Police state 101

Search

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
Police spying on truckers. Funny thing is our state has one of the highest seat belt compliance rates in the nation.

Only a matter of time before these tax collectors find other uses for their high tech spying toys.




Clackamas County takes seat belt enforcement high tech


Posted by Michael Rollins, The Oregonian September 15, 2008 18:03PM

Sgt. John Naccarato of the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office recently had what he calls "an epiphany" at 4 a.m.
Get a camera with a long lens. Hook it up to Bluetooth. Create a mobile WiFi network. Transmit photos of truckers not wearing seat belts to the camera phones of pursuit deputies. Hand out $97 tickets. Save lives.


<table style="border: 0px none ; padding: 0px;"><tbody><tr><td>Clackamas County uses high tech to nab unbelted truckers</td></tr><tr><td><script type="text/javascript" src="http://tribeca.vidavee.com/advance/trh/embedAsset.js?vtagView=on&embedded=yes&showEndCard=off&loadStream=off&autoplay=off&width=470&height=264&shareWidgets=$%7BshareWidgets%7D&vtag=yes&startVolume=50&hidecontrolbar=no&textureStrip=yes&displayTime=yes&volumeLock=off&watermark=yes&skin=v3AdvInt_oregonLive.swf&link=http://videos.oregonlive.com/oregonian/2008/09/clackamas_county_uses_high_tec.html&dockey=DD9FE46C77CB7F17CAC63FF3350F00E2"></script>
</td></tr></tbody></table>
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
"Save lives"

Christ on a crutch....does the bullshit ever get any deeper than when police agencies are looking for ways to jack citizens out of money?

I'm betting the number of OTR truck drivers who die due to not wearing a seat belt could be counted without having to take off my shoes.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
2,151
Tokens
what a waste of time and money....... motherfuckers

why don't you guys go down to city hall and catch the real criminals
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2004
Messages
2,553
Tokens
"Save lives"

Christ on a crutch....does the bullshit ever get any deeper than when police agencies are looking for ways to jack citizens out of money?

I'm betting the number of OTR truck drivers who die due to not wearing a seat belt could be counted without having to take off my shoes.


Contrast that with .. hundreds of cops hit by motorists, because cops arn't smart enough to keep their fat ass off the road while harrassing people.

:ohno: Karma:103631605
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
"I need to wear it more"
"Nice and clear. You got me."

Are we really supposed to believe the trucker said that?
I wonder what he really said?
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
Say cheese.


We could all be tracked
Cops test license-plate cameras that store, trace data

By Jim Redden

The Portland Tribune, Oct 9, 2008 (10 Reader comments)
(news photo)

Portland police are testing a high-tech camera system that rivals anything in a science fiction movie.

It can reach back in time and track your movements across the city — and even produce photos of your previous locations.

But — while some are raising Big Brother civil liberties questions about the concept — the police promise they will only use it to solve crimes, like finding stolen cars or locating wanted criminals.

The system features a series of cameras that mount on patrol cars that automatically read and photograph the license plates of all passing vehicles — including those parked along the sides of the streets. Plates of stolen and suspect-linked vehicles trigger an alarm, allowing the officers to immediately locate them.

The camera also is hooked into a computer that records the exact time and location where each plate was photographed, allowing the police to later map its previous locations around town.

“It’s not magic, but it’s pretty cool,” said Portland Police Southeast Precinct officer Terry Colbert, who has been sharing the Dodge Charger patrol car used in the test.

The test car only has been equipped with the system for a few weeks. But Colbert already has recovered seven stolen cars it identified.

Colbert believes the “data-mining” ability of the system has the potential to be even more important to the police, however.

“If a detective identifies a suspect and links him to a car, we can then go back and find out where the car has been,” Colbert said. “Or we can find out what cars were near a location where a crime was committed and where they went after that.”
System trips a trigger

Although the police still are testing the system, Jan Carson, the associate director of the Oregon chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, has some concerns about it.

She questions the legality of the police gathering and storing information about the travel patterns of people who are not suspected of committing any crimes — and wonders whether the information could be subpoenaed in civil cases.

“If the collection of the data was specifically tailored to the investigation of a crime, I don’t think we would have any problem with that,” Carson said. “But simply collecting information on where and when people are located, I think that’s a real invasion of privacy.”

Colbert said the police bureau is well aware that many Portlanders might consider the system some kind of computerized Big Brother. He counters that all of the pictures are being taken on public streets, where the expectation of privacy is far less than at home or work. And, Colbert notes, the cameras are angled down so that they only photograph the plates, not the occupants of the vehicles.
Other cities tout benefits

Although Colbert’s car is the only one in Oregon equipped with the system at this time, the technology is not new. Known as automatic license plate recognition, it is manufactured and sold by several companies. The system being tested by the police is manufactured by PIPS Technology, a division of the Federal Signal Corp., which is based in Tennessee.

Although numerous European law enforcement agencies have used the camera systems since the mid-1980s, Amercian police departments only began buying them approximately five years ago.

“Demand in this country is now doubling every year,” said company spokesman Brian Shockley.

Today, he said, about 300 domestic police departments have equipped patrol cars with the company’s system. The Long Beach (Calif.) Police Department claims that since 2005, its nine mobile camera systems have assisted in nearly 200 arrests and the recovery of more than 1,000 stolen vehicles. The Cincinnati Police Department credits the cameras with finding more than 8,000 “vehicles of interest” and assisting with about 300 arrests so far this year, including that of a homicide suspect and a suspected bank robber.

The system even can generate a profit for police by spotting vehicles with overdue parking tickets. Over the past year, Long Beach police identified and towed more than 700 vehicles with nearly $350,000 in outstanding citations.

According to Colbert, the Portland police still are fine-tuning and evaluating the camera and computer system, which can photograph and store hundreds of plate numbers during a single patrol shift.

One idea being discussed is equipping one car in each of the bureau’s five precincts with the system, potentially allowing thousands of license plates to be checked and recorded throughout the city every day.

Averaging about $25,000 per system, the equipment isn’t cheap. But even $125,000 is just a small fraction of the value of all cars stolen in Portland every year.

“There were 5,068 cars stolen in town last year at a value of $23.8 million,” Colbert said. “If we can quickly recover even a fraction of them, that will save car owners and insurance companies a lot of money.”
GPS data also linked

All such license plate camera systems work the same way. They use infrared rays to illuminate the reflectorized fronts of license plates, allowing the contrasting numbers and letters to be identified and photographed. The technology even works at night and in the rain.

Despite its sophistication, the camera is hardly noticeable on the test car. It is essentially a black cylinder, roughly six inches in diameter and four inches in length. Three cameras are mounted on the roof — two facing forward and one looking sideways on the passenger side. This setup allows them to scan the license plates of all vehicles in front of the left and right sides of the car every few seconds, along with cars in parking lots next to it.

A soft ping sounds when each picture is taken. A list of nearly 15,000 stolen plates maintained by the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles has been loaded into the computer. An alarm sounds if one of them is identified.

The cameras also are connected to a PIPS-furnished computer in the trunk of the car. It is loaded with the company’s software that records the time and Global Positioning System location of each photo.

Although Colbert believes this tracking function, potentially, is the system’s biggest benefit, it is what worries Carson the most.

“Who knows how this information will be used in the future?” Carson said. “What policies are going to be in place to protect people from being abused? Once your privacy’s been invaded, there’s little you can do about it.”
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
"I need to wear it more"
"Nice and clear. You got me."

Are we really supposed to believe the trucker said that?
I wonder what he really said?


heh....It's like every news story about a cop making a drug bust during a vehicle stop.

"The motorist consented to a search and the cops found five pounds under the back seat"


"Sure officer, take a look around. I just want to cooperate!"
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
Notice it's a primary offense. Another phony reason to pull someone over for a shake down. So it's okay to smoke around kids at home? That will be next. Lots of good comments at end of article.

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/04/oregon_house_no_smoking_when_k.html

Oregon House: No smoking when kids are in the car
by Janie Har, The Oregonian
Wednesday April 08, 2009, 7:55 PM

SALEM -- Oregon smokers have been elbowed out of bars, shooed away from entrances, and now they could get a ticket for lighting up in their own car.

The Oregon House voted Wednesday to fine anyone caught smoking with a child in a vehicle, windows rolled up or not. Minors are defined as children younger than 17 and tobacco as cigarettes, cigars or the loose stuff in pipes.

If approved, House Bill 2385 would make such smoking a primary offense, punishable by a maximum $90 fine for a first-time offender.

"I want the message to be very clear: Smoking in your car with a child is harmful to that child," said Rep. Chuck Riley, D-Hillsboro, the bill's chief sponsor.

Most Democrats supported the proposal as a way to protect children caught captive by addicts unable to stub out their smoke. Rep. Mitch Greenlick, D-Portland, said exposing young lungs to secondhand smoke "borders on child abuse."

Most Republicans opposed the bill, saying it would create busywork for already busy law enforcement. There's no question parents shouldn't smoke around their children, Rep. Vicki Berger, R-Salem, said.

But "this bill goes too far," she said, in trying to legislate what is a "social matter, not a criminal matter."

The final vote was 35-25. Republicans in favor were Reps. Vic Gilliam of Silverton and Bob Jenson of Pendleton. Democrats opposed were Reps. Tina Kotek of Portland, Chris Harker of Beaverton and Judy Stiegler of Bend.

Kotek said she agreed with the purpose of the bill but wasn't convinced this was the right way to do it.

"I was just worried about the ability to enforce it," she said.

Four states ban smoking in cars with kids inside: California, Arkansas, Louisiana and Maine.

California's law has been in effect for more than a year. Violators face a $100 fine for smoking around kids younger than 18, but they can be ticketed only after being pulled over for another motor violation.

Oregon's proposed legislation now moves to the Senate. There's no word on whether it will flame out there.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
So the govt. thugs come up with another high tech toy to harass citizens with. While that's not news, the first sentence in the article does raise some concern.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hAIREH4i6xKsPYiy1LcnKineukogD981KPL00

Pants on fire? Thermal imager may reveal a lie

By PAMELA HESS – 4 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Coming one day to a government checkpoint near you: a thermal imager that just might tip off a guard to a liar.

The research arm of the Defense Intelligence Agency has been working since 2000 on a camera that measures minute changes in facial skin temperature. Those fluctuations_ involuntary and undetectable even to the owner of the face — indicate a stress response.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
heh...Any such device would of course be triggered by cops pointing it at 99% of the population, since any such encounter (road block) triggers a stress response mode for even the most clear minded citizen
 

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
How about sending the cops to our ghettos to bust the real animals? Lock those fuckers up and throw away the key.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
Arizona Drunk Drivers Face Arrest at Fast Food Joints

Sunday, June 14, 2009

* Print
* ShareThis

TUCSON, Ariz. — Drunken Arizona drivers with the late-night munchies may soon be getting more than chicken strips at drive-through windows.

The Pima County Sheriff's Department has a new campaign targeting drunken driving. Operation Would U Like Fries, or Operation WULF, will put undercover deputies inside 24-hour fast-food restaurants to spot impaired drivers placing their orders.

Sgt. Doug Hanna, a DUI unit supervisor, says if deputies notice someone with classic symptoms of impairment — slurred speech, red or watery eyes or beer breath — they will have a uniformed deputy stationed outside pull the driver over.

Hanna says money for the intermittent program is coming from a $128,000 grant from the Governor's Office of Highway Safety.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
Oregon bans driving with cell phone, unless you are over 18. Then you are only banned from holding the phone.

Of course, it's a primary offense. Gee, I wonder how many 18, 19, 20, and 21 year olds will be pulled over because they are on a cell phone? But like the safety nazis say, "it's better to be safe than sorry."

And studies have already shown it's not the holding of the phone, it's the distraction of the conversation that causes some people problems.
So, given that we will see more crashes with folks using hands-free, it is certain all people will be banned from using any type of cell phone, period.
"And I am proud to an American because at least I know I am free."
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
Cell phone bill repasses in House, heads to governor
by Melissa Repko, The Oregonian
Wednesday June 24, 2009, 11:25 AM

SALEM--The Oregon House repassed the bill that would ban driving while using a hand-held cell phone on Wednesday. It now heads to the governor's desk.

A vote of 39-20 approved the amended version of House Bill 2377 to allow emergency and public safety personnel to use hand-held cell phones while driving.

A spokeswoman of Gov. Ted Kulongoski said the governor will sign the bill. The law will take effect Jan. 1 and will fine drivers up to $90.

Under the new law, it will be a primary offense for minors to use a cell phone while driving whether it is hand-held or hands-free. Drivers over 18 will be able to use hands-free cell phone devices.

-- Melissa Repko; melissarepko@news.oregonian.com
 

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
6,145
Tokens
National campaign to attack 'distracted driving'
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 3:46 PM
By Bill Bush
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced a new national campaign this afternoon to stop people from using cell phones while driving.

The group, called FocusDriven, is the first national nonprofit organization devoted specifically to raising awareness about the dangers of "distracted driving," which LaHood said could mean anything from texting to eating a hamburger while driving.

He hopes it will have the same impact as Mothers Against Drunk Driving had on toughening drinking and driving laws.

"The American public clearly wants to see some action on this," LaHood said. "This is now a hot-button issue for state legislators," and "I hope it will become a hot-button issue for Congress this year."

The group will be led by Jennifer Smith, a Grapevine, Texas, woman whose mother was killed by someone talking on his cell phone while driving in 2008. The campaign is supported by the National Safety Council.

Supporters of the new campaign were asked whether hands-free headsets would be OK. They made clear that any "talking" that distracts drivers should be banned and criminalized.

"I'm going to set the bar from my point of view at the highest possible level," LaHood said, implying that Congress and the states would be more likely to create tougher laws if the bar were high.

"We're on a rampage about this," LaHood said.

FocusDriven's new Web site, www.focusdriven.org, has information on how people can join the group, contribute money or start local chapters.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,877
Messages
13,574,558
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com