Pistons should not be favored next game!

[jasin4000]

Maybe im just a little pissed I had the PISStons, but realistically what is the line going to be for game in 3 in detroit. After spurs beat the pistons without a sweat in game 2, and in game one, after the first quarter...I like the spurs to win the series in 5

 

[LarryTalbot]

olympic -4

pinnacle -4.5

 

[michael777]

gimme the spurs +4

 

[Highdaddy]

pistons by double digits

 

[Piranha]

After yesterday's lopsided win for SA the line for game 3 should be Det -2/3. I feel if the line is 4 and higher the linesmaker wants the money to go on SA for game 3 and therefore a Detriot win and cover. They do not want this series to be 3-0 otherwise the ratings would definitely plummet and interest would fade. So game 3 should be a Detriot win and cover after that I think SA in 5.

 

[valueman]

Admittedly I know nothing about basketball but I happened to catch most of the last 2 games.

Spurs look better in all areas and a fresher team. 4-0 sweep for me.

 

[CAPNCRUNCH]

After yesterday's lopsided win for SA the line for game 3 should be Det -2/3. I feel if the line is 4 and higher the linesmaker wants the money to go on SA for game 3 and therefore a Detriot win and cover. They do not want this series to be 3-0 otherwise the ratings would definitely plummet and interest would fade. So game 3 should be a Detriot win and cover after that I think SA in 5.

Does ABC/ESPN make the lines for the NBA now?:smoker2:

 

[RobFunk]

Admittedly I know nothing about basketball but I happened to catch most of the last 2 games.

Spurs look better in all areas and a fresher team. 4-0 sweep for me.

I said the exact same thing before the seattle game 3. Remember what happened?

 

[Aquatic]

Piranha

Conspiracy theories abound again. Last year the Networks also didn't want Detroit winning in 5 instead of 7 as well as those easy Laker series during their dynasty.

I was watching ESPN Classic the other day as they showed the Laker/Celtic series in '87 when the Lakers beat Boston by double figures both games in L.A. only to go to Boston and lose by 6 in Game #3 and if Magic doesn't hit the baby hook at the end of Game #4 then it's 2-2. So the first 2 games don't always dictate the series as good as the Spurs looked on the court they went 38-3 on during the regular season.

 

[BoratSagdiyev]

How about that year when the Celtics blew them out in Game one only to lose the series.I think they won by some 20 points or so. Ginobli will prove to be tto much once again. The Pistons can't take enough steroids to overcome the Spurs overall talent. Although Ginobli is on the sauce too.

Conspiracy theories abound again. Last year the Networks also didn't want Detroit winning in 5 instead of 7 as well as those easy Laker series during their dynasty.

I was watching ESPN Classic the other day as they showed the Laker/Celtic series in '87 when the Lakers beat Boston by double figures both games in L.A. only to go to Boston and lose by 6 in Game #3 and if Magic doesn't hit the baby hook at the end of Game #4 then it's 2-2. So the first 2 games don't always dictate the series as good as the Spurs looked on the court they went 38-3 on during the regular season.

 

[wilheim]

Absolute must win situation for the Pistons, I have to believe they will give their best effort to stave off a 3-0 hole in the series. I am laying 4.5 -105 on the Pistons - FWIW.


wil.

 

[Aquatic]

What a difference a site makes

Line wasn't high enough it appears.


arty: HOME SWEET HOME

 

[TheGeneral+]

Go PISTONS.

 

[gamblingman+]

Pistons win game 4 also

 

[Piranha]

After my "Conspiracy Theory" came through, the public will be jumping on Detriot for Game 4 and we will see now the true SA team come to play and win Game 4.