, made $3.1 million.
Richard Wagoner, the chief executive of General Motors, made $14.4 million, much of it in stock, options and other non-cash benefits. He earned a $1.6 million salary.
“That is pretty draconian — $500,000 is not a lot of money, particularly if there is no bonus,” said James F. Reda, founder and managing director of James F. Reda & Associates, a compensation consulting firm. “And you know these companies that are in trouble are not going to pay much of an annual dividend.”
Mr. Reda said only a handful of big companies pay chief executives and other senior executives $500,000 or less in total compensation. He said such limits will make it hard for the companies to recruit and keep executives, most of whom could earn more money at other firms.
“It would be really tough to get people to staff” companies that are forced to impose these limits, he said. “I don’t think this will work.”
President Obama last week branded Wall Street bankers “shameful” for giving themselves nearly $20 billion in bonuses as the economy was deteriorating and the government was spending billions to bail out some of the nation’s most prominent financial institutions.
“If the taxpayers are helping you, then you have certain responsibilities to not be living high on the hog,” Mr. Obama said Tuesday, in an interview with “NBC Nightly News.”
Mr. Obama’s rules are coming just as he is expected to ask for additional sums of money, beyond the $700 billion already authorized, to prop up the financial system, even as he pushes Congress to move quickly on a separate economic stimulus package that could cost taxpayers as much as $900 billion.
Last week, Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri, proposed a $400,000 salary limit.
Senator McCaskill, reacting to reports of extravagant perks and bonuses at companies like Merrill Lynch and Citigroup, had blasted Wall Street executives as “a bunch of idiots” who were “kicking sand in the face of the American taxpayer.”
The banks that have received bailout funds already are subject to limits on compensation , but the Bush administration intentionally left them lax. The top five executives at banks that get an equity infusion from the government are restricted from offering golden parachutes, as rich severance packages are called, and any compensation above $500,000 is not tax deductible to the company.
Companies that received emergency money, like Citigroup, faced somewhat tougher restrictions, including a requirement to reduce the bonus pool for the top 50 executives by 40 percent. But even those restrictions come nowhere near the $500,000 cap.
In a letter to Congress last month, Lawrence H. Summers, director of Mr. Obama’s National Economic Council, suggested that the new pay restrictions would apply to all companies that get Federal help.
Without mentioning a particular dollar limit, Mr. Summers wrote that “executive compensation above a specified threshold amount be paid in restricted stock or similar form that cannot be liquidated or sold until the government has been repaid.”
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
so when does he real in the substance? the difference makers? that would be union wages and benefits.

You see, executives could work for free and the companies are still in deep shit. Nothing more than political posturing.

Gotta admit, the Messiah knows how to play his crowd.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
so when does he real in the substance? the difference makers? that would be union wages and benefits.

You see, executives could work for free and the companies are still in deep shit. Nothing more than political posturing.

Gotta admit, the Messiah knows how to play his crowd.

Union wages and benefits at banks and investment houses? :think2:
 

the bear is back biatches!! printing cancel....
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
24,692
Tokens
just more of the dog and pony show

we already set to hand them 700 billion in taxpayer money and more that likely more in the future

but hey we are gonna cap their pay for "extreme" help or whatever

and C, BAC, AIG that already got "extreme" help

they immune

i mean i'm not for government getting involved period but in the end all it is

is political posturing to the have nots as obama and the government at large continues to rape you
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
And if they don’t comply? What’s he going to do
:machinegu

Didn't spell that out did he?
:cripwalk:
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
Read where the management teams in most of the failed banks have retained their current management.

Gives one great hopes that they will get to the bottom of their problems.:pucking:
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
Union wages and benefits at banks and investment houses? :think2:

so the auto makers are not getting any bailout money now?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
6,676
Tokens
Read where the management teams in most of the failed banks have retained their current management.

Gives one great hopes that they will get to the bottom of their problems.:pucking:




LOL If Barney Frank can keep his job why can't these guys. Frank Shurmer and Dodd are a part of this failure too. I notice you never have anything bad to say about them. Oh thats right thier on your team.'

Punter when are you going to wake up and realize that the liberal way is not the American way. If you want to live like a leftwing loon you should move. You know you can do that in this country.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Punter when are you going to wake up and realize that the liberal way is not the American way. If you want to live like a leftwing loon you should move. You know you can do that in this country.

Last I read, no one in either the left wing household of PUNTER or BARMAN (Proud card carrying Loons) is unemployed.

Get back into the system somehow and then return with your sage counsel on how to best live in 21st century America
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
LOL If Barney Frank can keep his job why can't these guys. (high level execs at the companies being bailed out)

1) These execs are not being threatened with loss of job.

2) Congressman Frank and his colleagues - both Repub and Dem - have salaries that are just a fraction of the proposed annual $500,000 cutoff line.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
Hey RS! You going to turn down unemployment? It seems kinda anti conservative.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,544
Tokens
wow punter, you've resorted to citing sweetlouise threads that were completely debunked as ammo for this forum?

do we really need to get into this again or should i just c/p the link for you?
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
1) These execs are not being threatened with loss of job.

2) Congressman Frank and his colleagues - both Repub and Dem - have salaries that are just a fraction of the proposed annual $500,000 cutoff line.

so how do they accumulate so much stuff:think2:

I know I know, tax free income and urrr gifts
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,544
Tokens
(Bloomberg) -- Executives at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and hundreds of financial institutions receiving federal aid aren’t likely to be affected by pay restrictions announced yesterday by President Barack Obama.

The rules, created in response to growing public anger about the record bonuses the financial industry doled out last year, will apply only to top executives at companies that need “exceptional” assistance in the future. The limits aren’t retroactive, meaning firms that have already taken government money won’t be subject to the restrictions unless they have to come back for more.

The new guidelines are the first salvo in a broader financial-rescue plan Obama plans to announce next week. The president and Congress have had to defend billions in aid to banks that continue to provide generous bonuses and luxury perks while posting record losses. Pay caps may provide the political cover the administration needs to deliver additional infusions of capital into the financial sector that may be necessary.

Some analysts said the new rules wouldn’t have much effect.

Obama, 47, “is not proposing to go back and get that $18.4 billion in bonuses back,” Laura Thatcher, head of law firm Alston & Bird’s executive compensation practice in Atlanta, said of the cash bonuses New York banks paid last year, the sixth- biggest haul in history. “Right now, we have not clamped down” on pay at banks.

Huge Paydays

In addition, some executives may be compensated for the potential reduced salaries with restricted stock grants, which may result in huge paydays after the bank repays the government assistance with interest.

“They’re just allowing companies to defer compensation,” said Graef Crystal, a former compensation consultant and author of “The Crystal Report on Executive Compensation.”

The restrictions are “a joke,” he said, because “if the government is paid pack, you can be sure that the stock will have risen hugely.”

According to the new guidelines, announced at the White House yesterday by Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, senior executives at banks that negotiate “exceptional assistance” deals with Treasury, such as the targeted relief provided to Citigroup Inc. last November or to Bank of America Corp. in January, would be limited to annual compensation -- salary plus bonus -- of $500,000.

Office Redecoration

Other perks that enraged Americans -- such as a $1.2 million office redecoration by the chief executive of Merrill Lynch & Co., which took $10 billion in government funds, or a four-day Las Vegas junket for executives at Wells Fargo & Co., which accepted $25 billion -- will be subject to new disclosure rules.

A White House official called it the name-and-shame provision, based on the idea that banks would limit such benefits if forced to disclose them.

“For top executives to award themselves these kinds of compensation packages in the midst of this economic crisis is not only in bad taste, it’s a bad strategy, and I will not tolerate it as president,” Obama said yesterday.

Yet none of the new rules will apply to any firm until it negotiates an extraordinary deal with the federal government to remain solvent.

‘Double Dippers’

“What I’m a little bit surprised by is that those pay restrictions don’t apply to what I would call the double dippers, which is basically Citigroup and Bank of America, which have come back for capital,” said Charles Peabody, an analyst at Portales Partners LLC in New York. Both banks received money under the Treasury’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, and required additional bailout funds and a government guarantee of their assets.

The Financial Services Roundtable, a Washington-based trade group representing banks, called the restrictions “a measured response” in a news release yesterday.

For some firms, the rules are insignificant. Morgan Stanley is among companies that don’t expect the restrictions to affect their business because they foresee no need for additional government help.

“We have one of the highest Tier 1 capital ratios among financial services firms, so we do not anticipate the need for additional government capital,” said Mark Lake, a spokesman for Morgan Stanley in New York, when asked about the new restrictions.

Repaying TARP

Goldman Sachs said yesterday it wants to repay $10 billion it got from Treasury under the TARP to signal the firm is healthy and to escape limitations that came with that infusion of money. “Our financial condition is sound and, subject to approval from regulators, we hope to repay TARP money as soon as practicable,” said Lucas van Praag, a spokesman for New York- based Goldman Sachs.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said Feb. 3 that the firm didn’t need capital and didn’t ask for TARP funding. The lender accepted the $25 billion it received from the first capital injection at the request of the government and to help stabilize the banking system, he said.

Other restrictions on banks that get major new bailout packages include a “say on pay” provision that would require new executive pay packages to be subjected to nonbinding shareholder resolutions. Companies also must have in place provisions to reclaim, or “claw back,” bonuses and incentives from the top 25 senior executives if they are found to engage in deceptive practices. Bans on so-called golden parachute severance payments will be extended to more executives.

Treasury Discretion

Jen Psaki, a White House spokeswoman, said Treasury “will have discretion to apply” the restrictions “to the top leadership of the firm, but the size of that group will vary depending on the structure and size of the institution.”

Some of the new rules, including disclosure of luxury perks and the ban on golden parachutes, will also apply to banks taking part in generally available government capital programs, similar to the TARP, which has provided capital to some 360 financial institutions so far. The rules do not apply retroactively to TARP participants, however.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the rules weren’t intended to be “overly punitive,” while a senior administration officials said their primary goal is to align the interests of top executives at bailed-out firms with those of shareholders, who now include U.S. taxpayers.

Right Direction

Nell Minow, founder and president of the Corporate Library, a corporate-governance research company in Portland, Maine, said the rules are in the right direction.

“Not allowing the restricted stock awards to vest until the government’s been paid back goes a step toward the goal,” she said.

Bill Black, a professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, said the entire Wall Street pay structure is dysfunctional and needs to be revamped.

“Compensation is the root that created the perverse incentives and led to the current financial crisis,” he said.

Yet the new guidelines won’t bring about that change, said Sharyn O’Halloran, a professor of political science at Columbia University in New York.

“The goal is for accountability and the argument is that if a large portion of executive pay is based on excessive risk- taking, then you would anticipate them taking excessive risk,” she said.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
You got a source for all these claims?

Or is it just hate on your part?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,946
Messages
13,575,480
Members
100,886
Latest member
ranajeet
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com