Preakness..Rachel Out?

Search

Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
3,127
Tokens
did I hear right that she was not running?
 

Professional At All Times
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
42,732
Tokens
The specter of superstar filly Rachel Alexandra had horsemen prepared to go to desperate measures on Sunday to try to keep her from running in Saturday's 134th Preakness Stakes at Pimlico.
By the end of a whirlwind day, however, it appeared as though Rachel Alexandra, the dominant winner of the Kentucky Oaks, would still make it into the field of 14 for the Preakness. Entries for the Preakness are to be taken and post positions assigned on Wednesday.
The field is limited to 14 starters, and Pimlico and Triple Crown officials say that original nominees have preference over supplemental nominees even though that specific language is not included in the race conditions. Rachel Alexandra, purchased last week by Jess Jackson, is not Triple Crown nominated and would have to be supplemented to the Preakness for a fee of $100,000.
The day began with the owners of the first two finishers from the Kentucky Derby saying in separate interviews on HRTV that they would each enter an extra horse in an effort to keep Rachel Alexandra out. Later in the day, Hall of Fame trainer D. Wayne Lukas, already planning to run Derby last-place finisher Flying Private in the race, said he too would enter a second horse, Luv Gov, hoping to keep out Rachel Alexandra.
But late Sunday, a representative of Zayat Stable - which owns Derby runner-up Pioneerof the Nile - said Zayat would not enter a second horse. Mark Allen, a co-owner of Mine That Bird, the Derby winner, also backed off the plan by Sunday night. A representative of Marylou Whitney - owner of Luv Gov - said Luv Gov would not be entered if it meant keeping Rachel Alexandra from running.
"We love this sport," John Hendrickson, the husband of Marylou Whitney, told the New York Daily News. "If we are the deciding factor we will not enter. [Rachel Alexandra] is good for the sport. For the sake of the sport we will withdraw."
Sobhy Sonbol, racing manager for Ahmed Zayat, told Daily Racing Form Sunday night: "We are only going to run Pioneerof the Nile in the Preakness. If [Rachel Alexandra is] in there, she's in there, if she's not, she's not."
Earlier in the day, Zayat said he had received a call from Allen, who suggested that Allen and Zayat each enter a second horse. Allen, who owns Mine That Bird with Dr. Leonard Blach, told HRTV he planned on entering the 0-for-9 maiden Indy Express in the race.
When asked about the uproar that plan might create if it meant keeping out Rachel Alexandra, Allen said, "I don't think we caused the uproar. I think that this filly being bought and them supplementing her into this race caused the uproar."
Later on Sunday, Allen had reversed course.
"My decision to enter Indy Express in the Preakness was strictly business, but after consulting with my dad and Doc Blach, I have decided to withdraw Indy Express to prevent any further misunderstandings," Allen said. "Their advice to me was just to do what's right, because arrogance and greed isn't right.
"So, we'll meet everyone in Baltimore, ready to run," said Allen
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
22,534
Tokens
best I can tell there will be 13 starters in the race. including Rachel...
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Hull just dropped out and although Mine That Bird's owner was apparently trying to get other nominated horses to take her potential spot, I think that plan went out the door earlier today. She is running from everything I've heard.
 

Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
3,127
Tokens
It was on the 5pm espn but then again my kids were screaming in the back seat. Should be very exciting and honestly a bit scary with the 8 Belles tragedy and short rest.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
From Preakness.com:

RACHEL ALEXANDRA – After breezing on Sunday, Kentucky Oaks winner Rachel Alexandra had a quiet Monday morning while walking the shedrow at trainer Steve Asmussen’s barn at Churchill Downs.

The Kentucky Oaks winner tuned up for her planned debut in the Triple Crown series with a half-mile breeze in 48.40 seconds.

“She came out of her work in good order,” said Scott Blasi, a top assistant to trainer Asmussen. “Physically she looks beautiful.”

Rachel Alexandra is now poised to be officially entered in the Preakness Wednesday morning and would be the first Kentucky Oaks winner to compete in Maryland’s signature race. Sunday evening, the owners of the top two Derby finishers – Mark Allen, who co-owns the winner Mine That Bird, and Ahmed Zayat, breeder and owner of Pioneerof the Nile - said they had nixed plans to enter additional horses in the Preakness. Those decisions created an opening in the field and the announcement Monday that Hull would not be entered added yet another position in the starting gate. The filly’s new owner, Jess Jackson, said he intends to pay the supplemental fee of $100,000 to enter her in the race.

Blasi said the filly, who has won five consecutive races, is scheduled to be shipped from Louisville to Baltimore Wednesday on a charter flight.

If Rachel Alexandra is entered in the Preakness, she will be ridden by Calvin Borel, who has decided to give up the mount on Derby winner Mine That Bird. Borel is scheduled to appear on the NBC program Tonight with Jay Leno on Tuesday.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Messages
3,806
Tokens
I feel the same about this race as the 2007 Belmont Stakes. Going into that race I felt there was no way Rags To Riches could lose. Even going against Curlin Rags was ready to win that race. Going into this race I don't think other then a major accident that Rachel Alexandra could lose this race. I am hoping to get even money on her because if I can I am loading up.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
29,752
Tokens
I feel the same about this race as the 2007 Belmont Stakes. Going into that race I felt there was no way Rags To Riches could lose. Even going against Curlin Rags was ready to win that race. Going into this race I don't think other then a major accident that Rachel Alexandra could lose this race. I am hoping to get even money on her because if I can I am loading up.

I think you will get better than even money....And good luck to you, this horse may be a freak and she will have to show me...And I only wish there were a few more of the better Boys running to see how good she really is.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 5, 2007
Messages
3,415
Tokens
way to many question marks for her....

First Time vs boys
Short Rest
New Trainer

she a good horse but i just dont feel good about all the changes in her routine
 

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
5,021
Tokens
I feel the same about this race as the 2007 Belmont Stakes. Going into that race I felt there was no way Rags To Riches could lose. Even going against Curlin Rags was ready to win that race. Going into this race I don't think other then a major accident that Rachel Alexandra could lose this race. I am hoping to get even money on her because if I can I am loading up.


Save your money. RA is a terrible bet in this race. There's a big difference in race pattern with Rags to Riches heading into the Belmont and Rachel Alexander coming off a monster performance with 2 weeks rest.

Anyone betting RA is flushing their money down the toilet.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,865
Messages
13,574,261
Members
100,878
Latest member
fo88giftt
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com