Please spare us from Stephen Nover front page articles.

[JackDee]

I ll be chiming in a $ 1000 so that this hack wont post again, give me a break, put nover on my paylist so he dont post again. After the peep fiasco, where he claimed peep had been "One of the worst posters", this no good mediocrity writes these pearls of wisdom:

"There has been tremendous mistrust in this area. Many bettors have the attitude that if a book posts a line they must honor it. Some of these gamblers also believe bookmakers use a bad number/mistake rule to hide from incompetence.

Conversely, scammers and bettors acting in collusion and sharpies out to cherry pick have burned some bookmakers.
"

Some of the most retarded words i ve heard in terms of gamlbing, unintelligent, boring, boring, boring.

Does the shrink actually pay this hack per week...


Come out of the closet nover and defend yourself for your blatant lies and downright stupidity.

Come out of the closet and post for a change before littering and dividing this forum with ratings.

Come out of the closet and define such dumbass quotes as: "Therefore, arriving at exact definitions on bad lines would be groundbreaking."

Come out of the closet and say it loud and proud, i cant gamble, i just write sub par articles with fewer than 200 words and get paid for that.

Drop me an email and i ll pay your sorry ass upwards $2000 a month for not posting anymore of your lame prose on the front page.

 

[clevfan]

look, stephen is a good writer, and if you don't like him skip it! I actually come here to read his articles and basically skip over the rest

 

[JackDee]

alright clen, you are actually a poster i both like and respect some let me ask you a few questions:

a. does a fair, good, and impartial writer declare with outmost authority that the ex super mod of the rx, a guy with 10,000 posts, like peep is one of the worst posters?

b. does a good writer only manage 200 words per article.

c. does a good writer rate poster on a forum he has never bothered to post at, let alone read as it seems.

d. does a good writer write such both sub par verbally as well as sub gambling wyse sentences as: : "Therefore, arriving at exact definitions on bad lines would be groundbreaking."

e. does a good writer has NOT ONE SINGLE POSTER POSTING ANYTHING WORTHWHILE NOVER HAS POSTED ON REQUEST.

and...
f. Skip to what, he is the sole writer showcased on the rx. front page.


Listen stephen, that is my last offer, and i mean it, $2500 per month for the next 6 months to not write anything nor post at the rx, email me at babadragon@excite.com, it's a hefty price but i am willing to pay it just to make a point that hacks can't and wont be tolerated in the gambling world, it's a good offer steven, and if you let me gamble it for you (that means wager on it, bet it, etc.) i may triple it, so go ahead email me and accept it, but like said, no more from you, not even a comma.

 

[Skyweasel]

Does a good writer wait until he's sober to rant and rave about some other writer? In this case, apparently not!

 

[LouDiamond+]

"it's a hefty price but i am willing to pay it just to make a point that hacks can't and wont be tolerated in the gambling world,"

Bullsh!t!

That's the only way to get in.

 

[JackDee]

weasel, your ad hominems come to show you can answer none of points a-f, it comes to show your how poor you are in terms of reasoning to resort to such old and worn out tacticts as ad hominems, oh, and guess fvcking what, my ancestors where already documenting rhetoric firures of speech back when you "Madison, WI, USA" ancestors, oh wait, that where the maya and inka and indians which you slaughtered, alright let me rephrase, back when your i presume south european ancestors where hunting pigs with sticks.

so spare me your lame ass attempt at irony, fvck that's a greek word too, and gimme some answers, oh wait you aint got any.

 

[JackDee]

Lou, i respect your bitterness, but i can't accept it as the modus vivendi (check your latin dictionary for that one) of the gambling world.

I had it with nover, and his sub par articles, i might seem like a herretic here but manic depressive butch, or so called, was a far, far, far better writer than this hack.

And once again i ask, for the fourth time in a few days: What's one valueable thing nover posted that you remember?

 

[Dante]

CLEV!!!!! oh my god a post from clev.. clev you need to post more often

 

[JackDee]

i can't believe clev just came out of the shadows to oppose my post?!?!?!?!!!

i still like clev, and have always condired her as a class act for sure.

 

[ballsofblue]

while we are bitching about grammar and vocabulary.

"that where the maya and inka and indians which you slaughtered"

its Inca you blowhole
just kidding i'm bored

 

[JackDee]

alright balls, i accept the humour, wish nover had some, nah...


btw, was it the kkk or the ccc, or the cia for that matter?

 

[ballsofblue]

good to see some people around here have a since of humor and can take a joke.

don't catch the kkk,ccc, cia part.

 

[JackDee]

nah, i was just using the "C" in inca or inka to make a pun with the kkk, whether they should be called ccc or something, maybe a failed attempt really...

 

[PO69]

It is not like anyone reads the frontpage anyway, so it doesnt matter!!! If only some of the advertisers knew that as well

 

[JackDee]

good point, hopefully they don't.

 

[beentheredonethat]

Jackdee,

Clearly you can not read very well or at least understand what you read.

NOVER DID NOT SAY THAT PEEP WAS ONE OF THE WORST POSTERS. HE SAID THAT PEOPLE THAT HE POLLED SAID HE WAS ONE OF THE WORST. I happened to be the person that gave Peeps name to Stephen. I made a mistake. But to hang Stephen and claim he said something that HE DID NOT SAY is at best irresponsible. But, what is new -- you hide behind an alias.